OBJECTIVE:Physical activity (PA) has been shown to provide health benefits for breast cancer patients. The effects of augmenting oncology health care provider (HCP) advice for PA with 3 months of telephone counseling versus contact control were evaluated in a randomized trial. METHODS: After receiving brief HCP advice to become physically active, 192 women (age in years: M = 60.0, SD = 9.9) who had completed treatment for Stage 0-IV breast cancer were randomized to telephone counseling to support PA (n = 106) or contact control (n = 86). Their PA, motivational readiness, fatigue, and physical functioning were assessed at baseline (before receiving HCP advice), 3, 6, and 12 months. RESULTS:Telephone counseling produced significant effects on the primary outcome of moderate-intensity PA of about 30 min/week at both 3 months (95% CI = 0.44, 57.32) and 6 months (95% CI = 3.06, 61.26). Intervention participants were also more than twice as likely as control participants to report improvements in achieving PA guidelines of at least 150 min/week at 3 (OR = 2.43, 95% CI = 1.18, 4.98) and 6 months (OR = 2.11, 95% CI = 1.00-4.48). Telephone counseling was significantly more effective than contact control in increasing motivational readiness for PA at all follow-ups (ORs = 3.93-6.28, all ps <.003). No between-groups differences were found for fatigue, while differential improvements in physical functioning did not remain significant past 3 months (p = .01). CONCLUSION:HCP advice plus telephone counseling improved PA among breast cancer patients at 3 and 6 months and also differentially improved patients' motivational readiness at all follow-ups, suggesting the potential for exercise promotion in cancer follow-up care. PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2013 APA, all rights reserved.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE: Physical activity (PA) has been shown to provide health benefits for breast cancerpatients. The effects of augmenting oncology health care provider (HCP) advice for PA with 3 months of telephone counseling versus contact control were evaluated in a randomized trial. METHODS: After receiving brief HCP advice to become physically active, 192 women (age in years: M = 60.0, SD = 9.9) who had completed treatment for Stage 0-IV breast cancer were randomized to telephone counseling to support PA (n = 106) or contact control (n = 86). Their PA, motivational readiness, fatigue, and physical functioning were assessed at baseline (before receiving HCP advice), 3, 6, and 12 months. RESULTS: Telephone counseling produced significant effects on the primary outcome of moderate-intensity PA of about 30 min/week at both 3 months (95% CI = 0.44, 57.32) and 6 months (95% CI = 3.06, 61.26). Intervention participants were also more than twice as likely as control participants to report improvements in achieving PA guidelines of at least 150 min/week at 3 (OR = 2.43, 95% CI = 1.18, 4.98) and 6 months (OR = 2.11, 95% CI = 1.00-4.48). Telephone counseling was significantly more effective than contact control in increasing motivational readiness for PA at all follow-ups (ORs = 3.93-6.28, all ps <.003). No between-groups differences were found for fatigue, while differential improvements in physical functioning did not remain significant past 3 months (p = .01). CONCLUSION: HCP advice plus telephone counseling improved PA among breast cancerpatients at 3 and 6 months and also differentially improved patients' motivational readiness at all follow-ups, suggesting the potential for exercise promotion in cancer follow-up care. PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2013 APA, all rights reserved.
Authors: Karen Basen-Engquist; Catherine M Alfano; Melissa Maitin-Shepard; Cynthia A Thomson; Kathryn H Schmitz; Bernardine M Pinto; Kevin Stein; David S Zucker; Karen L Syrjala; Elizabeth Fallon; Colleen Doyle; Wendy Demark-Wahnefried Journal: Obesity (Silver Spring) Date: 2017-11 Impact factor: 5.002
Authors: Bernardine M Pinto; Wendy Demark-Wahnefried; Julia H Rowland; Noreen M Aziz Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2014-11 Impact factor: 4.254
Authors: Ana D Goode; Sheleigh P Lawler; Charlotte L Brakenridge; Marina M Reeves; Elizabeth G Eakin Journal: J Cancer Surviv Date: 2015-03-11 Impact factor: 4.442
Authors: H Naik; X Qiu; M C Brown; L Eng; D Pringle; M Mahler; H Hon; K Tiessen; H Thai; V Ho; C Gonos; R Charow; V Pat; M Irwin; L Herzog; A Ho; W Xu; J M Jones; D Howell; G Liu Journal: Curr Oncol Date: 2016-12-21 Impact factor: 3.677
Authors: Maria C Swartz; Zakkoyya H Lewis; Elizabeth J Lyons; Kristofer Jennings; Addie Middleton; Rachel R Deer; Demi Arnold; Kaitlin Dresser; Kenneth J Ottenbacher; James S Goodwin Journal: Arch Phys Med Rehabil Date: 2017-04-17 Impact factor: 3.966
Authors: Amy M Berkman; Amy Trentham-Dietz; Kim Dittus; Vicki Hart; Christine M Vatovec; John G King; Ted A James; Susan G Lakoski; Brian L Sprague Journal: Prev Med Date: 2015-04-06 Impact factor: 4.018
Authors: Laura Q Rogers; Kerry S Courneya; Philip M Anton; Steven Verhulst; Sandra K Vicari; Randall S Robbs; Edward McAuley Journal: Psychooncology Date: 2016-09-06 Impact factor: 3.894
Authors: Shirley M Bluethmann; Sally W Vernon; Kelley Pettee Gabriel; Caitlin C Murphy; L Kay Bartholomew Journal: Breast Cancer Res Treat Date: 2015-01-03 Impact factor: 4.872