Literature DB >> 20378314

The psychosis threshold in Ultra High Risk (prodromal) research: is it valid?

Alison R Yung, Barnaby Nelson, Andrew Thompson, Stephen J Wood.   

Abstract

"Transition to psychosis" has been the outcome of interest in Ultra High Risk (UHR) and "prodromal" studies. However, the point at which an individual crosses the line from high risk or prodromal state to psychosis threshold is arbitrary. There have been few attempts to examine whether this threshold has any validity in terms of biological markers or course and outcome. More research is needed to determine if the current point at which a person is declared "psychotic" is valid. Indeed some persons labeled as having developed psychosis may quickly recover. In such a situation their transition could be seen as "trivial". Others who do not make "transition" may have worse outcomes. Validation of the transition point is an important issue as "risk syndrome for psychosis" (psychosis prodrome) is being considered for inclusion in the DSMV. Further, much research attempts to distinguish markers for psychotic disorders by examining the differences between UHR individuals who do and do not develop psychosis. Thus it behooves us not just to have this risk syndrome validated, but to have the hypothetical endpoint of psychosis validated as well. (c) 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20378314     DOI: 10.1016/j.schres.2010.03.014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Schizophr Res        ISSN: 0920-9964            Impact factor:   4.939


  41 in total

1.  Beyond the "at risk mental state" concept: transitioning to transdiagnostic psychiatry.

Authors:  Patrick D McGorry; Jessica A Hartmann; Rachael Spooner; Barnaby Nelson
Journal:  World Psychiatry       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 49.548

2.  Individualized differential diagnosis of schizophrenia and mood disorders using neuroanatomical biomarkers.

Authors:  Nikolaos Koutsouleris; Eva M Meisenzahl; Stefan Borgwardt; Anita Riecher-Rössler; Thomas Frodl; Joseph Kambeitz; Yanis Köhler; Peter Falkai; Hans-Jürgen Möller; Maximilian Reiser; Christos Davatzikos
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2015-05-01       Impact factor: 13.501

3.  Recovery from an at-risk state: clinical and functional outcomes of putatively prodromal youth who do not develop psychosis.

Authors:  Danielle A Schlosser; Sarah Jacobson; Qiaolin Chen; Catherine A Sugar; Tara A Niendam; Gang Li; Carrie E Bearden; Tyrone D Cannon
Journal:  Schizophr Bull       Date:  2011-08-08       Impact factor: 9.306

4.  Diagnostic markers for schizophrenia: do we actually know what we're looking for?

Authors:  Stephen J Wood; Alison R Yung
Journal:  World Psychiatry       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 49.548

5.  Individual prediction of long-term outcome in adolescents at ultra-high risk for psychosis: Applying machine learning techniques to brain imaging data.

Authors:  Sanne de Wit; Tim B Ziermans; M Nieuwenhuis; Patricia F Schothorst; Herman van Engeland; René S Kahn; Sarah Durston; Hugo G Schnack
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2016-10-04       Impact factor: 5.038

6.  Prediction and prevention of psychosis: current progress and future tasks.

Authors:  Stephan Ruhrmann; Frauke Schultze-Lutter; Stefanie J Schmidt; Nathalie Kaiser; Joachim Klosterkötter
Journal:  Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci       Date:  2014-09-26       Impact factor: 5.270

7.  Interpersonal sensitivity and persistent attenuated psychotic symptoms in adolescence.

Authors:  Alice Masillo; M Brandizzi; L R Valmaggia; R Saba; N Lo Cascio; J F Lindau; L Telesforo; P Venturini; D Montanaro; D Di Pietro; M D'Alema; P Girardi; P Fiori Nastro
Journal:  Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry       Date:  2017-09-16       Impact factor: 4.785

8.  Symptom dimensions and functional impairment in early psychosis: more to the story than just negative symptoms.

Authors:  Daniel Fulford; Tara A Niendam; Erin G Floyd; Cameron S Carter; Daniel H Mathalon; Sophia Vinogradov; Barbara K Stuart; Rachel L Loewy
Journal:  Schizophr Res       Date:  2013-04-12       Impact factor: 4.939

9.  'At-risk' for psychosis research: where are we heading?

Authors:  A Lin; B Nelson; A R Yung
Journal:  Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci       Date:  2012-07-30       Impact factor: 6.892

10.  Neuroanatomical Predictors of Functional Outcome in Individuals at Ultra-High Risk for Psychosis.

Authors:  Renate L E P Reniers; Ashleigh Lin; Alison R Yung; Nikolaos Koutsouleris; Barnaby Nelson; Vanessa L Cropley; Dennis Velakoulis; Patrick D McGorry; Christos Pantelis; Stephen J Wood
Journal:  Schizophr Bull       Date:  2017-03-01       Impact factor: 9.306

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.