Literature DB >> 2804845

Bioequivalence of generic aerosol bronchodilators: what are the issues?

M Spino1.   

Abstract

I have attempted to address some critical issues relating to the introduction of generic aerosol bronchodilators in Canada. I approached Genpharm to obtain information on the data submitted to the HPB, including the number of subjects involved, but the company refused to divulge this information because it was concerned about the use of such information by its competitors. In addition to the in-vitro testing conducted by the HPB, should a single pharmacodynamic study be sufficient to demonstrate the safety and efficacy of a drug that serves such a critical role in the prevention of serious illness and possibly death? If so, what will constitute the minimum requirements for the design of such a study? In general, what should be the minimum standards required for safety, efficacy and bioequivalence of aerosol bronchodilators? The next phase rests with the provincial governments. What criteria will they use to determine whether a generic aerosol bronchodilator will be considered bioequivalent? It is essential that the criteria for bioequivalence be developed by experts, and ideally those criteria should be agreed upon and accepted by federal and provincial regulatory bodies before a product is given the status of bioequivalence. Unless such a step is taken it will be difficult to have confidence that products can be considered interchangeable. The issue of interchangeability of aerosol bronchodilators demands immediate attention. Regulatory agencies are caught between those groups with vested interests on both sides. Since patients will either benefit or suffer as a consequence of regulatory decisions, action must be taken to ensure that the best decisions are made. Scientists, clinicians and government officials should convene as soon as possible to formulate a satisfactory approach to this problem of interchangeability. The medical and pharmaceutical professions need reliable information, and patients should not be denied less expensive generic drugs if it can be determined that they are comparable to the innovator's product.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2804845      PMCID: PMC1451469     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  CMAJ        ISSN: 0820-3946            Impact factor:   8.262


  15 in total

1.  Increased rates of illness and death from asthma in Canada.

Authors:  Y Mao; R Semenciw; H Morrison; L MacWilliam; J Davies; D Wigle
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1987-10-01       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 2.  Aerosol deposition considerations in inhalation therapy.

Authors:  S P Newman
Journal:  Chest       Date:  1985-08       Impact factor: 9.410

Review 3.  Therapeutic aerosols 2--Drugs available by the inhaled route.

Authors:  S W Clarke; S P Newman
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  1984-01       Impact factor: 9.139

4.  Asthma mortality in England and Wales: evidence for a further increase, 1974-84.

Authors:  P G Burney
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1986-08-09       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 5.  Control of asthma by aerosols.

Authors:  M T Newhouse; M B Dolovich
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1986-10-02       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  Size aspects of metered-dose inhaler aerosols.

Authors:  C S Kim; D Trujillo; M A Sackner
Journal:  Am Rev Respir Dis       Date:  1985-07

Review 7.  Inhaler use in children with asthma.

Authors:  S Pedersen
Journal:  Dan Med Bull       Date:  1987-10

8.  Effect of particle size of bronchodilator aerosols on lung distribution and pulmonary function in patients with chronic asthma.

Authors:  D M Mitchell; M A Solomon; S E Tolfree; M Short; S G Spiro
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  1987-06       Impact factor: 9.139

9.  Differing bioavailability of salbutamol metered-dose inhalers.

Authors:  S K Chhabra
Journal:  J Asthma       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 2.515

10.  Asthma mortality in New Zealand: a two year national study.

Authors:  M R Sears; H H Rea; R Beaglehole; A J Gillies; P E Holst; T V O'Donnell; R P Rothwell; D C Sutherland
Journal:  N Z Med J       Date:  1985-04-24
View more
  1 in total

1.  Aerosol therapy in Canada: what are the standards?

Authors:  K R Chapman
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1993-03-01       Impact factor: 8.262

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.