H Naik1, X Qiu2, M C Brown1, L Eng1, D Pringle1, M Mahler1, H Hon1, K Tiessen1, H Thai1, V Ho1, C Gonos1, R Charow1, V Pat1, M Irwin1, L Herzog1, A Ho1, W Xu2, J M Jones3, D Howell1, G Liu4. 1. Ontario Cancer Institute, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto. 2. Biostatistics, Ontario Cancer Institute, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto. 3. Toronto General Research Institute, Toronto and. 4. Ontario Cancer Institute, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto;; Medicine and Epidemiology, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Smoking cessation and increased physical activity (pa) have been linked to better outcomes in cancer survivors. We assessed whether socioeconomic factors influence changes in those behaviours after a cancer diagnosis. METHODS: As part of a cross-sectional study, a diverse group of cancer survivors at the Princess Margaret Cancer Centre (Toronto, ON), completed a questionnaire about past and current lifestyle behaviours and perceptions about the importance of those behaviours with respect to their health. The influence of socioeconomic indicators on smoking status and physical inactivity at 1 year before and after diagnosis were assessed using multivariable logistic regression with adjustment for clinico-demographic factors. RESULTS: Of 1222 participants, 1192 completed the smoking component. Of those respondents, 15% smoked before diagnosis, and 43% of those smokers continued to smoke after. The proportion of survivors who continued to smoke increased with lower education level (p = 0.03). Of the 1106 participants answering pa questions, 39% reported being physically inactive before diagnosis, of whom 82% remained inactive afterward. Survivors with a lower education level were most likely to remain inactive after diagnosis (p = 0.003). Lower education level, household income, and occupation were associated with the perception that pa had no effect or could worsen fatigue and quality of life (p ≤ 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: In cancer survivors, education level was a major modifier of smoking and pa behaviours. Lower socioeconomic status was associated with incorrect perceptions about pa. Targeting at-risk survivors by education level should be evaluated as a strategy in cancer survivorship programs.
PURPOSE: Smoking cessation and increased physical activity (pa) have been linked to better outcomes in cancer survivors. We assessed whether socioeconomic factors influence changes in those behaviours after a cancer diagnosis. METHODS: As part of a cross-sectional study, a diverse group of cancer survivors at the Princess Margaret Cancer Centre (Toronto, ON), completed a questionnaire about past and current lifestyle behaviours and perceptions about the importance of those behaviours with respect to their health. The influence of socioeconomic indicators on smoking status and physical inactivity at 1 year before and after diagnosis were assessed using multivariable logistic regression with adjustment for clinico-demographic factors. RESULTS: Of 1222 participants, 1192 completed the smoking component. Of those respondents, 15% smoked before diagnosis, and 43% of those smokers continued to smoke after. The proportion of survivors who continued to smoke increased with lower education level (p = 0.03). Of the 1106 participants answering pa questions, 39% reported being physically inactive before diagnosis, of whom 82% remained inactive afterward. Survivors with a lower education level were most likely to remain inactive after diagnosis (p = 0.003). Lower education level, household income, and occupation were associated with the perception that pa had no effect or could worsen fatigue and quality of life (p ≤ 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: In cancer survivors, education level was a major modifier of smoking and pa behaviours. Lower socioeconomic status was associated with incorrect perceptions about pa. Targeting at-risk survivors by education level should be evaluated as a strategy in cancer survivorship programs.
Authors: Sophia K Smith; James E Herndon; H Kim Lyerly; April Coan; Jane L Wheeler; Tina Staley; Amy P Abernethy Journal: Psychooncology Date: 2011-05 Impact factor: 3.894
Authors: Daniel J Corsi; S V Subramanian; Scott A Lear; Clara K Chow; Koon K Teo; Michael H Boyle Journal: Health Place Date: 2013-03-13 Impact factor: 4.078
Authors: Akemi T Wijayabahu; Zhi Zhou; Robert L Cook; Babette Brumback; Nicole Ennis; Lusine Yaghjyan Journal: Cancer Causes Control Date: 2019-02-09 Impact factor: 2.506
Authors: Yuan-Yuan Lei; Suzanne C Ho; Thomas K H Lau; Carol Kwok; Ashley Cheng; Ka Li Cheung; Roselle Lee; Winnie Yeo Journal: Qual Life Res Date: 2021-01-14 Impact factor: 4.147
Authors: Lawson Eng; Dan Pringle; Jie Su; XiaoWei Shen; Mary Mahler; Chongya Niu; Rebecca Charow; Kyoko Tiessen; Christine Lam; Oleksandr Halytskyy; Hiten Naik; Henrique Hon; Margaret Irwin; Vivien Pat; Christina Gonos; Catherine Chan; Jodie Villeneuve; Luke Harland; Ravi M Shani; M Catherine Brown; Peter Selby; Doris Howell; Wei Xu; Geoffrey Liu; Shabbir M H Alibhai; Jennifer M Jones Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2018-05-29 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Denalee M O'Malley; Cindy K Blair; Alissa Greenbaum; Charles L Wiggins; Ashwani Rajput; Vi K Chiu; Anita Y Kinney Journal: J Community Genet Date: 2022-01-08
Authors: Wenjie Zhang; Hongdao Meng; Shujuan Yang; Honglin Luo; Danping Liu Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2018-08-09 Impact factor: 3.390