Literature DB >> 28053058

Mouthpart conduit sizes of fluid-feeding insects determine the ability to feed from pores.

Matthew S Lehnert1, Andrew Bennett2, Kristen E Reiter2, Patrick D Gerard3, Qi-Huo Wei4, Miranda Byler2, Huan Yan4, Wah-Keat Lee5.   

Abstract

Fluid-feeding insects, such as butterflies, moths and flies (20% of all animal species), are faced with the common selection pressure of having to remove and feed on trace amounts of fluids from porous surfaces. Insects able to acquire fluids that are confined to pores during drought conditions would have an adaptive advantage and increased fitness over other individuals. Here, we performed feeding trials using solutions with magnetic nanoparticles to show that butterflies and flies have mouthparts adapted to pull liquids from porous surfaces using capillary action as the governing principle. In addition, the ability to feed on the liquids collected from pores depends on a relationship between the diameter of the mouthpart conduits and substrate pore size diameter; insects with mouthpart conduit diameters larger than the pores cannot successfully feed, thus there is a limiting substrate pore size from which each species can acquire liquids for fluid uptake. Given that natural selection independently favoured mouthpart architectures that support these methods of fluid uptake (Diptera and Lepidoptera share a common ancestor 280 Ma that had chewing mouthparts), we suggest that the convergence of this mechanism advocates this as an optimal strategy for pulling trace amounts of fluids from porous surfaces.
© 2017 The Author(s).

Keywords:  Diptera; Lepidoptera; capillarity; liquid bridges; nanoparticles

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28053058      PMCID: PMC5247492          DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2016.2026

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.349


  22 in total

1.  Energetics and pollination ecology.

Authors:  B Heinrich; P H Raven
Journal:  Science       Date:  1972-05-12       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Hydrophobic-hydrophilic dichotomy of the butterfly proboscis.

Authors:  Matthew S Lehnert; Daria Monaenkova; Taras Andrukh; Charles E Beard; Peter H Adler; Konstantin G Kornev
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2013-06-12       Impact factor: 4.118

3.  Blood-feeding and nectar-feeding in adult tabanidae (Diptera).

Authors:  Fritz-Werner Kniepert
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1980-07       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  Mud-puddling behavior in tropical butterflies: in search of proteins or minerals?

Authors:  Jan Beck; Eva Mühlenberg; Konrad Fiedler
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  Experimental analysis of the liquid-feeding mechanism of the butterfly Pieris rapae.

Authors:  Seung Chul Lee; Bo Heum Kim; Sang Joon Lee
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2014-03-13       Impact factor: 3.312

6.  On the mechanics and energetics of nectar feeding in butterflies.

Authors:  J G Kingsolver; T L Daniel
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  1979-01-21       Impact factor: 2.691

7.  Erection pattern and section-wise wettability of honeybee glossal hairs in nectar feeding.

Authors:  Jianing Wu; Rengao Zhu; Shaoze Yan; Yunqiang Yang
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2015-01-08       Impact factor: 3.312

8.  Sodium: stimulus for puddling behavior by tiger swallowtail butterflies, Papilio glaucus.

Authors:  K Arms; P Feeny; R C Lederhouse
Journal:  Science       Date:  1974-07-26       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  One proboscis, two tasks: adaptations to blood-feeding and nectar-extracting in long-proboscid horse flies (Tabanidae, Philoliche).

Authors:  Florian Karolyi; Jonathan F Colville; Stephan Handschuh; Brian D Metscher; Harald W Krenn
Journal:  Arthropod Struct Dev       Date:  2014-07-24       Impact factor: 2.010

10.  Uptake of liquid from wet surfaces by the brush-tipped proboscis of a butterfly.

Authors:  Seung Chul Lee; Sang Joon Lee
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2014-11-06       Impact factor: 4.379

View more
  6 in total

1.  Mouthpart conduit sizes of fluid-feeding insects determine the ability to feed from pores.

Authors:  Matthew S Lehnert; Andrew Bennett; Kristen E Reiter; Patrick D Gerard; Qi-Huo Wei; Miranda Byler; Huan Yan; Wah-Keat Lee
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2017-01-11       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  The Ingestion of Fluorescent, Magnetic Nanoparticles for Determining Fluid-uptake Abilities in Insects.

Authors:  Matthew S Lehnert; Kristen E Reiter; Andrew Bennett; Patrick D Gerard; Qi-Huo Wei; Miranda Byler; Huan Yan; Wah-Keat Lee
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2017-12-20       Impact factor: 1.355

3.  Sucking or lapping: facultative feeding mechanisms in honeybees (Apis mellifera).

Authors:  Jiangkun Wei; Zixin Huo; Stanislav N Gorb; Alejandro Rico-Guevara; Zhigang Wu; Jianing Wu
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2020-08-12       Impact factor: 3.703

4.  Sperm transfer through hyper-elongated beetle penises - morphology and theoretical approaches.

Authors:  Yoko Matsumura; Jan Michels; Hamed Rajabi; Tateo Shimozawa; Stanislav N Gorb
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-07-15       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  An augmented wood-penetrating structure: Cicada ovipositors enhanced with metals and other inorganic elements.

Authors:  Matthew S Lehnert; Kristen E Reiter; Gregory A Smith; Gene Kritsky
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-12-24       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Material Properties and Morphology of Prestomal Teeth in Relation to the Feeding Habits of Diptera (Brachycera).

Authors:  Matthew S Lehnert; Lauren A Tarver; Jiansheng Feng
Journal:  Insects       Date:  2022-02-17       Impact factor: 2.769

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.