Paolo Fusar-Poli1,2, Marco Cappucciati3,4, Andrea De Micheli3,4, Grazia Rutigliano3,5, Ilaria Bonoldi3,2, Stefania Tognin3,2, Valentina Ramella-Cravaro3,6, Augusto Castagnini7, Philip McGuire3. 1. Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK; paolo.fusar-poli@kcl.ac.uk. 2. OASIS Service, South London and the Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK. 3. Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK. 4. Department of Brain and Behavioural Sciences, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy. 5. Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy. 6. Department of Neurofarba, University of Florence, Florence, Italy. 7. Postgraduate School of Child Neuropsychiatry, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Brief Limited Intermittent Psychotic Symptoms (BLIPS) are key inclusion criteria to define individuals at ultra high risk for psychosis (UHR). Their diagnostic and prognostic significance is unclear. OBJECTIVES: To address the baseline diagnostic relationship between BLIPS and the ICD-10 categories and examine the longitudinal prognostic impact of clinical and sociodemographic factors. METHODS: Prospective long-term study in UHR individuals meeting BLIPS criteria. Sociodemographic and clinical data, including ICD-10 diagnoses, were automatically drawn from electronic health records and analyzed using Kaplan-Meier failure function (1-survival), Cox regression models, bootstrapping methods, and Receiver Operating Characteristics (ROC) curve. RESULTS: Eighty BLIPS were included. At baseline, two-thirds (68%) of BLIPS met the diagnostic criteria for ICD-10 Acute and Transient Psychotic Disorder (ATPD), most featuring schizophrenic symptoms. The remaining individuals met ICD-10 diagnostic criteria for unspecified nonorganic psychosis (15%), mental and behavioral disorders due to use of cannabinoids (11%), and mania with psychotic symptoms (6%). The overall 5-year risk of psychosis was 0.54. Recurrent episodes of BLIPS were relatively rare (11%) but associated with a higher risk of psychosis (hazard ratio [HR] 3.98) than mono-episodic BLIPS at the univariate analysis. Multivariate analysis revealed that seriously disorganizing or dangerous features increased greatly (HR = 4.39) the risk of psychosis (0.89 at 5-year). Bootstrapping confirmed the robustness of this predictor (area under the ROC = 0.74). CONCLUSIONS: BLIPS are most likely to fulfill the ATPD criteria, mainly acute schizophrenic subtypes. About half of BLIPS cases develops a psychotic disorder during follow-up. Recurrent BLIPS are relatively rare but tend to develop into psychosis. BLIPS with seriously disorganizing or dangerous features have an extreme high risk of psychosis.
BACKGROUND: Brief Limited Intermittent Psychotic Symptoms (BLIPS) are key inclusion criteria to define individuals at ultra high risk for psychosis (UHR). Their diagnostic and prognostic significance is unclear. OBJECTIVES: To address the baseline diagnostic relationship between BLIPS and the ICD-10 categories and examine the longitudinal prognostic impact of clinical and sociodemographic factors. METHODS: Prospective long-term study in UHR individuals meeting BLIPS criteria. Sociodemographic and clinical data, including ICD-10 diagnoses, were automatically drawn from electronic health records and analyzed using Kaplan-Meier failure function (1-survival), Cox regression models, bootstrapping methods, and Receiver Operating Characteristics (ROC) curve. RESULTS: Eighty BLIPS were included. At baseline, two-thirds (68%) of BLIPS met the diagnostic criteria for ICD-10 Acute and Transient Psychotic Disorder (ATPD), most featuring schizophrenic symptoms. The remaining individuals met ICD-10 diagnostic criteria for unspecified nonorganic psychosis (15%), mental and behavioral disorders due to use of cannabinoids (11%), and mania with psychotic symptoms (6%). The overall 5-year risk of psychosis was 0.54. Recurrent episodes of BLIPS were relatively rare (11%) but associated with a higher risk of psychosis (hazard ratio [HR] 3.98) than mono-episodic BLIPS at the univariate analysis. Multivariate analysis revealed that seriously disorganizing or dangerous features increased greatly (HR = 4.39) the risk of psychosis (0.89 at 5-year). Bootstrapping confirmed the robustness of this predictor (area under the ROC = 0.74). CONCLUSIONS: BLIPS are most likely to fulfill the ATPD criteria, mainly acute schizophrenic subtypes. About half of BLIPS cases develops a psychotic disorder during follow-up. Recurrent BLIPS are relatively rare but tend to develop into psychosis. BLIPS with seriously disorganizing or dangerous features have an extreme high risk of psychosis.
Authors: Tandy J Miller; Thomas H McGlashan; Joanna L Rosen; Kristen Cadenhead; Tyrone Cannon; Joseph Ventura; William McFarlane; Diana O Perkins; Godfrey D Pearlson; Scott W Woods Journal: Schizophr Bull Date: 2003 Impact factor: 9.306
Authors: Alison R Yung; Hok Pan Yuen; Patrick D McGorry; Lisa J Phillips; Daniel Kelly; Margaret Dell'Olio; Shona M Francey; Elizabeth M Cosgrave; Eoin Killackey; Carrie Stanford; Katherine Godfrey; Joe Buckby Journal: Aust N Z J Psychiatry Date: 2005 Nov-Dec Impact factor: 5.744
Authors: S M Francey; B Nelson; A Thompson; A G Parker; M Kerr; C Macneil; R Fraser; F Hughes; K Crisp; S Harrigan; S J Wood; M Berk; P D McGorry Journal: Schizophr Res Date: 2010-03-26 Impact factor: 4.939
Authors: Paolo Fusar-Poli; Andreas Bechdolf; Matthew John Taylor; Ilaria Bonoldi; William T Carpenter; Alison Ruth Yung; Philip McGuire Journal: Schizophr Bull Date: 2012-05-15 Impact factor: 9.306
Authors: Robert Stewart; Mishael Soremekun; Gayan Perera; Matthew Broadbent; Felicity Callard; Mike Denis; Matthew Hotopf; Graham Thornicroft; Simon Lovestone Journal: BMC Psychiatry Date: 2009-08-12 Impact factor: 3.630
Authors: Benjamin Buck; Kevin A Hallgren; Emily Scherer; Rachel Brian; Rui Wang; Weichen Wang; Andrew Campbell; Tanzeem Choudhury; Marta Hauser; John M Kane; Dror Ben-Zeev Journal: J Psychiatr Res Date: 2019-06-10 Impact factor: 4.791
Authors: Cathy Davies; Andrea Cipriani; John P A Ioannidis; Joaquim Radua; Daniel Stahl; Umberto Provenzani; Philip McGuire; Paolo Fusar-Poli Journal: World Psychiatry Date: 2018-06 Impact factor: 49.548
Authors: Scott W Woods; Albert R Powers; Jerome H Taylor; Charlie A Davidson; Jason K Johannesen; Jean Addington; Diana O Perkins; Carrie E Bearden; Kristin S Cadenhead; Tyrone D Cannon; Barbara A Cornblatt; Larry J Seidman; Ming T Tsuang; Elaine F Walker; Thomas H McGlashan Journal: Schizophr Bull Date: 2018-02-15 Impact factor: 9.306
Authors: Albert R Powers; Jean Addington; Diana O Perkins; Carrie E Bearden; Kristin S Cadenhead; Tyrone D Cannon; Barbara A Cornblatt; Daniel H Mathalon; Larry J Seidman; Ming T Tsuang; Elaine F Walker; Thomas H McGlashan; Scott W Woods Journal: Schizophr Res Date: 2019-12-02 Impact factor: 4.939
Authors: Joaquim Radua; Valentina Ramella-Cravaro; John P A Ioannidis; Abraham Reichenberg; Nacharin Phiphopthatsanee; Taha Amir; Hyi Yenn Thoo; Dominic Oliver; Cathy Davies; Craig Morgan; Philip McGuire; Robin M Murray; Paolo Fusar-Poli Journal: World Psychiatry Date: 2018-02 Impact factor: 49.548
Authors: Paolo Fusar-Poli; Andrea De Micheli; Rashmi Patel; Lorenzo Signorini; Syed Miah; Thomas Spencer; Philip McGuire Journal: Schizophr Bull Date: 2020-04-18 Impact factor: 9.306