Paolo Fusar-Poli1,2,3, Grazia Rutigliano1,4, Daniel Stahl3,5, Cathy Davies1, Ilaria Bonoldi1,2, Thomas Reilly1, Philip McGuire6. 1. Early Psychosis: Interventions and Clinical Detection Lab, Department of Psychosis Studies, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, England. 2. Outreach and Support in South London Service, South London and the Maudsley National Health Service Foundation Trust, London, England. 3. National Institute for Health Research Biomedical Research Centre for Mental Health, IoPPN, King's College London, London, England. 4. Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy. 5. Department of Biostatistics, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, England. 6. Department of Psychosis Studies, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, England.
Abstract
Importance: The overall effect of At Risk Mental State (ARMS) services for the detection of individuals who will develop psychosis in secondary mental health care is undetermined. Objective: To measure the proportion of individuals with a first episode of psychosis detected by ARMS services in secondary mental health services, and to develop and externally validate a practical web-based individualized risk calculator tool for the transdiagnostic prediction of psychosis in secondary mental health care. Design, Setting, and Participants: Clinical register-based cohort study. Patients were drawn from electronic, real-world, real-time clinical records relating to 2008 to 2015 routine secondary mental health care in the South London and the Maudsley National Health Service Foundation Trust. The study included all patients receiving a first index diagnosis of nonorganic and nonpsychotic mental disorder within the South London and the Maudsley National Health Service Foundation Trust in the period between January 1, 2008, and December 31, 2015. Data analysis began on September 1, 2016. Main Outcomes and Measures: Risk of development of nonorganic International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems, Tenth Revision psychotic disorders. Results: A total of 91 199 patients receiving a first index diagnosis of nonorganic and nonpsychotic mental disorder within South London and the Maudsley National Health Service Foundation Trust were included in the derivation (n = 33 820) or external validation (n = 54 716) data sets. The mean age was 32.97 years, 50.88% were men, and 61.05% were white race/ethnicity. The mean follow-up was 1588 days. The overall 6-year risk of psychosis in secondary mental health care was 3.02 (95% CI, 2.88-3.15), which is higher than the 6-year risk in the local general population (0.62). Compared with the ARMS designation, all of the International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems, Tenth Revision diagnoses showed a lower risk of psychosis, with the exception of bipolar mood disorders (similar risk) and brief psychotic episodes (higher risk). The ARMS designation accounted only for a small proportion of transitions to psychosis (n = 52 of 1001; 5.19% in the derivation data set), indicating the need for transdiagnostic prediction of psychosis in secondary mental health care. A prognostic risk stratification model based on preselected variables, including index diagnosis, age, sex, age by sex, and race/ethnicity, was developed and externally validated, showing good performance and potential clinical usefulness. Conclusions and Relevance: This online individualized risk calculator can be of clinical usefulness for the transdiagnostic prediction of psychosis in secondary mental health care. The risk calculator can help to identify those patients at risk of developing psychosis who require an ARMS assessment and specialized care. The use of this calculator may eventually facilitate the implementation of an individualized provision of preventive focused interventions and improve outcomes of first episode psychosis.
Importance: The overall effect of At Risk Mental State (ARMS) services for the detection of individuals who will develop psychosis in secondary mental health care is undetermined. Objective: To measure the proportion of individuals with a first episode of psychosis detected by ARMS services in secondary mental health services, and to develop and externally validate a practical web-based individualized risk calculator tool for the transdiagnostic prediction of psychosis in secondary mental health care. Design, Setting, and Participants: Clinical register-based cohort study. Patients were drawn from electronic, real-world, real-time clinical records relating to 2008 to 2015 routine secondary mental health care in the South London and the Maudsley National Health Service Foundation Trust. The study included all patients receiving a first index diagnosis of nonorganic and nonpsychotic mental disorder within the South London and the Maudsley National Health Service Foundation Trust in the period between January 1, 2008, and December 31, 2015. Data analysis began on September 1, 2016. Main Outcomes and Measures: Risk of development of nonorganic International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems, Tenth Revision psychotic disorders. Results: A total of 91 199 patients receiving a first index diagnosis of nonorganic and nonpsychotic mental disorder within South London and the Maudsley National Health Service Foundation Trust were included in the derivation (n = 33 820) or external validation (n = 54 716) data sets. The mean age was 32.97 years, 50.88% were men, and 61.05% were white race/ethnicity. The mean follow-up was 1588 days. The overall 6-year risk of psychosis in secondary mental health care was 3.02 (95% CI, 2.88-3.15), which is higher than the 6-year risk in the local general population (0.62). Compared with the ARMS designation, all of the International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems, Tenth Revision diagnoses showed a lower risk of psychosis, with the exception of bipolar mood disorders (similar risk) and brief psychotic episodes (higher risk). The ARMS designation accounted only for a small proportion of transitions to psychosis (n = 52 of 1001; 5.19% in the derivation data set), indicating the need for transdiagnostic prediction of psychosis in secondary mental health care. A prognostic risk stratification model based on preselected variables, including index diagnosis, age, sex, age by sex, and race/ethnicity, was developed and externally validated, showing good performance and potential clinical usefulness. Conclusions and Relevance: This online individualized risk calculator can be of clinical usefulness for the transdiagnostic prediction of psychosis in secondary mental health care. The risk calculator can help to identify those patients at risk of developing psychosis who require an ARMS assessment and specialized care. The use of this calculator may eventually facilitate the implementation of an individualized provision of preventive focused interventions and improve outcomes of first episode psychosis.
Authors: Ewout W Steyerberg; Andrew J Vickers; Nancy R Cook; Thomas Gerds; Mithat Gonen; Nancy Obuchowski; Michael J Pencina; Michael W Kattan Journal: Epidemiology Date: 2010-01 Impact factor: 4.822
Authors: Paolo Fusar-Poli; Andreas Bechdolf; Matthew John Taylor; Ilaria Bonoldi; William T Carpenter; Alison Ruth Yung; Philip McGuire Journal: Schizophr Bull Date: 2012-05-15 Impact factor: 9.306
Authors: Robert Stewart; Mishael Soremekun; Gayan Perera; Matthew Broadbent; Felicity Callard; Mike Denis; Matthew Hotopf; Graham Thornicroft; Simon Lovestone Journal: BMC Psychiatry Date: 2009-08-12 Impact factor: 3.630
Authors: Adam J Ciarleglio; Gary Brucato; Michael D Masucci; Rebecca Altschuler; Tiziano Colibazzi; Cheryl M Corcoran; Francesca M Crump; Guillermo Horga; Eugénie Lehembre-Shiah; Wei Leong; Scott A Schobel; Melanie M Wall; Lawrence H Yang; Jeffrey A Lieberman; Ragy R Girgis Journal: Psychol Med Date: 2018-06-28 Impact factor: 7.723
Authors: Lotta-Katrin Pries; Sinan Guloksuz; Margreet Ten Have; Ron de Graaf; Saskia van Dorsselaer; Nicole Gunther; Christian Rauschenberg; Ulrich Reininghaus; Rajiv Radhakrishnan; Maarten Bak; Bart P F Rutten; Jim van Os Journal: Schizophr Bull Date: 2018-06-06 Impact factor: 9.306
Authors: Nikolaos Koutsouleris; Lana Kambeitz-Ilankovic; Stephan Ruhrmann; Marlene Rosen; Anne Ruef; Dominic B Dwyer; Marco Paolini; Katharine Chisholm; Joseph Kambeitz; Theresa Haidl; André Schmidt; John Gillam; Frauke Schultze-Lutter; Peter Falkai; Maximilian Reiser; Anita Riecher-Rössler; Rachel Upthegrove; Jarmo Hietala; Raimo K R Salokangas; Christos Pantelis; Eva Meisenzahl; Stephen J Wood; Dirk Beque; Paolo Brambilla; Stefan Borgwardt Journal: JAMA Psychiatry Date: 2018-11-01 Impact factor: 21.596
Authors: Paolo Fusar-Poli; Marco Solmi; Natascia Brondino; Cathy Davies; Chungil Chae; Pierluigi Politi; Stefan Borgwardt; Stephen M Lawrie; Josef Parnas; Philip McGuire Journal: World Psychiatry Date: 2019-06 Impact factor: 49.548
Authors: Boris Birmaher; John A Merranko; Tina R Goldstein; Mary Kay Gill; Benjamin I Goldstein; Heather Hower; Shirley Yen; Danella Hafeman; Michael Strober; Rasim S Diler; David Axelson; Neal D Ryan; Martin B Keller Journal: J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry Date: 2018-08-07 Impact factor: 8.829