OBJECTIVE: In a pilot study, participation in the Pathfinders program was associated with reductions in distress and despair and improvements in quality of life (QOL) among advanced breast cancer patients. This study explores the relationship between psychosocial resources invoked through the Pathfinders intervention and outcomes. METHODS: Advanced breast cancer patients were enrolled in a prospective, single-arm, pilot study of the Pathfinders psychosocial program. Participants met at least monthly with a licensed clinical social worker who administered the Pathfinders intervention, which focused on strengthening adaptive coping skills, identifying inner strengths, and developing a self-care plan. Longitudinal assessments over 6 months used validated instruments to assess changes in Pathfinders targets (coping, social support, self-efficacy, spirituality, and optimism) and outcomes (distress, despair, QOL, and fatigue). Multiple linear regression models examined the joint effect of average changes in target subscales on average outcome changes, adjusted for baseline outcome scores and patient characteristics. RESULTS: Participants (n=44) were: mean age 51 (SD, 12), 20% non-Caucasian, 50% college degree, and 75% married. Improvements in active coping skills, self-efficacy, and spiritual meaning/peace significantly correlated with an improvement in despair after adjustment for demographic characteristics (all P<0.05). Improvements in social support significantly correlated with positive changes in distress (P<0.05). Gains in learned optimism independently correlated with an increase in overall QOL (P<0.01). CONCLUSIONS: In this pilot assessment, changes in pre-defined Pathfinders targets such as coping skills, social support, self-efficacy, spirituality, and optimism correlated with improvements in patient-reported outcomes.
OBJECTIVE: In a pilot study, participation in the Pathfinders program was associated with reductions in distress and despair and improvements in quality of life (QOL) among advanced breast cancerpatients. This study explores the relationship between psychosocial resources invoked through the Pathfinders intervention and outcomes. METHODS: Advanced breast cancerpatients were enrolled in a prospective, single-arm, pilot study of the Pathfinders psychosocial program. Participants met at least monthly with a licensed clinical social worker who administered the Pathfinders intervention, which focused on strengthening adaptive coping skills, identifying inner strengths, and developing a self-care plan. Longitudinal assessments over 6 months used validated instruments to assess changes in Pathfinders targets (coping, social support, self-efficacy, spirituality, and optimism) and outcomes (distress, despair, QOL, and fatigue). Multiple linear regression models examined the joint effect of average changes in target subscales on average outcome changes, adjusted for baseline outcome scores and patient characteristics. RESULTS:Participants (n=44) were: mean age 51 (SD, 12), 20% non-Caucasian, 50% college degree, and 75% married. Improvements in active coping skills, self-efficacy, and spiritual meaning/peace significantly correlated with an improvement in despair after adjustment for demographic characteristics (all P<0.05). Improvements in social support significantly correlated with positive changes in distress (P<0.05). Gains in learned optimism independently correlated with an increase in overall QOL (P<0.01). CONCLUSIONS: In this pilot assessment, changes in pre-defined Pathfinders targets such as coping skills, social support, self-efficacy, spirituality, and optimism correlated with improvements in patient-reported outcomes.
Authors: Amy P Abernethy; Syed Yousuf Zafar; Hope Uronis; Jane L Wheeler; April Coan; Krista Rowe; Rebecca A Shelby; Robin Fowler; James E Herndon Journal: J Pain Symptom Manage Date: 2010-06-25 Impact factor: 3.612
Authors: P J Goodwin; M Leszcz; M Ennis; J Koopmans; L Vincent; H Guther; E Drysdale; M Hundleby; H M Chochinov; M Navarro; M Speca; J Hunter Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2001-12-13 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Amy P Abernethy; James E Herndon; April Coan; Tina Staley; Jane L Wheeler; Krista Rowe; Sophia K Smith; H Shaw; H Kim Lyerly Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2010-02-09 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Amy P Abernethy; James E Herndon; Jane L Wheeler; Meenal Patwardhan; Heather Shaw; H Kim Lyerly; Kevin Weinfurt Journal: Health Serv Res Date: 2008-08-28 Impact factor: 3.402
Authors: D F Cella; D S Tulsky; G Gray; B Sarafian; E Linn; A Bonomi; M Silberman; S B Yellen; P Winicour; J Brannon Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 1993-03 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Allison J Applebaum; Emma M Stein; Jennifer Lord-Bessen; Hayley Pessin; Barry Rosenfeld; William Breitbart Journal: Psychooncology Date: 2013-10-07 Impact factor: 3.894
Authors: H Naik; X Qiu; M C Brown; L Eng; D Pringle; M Mahler; H Hon; K Tiessen; H Thai; V Ho; C Gonos; R Charow; V Pat; M Irwin; L Herzog; A Ho; W Xu; J M Jones; D Howell; G Liu Journal: Curr Oncol Date: 2016-12-21 Impact factor: 3.677
Authors: Neha G Goyal; Beverly J Levine; Kimberly J Van Zee; Elizabeth Naftalis; Nancy E Avis Journal: Breast Cancer Res Treat Date: 2018-01-24 Impact factor: 4.872
Authors: Clark Dumontier; Kerri M Clough-Gorr; Rebecca A Silliman; Andreas E Stuck; André Moser Journal: J Geriatr Oncol Date: 2016-12-13 Impact factor: 3.599
Authors: Mikkael A Sekeres; Jaroslaw P Maciejewski; Alan F List; David P Steensma; Andrew Artz; Arlene S Swern; Paul Scribner; John Huber; Richard Stone Journal: Oncologist Date: 2011-04-08