Literature DB >> 23365240

High-learners present larger mid-frontal theta power and connectivity in response to incorrect performance feedback.

Caroline Di Bernardi Luft1, Guido Nolte, Joydeep Bhattacharya.   

Abstract

A crucial aspect of cognitive control and learning is the ability to integrate feedback, that is, to evaluate action outcomes and their deviations from the intended goals and to adjust behavior accordingly. However, how high-learners differ from low-learners in relation to feedback processing has not been characterized. Further, little is known about the underlying brain connectivity patterns during feedback processing. This study aimed to fill these gaps by analyzing electrical brain responses from healthy adult human participants while they performed a time estimation task with correct and incorrect feedback. As compared with low-learners, high-learners presented larger mid-frontal theta (4-8 Hz) oscillations and lower sensorimotor beta (17-24 Hz) oscillations in response to incorrect feedback. Further, high-learners showed larger theta connectivity from left central, associated with motor activity, to mid-frontal, associated with performance monitoring, immediately after feedback (0-0.3 s), followed by (from 0.3 to 0.6 s after feedback) a flux from mid-frontal to prefrontal, associated with executive functioning. We suggest that these results reflect two cognitive processes related to successful feedback processing: first, the obtained feedback is compared with the expected one, and second, the feedback history is updated based on this information. Our results also indicate that high- and low-learners differ not only on how they react to incorrect feedback, but also in relation to how their distant brain areas interact while processing both correct and incorrect feedback. This study demonstrates the neural underpinnings of individual differences in goal-directed adaptive behavior.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23365240      PMCID: PMC6619102          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2565-12.2013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  20 in total

1.  Genetic influences on functional connectivity associated with feedback processing and prediction error: Phase coupling of theta-band oscillations in twins.

Authors:  Şükrü Barış Demiral; Simon Golosheykin; Andrey P Anokhin
Journal:  Int J Psychophysiol       Date:  2016-12-31       Impact factor: 2.997

2.  Electrophysiological measures reveal the role of anterior cingulate cortex in learning from unreliable feedback.

Authors:  Peng Li; Weiwei Peng; Hong Li; Clay B Holroyd
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 3.282

3.  Positive and negative feedback learning and associated dopamine and serotonin transporter binding after methamphetamine.

Authors:  Alexandra Stolyarova; Steve J O'Dell; John F Marshall; Alicia Izquierdo
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2014-06-21       Impact factor: 3.332

4.  Willing to wait: Elevated reward-processing EEG activity associated with a greater preference for larger-but-delayed rewards.

Authors:  Narun Pornpattananangkul; Robin Nusslock
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2016-07-29       Impact factor: 3.139

5.  Behavioral preference in sequential decision-making and its association with anxiety.

Authors:  Dandan Zhang; Ruolei Gu
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2018-02-21       Impact factor: 5.038

6.  Motor Interference, But Not Sensory Interference, Increases Midfrontal Theta Activity and Brain Synchronization during Reactive Control.

Authors:  Jakob Kaiser; Simone Schütz-Bosbach
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2021-01-13       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Oscillatory Dynamics of Feedback Processing in Adolescents with Prenatal Cocaine Exposure.

Authors:  Kristen P Morie; Jia Wu; Nicole Landi; Marc N Potenza; Linda C Mayes; Michael J Crowley
Journal:  Dev Neuropsychol       Date:  2019-07-28       Impact factor: 2.253

8.  HERMES: towards an integrated toolbox to characterize functional and effective brain connectivity.

Authors:  Guiomar Niso; Ricardo Bruña; Ernesto Pereda; Ricardo Gutiérrez; Ricardo Bajo; Fernando Maestú; Francisco del-Pozo
Journal:  Neuroinformatics       Date:  2013-10

9.  Brain-state determines learning improvements after transcranial alternating-current stimulation to frontal cortex.

Authors:  John Nguyen; Yuqi Deng; Robert M G Reinhart
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2018-02-17       Impact factor: 8.955

10.  Disruption and rescue of interareal theta phase coupling and adaptive behavior.

Authors:  Robert M G Reinhart
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-10-09       Impact factor: 11.205

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.