| Literature DB >> 28045988 |
Vera Inácio1, Pedro M Barros2, Augusta Costa3,4, Cristóvão Roussado1, Elsa Gonçalves1, Rita Costa3, José Graça5, M Margarida Oliveira2, Leonor Morais-Cecílio1.
Abstract
DNA methylation is thought to influence Quercus suber cork quality, which is the main constraint for its economic valorisation. However, a deep knowledge of the cytosine methylation patterns disclosing the epigenetic variability of trees with different cork quality types is totally missing. This study investigates the hypothesis that variations in DNA methylation contribute to differences in cork cellular characteristics directly related to original or traumatic phellogen activity. We used MSAPs (Methylation Sensitive Amplified Polymorphism) to assess DNA methylation patterns of cork and leaf tissues of Q. suber adult trees growing in three cork oak stands. The relationship between the detected polymorphisms and the diversity of cork quality traits was explored by a marker-trait analysis focusing on the most relevant quality characteristics. Populations differed widely in cork quality, but only slightly in degree of epigenetic differentiation. Four MSAP markers (1.3% of the total) were significantly associated with the most noteworthy quality traits: wood inclusions (nails) and porosity. This evidence supports the potential role of cytosine methylation in the modulation of differential phellogen activity either involved in localized cell death or in pore production, resulting in different cork qualities. Although, the underlying basis of the methylation polymorphism of loci affecting cork quality traits remain unclear, the disclosure of markers statistically associated with cork quality strengthens the potential role of DNA methylation in the regulation of these traits, namely at the phellogen level.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28045988 PMCID: PMC5207400 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0169018
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Material collected in three cork oak populations in distinct edaphoclimatic conditions in Portugal.
| Populations | Geographical Coordinates | Trees | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Virgin cork | Total | |||
| Grândola, Barradas da Serra (BS) | 38 11’ N, 8 37’ W 270 m a.s.l. | 8 | 1 | 9 |
| Montargil, Herdade dos Leitões (HL) | 39 8’ N, 8 11’W 170 m a.s.l. | 11 | 0 | 11 |
| Benavente, Companhia das Lezírias (CL) | 38 49’ N, 8 49’ W 20 m a.s.l. | 10 | 11 | 21 |
a Above sea level
b Number of individuals sampled per population
Thresholds of cork quality traits used for the association study with MSAP markers.
| Cork Quality Trait | Threshold | Reference | Higher cork quality | Lower cork quality |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thickness | 27 mm | [ | Equal or above threshold | Below threshold |
| Annual growth | 3 mm/year | [ | ||
| % ‘nail’ _R | 1% | Outliers | Below threshold | Equal or above threshold |
| % ‘nail’ _Tr | 1% | Outliers | ||
| ‘nail’ Area_R | 3.98 mm2 | Median | ||
| ‘nail’ Area_Tr | 3.99 mm2 | Third Quartile | ||
| % Porosity_Ta | 6% | [ | ||
| % Porosity_R | 6% | [ | ||
| % Porosity_Tr | 6.8% | [ | ||
| Pores Area_Ta | 2.57 | Median | ||
| Pores Area_R | 5 mm2 | [ | ||
| Pores Area_Tr | 4.9 mm2 | [ | ||
| Pores Roundness_Ta | 1.98 | Median | ||
| Pores Roundness_R | 4.03 | Median | ||
| Pores Roundness_Tr | 4.56 | Median | ||
| Pores Length_Ta | 2.5 | Median | ||
| Pores Length_R | 5 mm | [ | ||
| Pores Length_Tr | 5 mm | [ |
a Cork quality traits measured in all sections were allocated into 2 classes—higher cork quality and lower cork quality—by applying a defined threshold according to trait data distribution or previously reported values, and taking into account their shape in each section.
R—radial section; Tr—transverse section; Ta–tangential section.
Epigenetic diversity of cork and leaf tissues within the three cork oak populations.
| Tissue | u- | m- | h- | Total PL |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| No./%PL | No./%PL | No./%PL | ||
| 161/34.1 | 106/27.3 | 72/12.5 | 339 | |
| 133/25.1 | 108/37.5 | 62/10.2 | 303 |
u-loci–unmethylated loci; m-loci–methylated loci; h-loci–hemi-methylated loci; No.–number of polymorphic loci; %PL–Percentage of polymorphic loci; Total PL–Number of total polymorphic loci.
Fig 1Principal Coordinate Analysis representing epigenetic differentiation between populations and tissues.
Graphical representation is based on the first two coordinates (PCO1 and PCO2) with the percentage of the variability shown between brackets. Inverted triangles represent trees from Herdade dos Leitões (HL), circles represent Barradas da Serra (BS) and squares represent Companhia das Lezírias (CL). The labels represent the centroid for the points cloud in each population and the ellipses represent the dispersion of those points around the centroid.
Fig 2Principal Coordinate Analysis representing epigenetic differentiation in cork (A) and leaf (B) tissues, between trees producing virgin cork (V) and Graphical representation is based on the first two coordinates (PCO1 and PCO2) with the percentage of the variability explained shown between brackets. Triangles represent ‘virgin’ cork producing trees and diamonds amadia cork producing trees. The labels represent the centroid for the points cloud in each population and the ellipses represent the dispersion of those points around the centroid.
Fig 3Boxplots representing the distribution of pores roundness.
(A) in transverse section (Tr) and (B) tangential section (Ta) in samples from amadia cork planks collected from the three populations: Companhia das Lezírias (CL), Barradas da Serra (BS) and Herdade dos Leitões (HL).
Statistically significant logistic regressions relating cork quality traits and MSAP marker presence.
| MSAP marker | Restriction site methylation state | Cork quality trait | Significance of MSAP marker effect | Odds | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| C4_487 | Hemi-methylated | % ‘Nails’_Tr | 0.00094 | 0.0681 | 0.95 | 20.0 |
| C1_175 | Unmethylated | Pore area_Tr | 0.00020 | 0.0140 | 0.31 | 0.44 |
| % Porosity_R | 0.00054 | 0.0237 | 0.12 | 0.14 | ||
| Methylated | Pore area_Tr | 0.00020 | 0.0140 | 0.94 | 15.0 | |
| % Porosity_R | 0.00054 | 0.0237 | 0.50 | 1.00 | ||
| C2_101 | Unmethylated | Pore area_Tr | 0.00002 | 0.0040 | 0.27 | 0.36 |
| C1_296 | Unmethylated | Pore area_Tr | 0.00056 | 0.0293 | 0.18 | 0.22 |
Generalized linear models were fitted to higher cork quality presence data browsed for the N = 29 amadia cork samples (see Table 3 for details), using a logit link model and assuming fixed effects for MSAP marker.
a Likelihood ratio tests to verify the null hypothesis of no effects of the marker were performed.
b Largest q-value leading to an expectation of less or equal than one falsely significant model [i.e. q-value x (number of models accepted as significant) ≤1].
c Estimated probability of success (higher cork quality), when MSAP marker is present.
d The estimated odds to obtain higher cork quality (success) when the marker is present is .
R—radial section; Tr—transverse section