Literature DB >> 28050575

Lay Attitudes Toward Trust, Uncertainty, and the Return of Pediatric Research Results in Biobanking.

John Lynch1, Janelle Hines2, Sarah Theodore2, Monica Mitchell2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Trust plays a role in participants' reactions to clinical residual biobanks. The purpose of this study is to assess whether trust in medical researchers and negative reactions of uncertainty influences the attitudes of parents of pediatric research participants toward the return of genomic research results from biobanking.
METHODS: Focus groups were conducted in collaboration with two community-based organizations. Participants completed a demographic questionnaire and the trust in research and intolerance of uncertainty scales. The focus groups were then conducted according to a thematic focus group guide; discussions were transcribed and analyzed by two trained coders.
RESULTS: Emerging themes included the importance of returning research results to both children and parents, sharing results with few limitations based on a child's age, and the desire for results even when researchers had concerns about analytic validity. Negative reactions to uncertainty appear to have influenced only one theme: the paradoxical claim by participants with stronger reactions to uncertainty that they had a "right to information."
CONCLUSION: Participants prefer to receive most or all of the results produced by genomic research, and they want their children, within variable age restrictions, to have access to that information as well.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Return of results; biobanking; trust; uncertainty

Year:  2015        PMID: 28050575      PMCID: PMC5201190          DOI: 10.1080/23294515.2015.1053008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJOB Empir Bioeth        ISSN: 2329-4515


  35 in total

1.  Perspectives of clinical genetics professionals toward genome sequencing and incidental findings: a survey study.

Authors:  A A Lemke; D Bick; D Dimmock; P Simpson; R Veith
Journal:  Clin Genet       Date:  2012-12-07       Impact factor: 4.438

2.  Reporting genetic results in research studies: summary and recommendations of an NHLBI working group.

Authors:  Ebony B Bookman; Aleisha A Langehorne; John H Eckfeldt; Kathleen C Glass; Gail P Jarvik; Michael Klag; Greg Koski; Arno Motulsky; Benjamin Wilfond; Teri A Manolio; Richard R Fabsitz; Russell V Luepker
Journal:  Am J Med Genet A       Date:  2006-05-15       Impact factor: 2.802

3.  Empowering primary care health professionals in medical genetics: how soon? How fast? How far?

Authors:  K Greendale; R E Pyeritz
Journal:  Am J Med Genet       Date:  2001

4.  Pediatric biobanks: approaching informed consent for continuing research after children grow up.

Authors:  Aaron J Goldenberg; Sara Chandros Hull; Jeffrey R Botkin; Benjamin S Wilfond
Journal:  J Pediatr       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 4.406

Review 5.  Managing incidental findings in human subjects research: analysis and recommendations.

Authors:  Susan M Wolf; Frances P Lawrenz; Charles A Nelson; Jeffrey P Kahn; Mildred K Cho; Ellen Wright Clayton; Joel G Fletcher; Michael K Georgieff; Dale Hammerschmidt; Kathy Hudson; Judy Illes; Vivek Kapur; Moira A Keane; Barbara A Koenig; Bonnie S Leroy; Elizabeth G McFarland; Jordan Paradise; Lisa S Parker; Sharon F Terry; Brian Van Ness; Benjamin S Wilfond
Journal:  J Law Med Ethics       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 1.718

6.  Do researchers have an obligation to actively look for genetic incidental findings?

Authors:  Catherine Gliwa; Benjamin E Berkman
Journal:  Am J Bioeth       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 11.229

7.  Duty to disclose what? Querying the putative obligation to return research results to participants.

Authors:  F A Miller; R Christensen; M Giacomini; J S Robert
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 2.903

8.  Survey of US public attitudes toward pharmacogenetic testing.

Authors:  S B Haga; J M O'Daniel; G M Tindall; I R Lipkus; R Agans
Journal:  Pharmacogenomics J       Date:  2011-02-15       Impact factor: 3.550

9.  Deficiency of knowledge of genetics and genetic tests among general practitioners, gynecologists, and pediatricians: a global problem.

Authors:  Marieke J H Baars; Lidewij Henneman; Leo P Ten Kate
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2005 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 8.822

10.  Characterizing biobank organizations in the U.S.: results from a national survey.

Authors:  Gail E Henderson; R Jean Cadigan; Teresa P Edwards; Ian Conlon; Anders G Nelson; James P Evans; Arlene M Davis; Catherine Zimmer; Bryan J Weiner
Journal:  Genome Med       Date:  2013-01-25       Impact factor: 11.117

View more
  3 in total

1.  Factors influencing parental trust in medical researchers for child and adolescent patients' clinical trial participation.

Authors:  Jennifer Cunningham-Erves; Jason Deakings; Tilicia Mayo-Gamble; Kendria Kelly-Taylor; Stephania T Miller
Journal:  Psychol Health Med       Date:  2019-01-10       Impact factor: 2.423

Review 2.  Opportunities, resources, and techniques for implementing genomics in clinical care.

Authors:  Teri A Manolio; Robb Rowley; Marc S Williams; Dan Roden; Geoffrey S Ginsburg; Carol Bult; Rex L Chisholm; Patricia A Deverka; Howard L McLeod; George A Mensah; Mary V Relling; Laura Lyman Rodriguez; Cecelia Tamburro; Eric D Green
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2019-08-05       Impact factor: 79.321

3.  Parental attitudes and expectations towards receiving genomic test results in healthy children.

Authors:  Alanna Kulchak Rahm; Lindsay Bailey; Kara Fultz; Audrey Fan; Janet L Williams; Adam Buchanan; F Daniel Davis; Michael F Murray; Marc S Williams
Journal:  Transl Behav Med       Date:  2018-01-29       Impact factor: 3.046

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.