AIMS: Diabetes mellitus can inhibit cytochrome P450 3A4, an enzyme responsible for the metabolism of nifedipine, used for the treatment of hypertension in pregnant women. We aimed to assess the effect of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) on the pharmacokinetics, placental transfer and distribution of nifedipine in amniotic fluid in hypertensive pregnant women. METHODS: The study was conducted in 12 hypertensive pregnant women [control group (CG)] and 10 hypertensive pregnant women with T2DM taking slow-release nifedipine (20 mg, 12/12 h). On the 34th week of gestation, serial blood samples were collected (0-12 h) after administration of the medication. At delivery, samples of maternal and fetal blood and amniotic fluid were collected for determination of nifedipine distribution in these compartments. RESULTS: The median pharmacokinetic parameters of CG were: peak plasma concentration (Cmax ) 26.41 ng ml-1 , time to reach Cmax (tmax ) 1.79 h, area under the plasma concentration vs. time curve from 0-12 h (AUC0-12 ) 235.99 ng.h ml-1 , half-life (t½) 4.34 h, volume of distribution divided by bioavailability (Vd/F) 560.96 l, and ClT /F 84.77 l h-1 . The parameters for T2DM group were: Cmax 23.52 ng ml-1 , tmax 1.48 h, AUC0-12 202.23 ng.h ml-1 , t½ 5.00 h, Vd/F 609.40 l, and apparent total clearance (ClT /F) 98.94 l h-1 . The ratios of plasma concentrations of nifedipine in the umbilical vein, intervillous space and amniotic fluid to those in the maternal vein for CG and T2DM were 0.53 and 0.44, 0.78 and 0.87, respectively, with an amniotic fluid/maternal plasma ratio of 0.05 for both groups. The ratios of plasma concentrations in the umbilical artery to those in the umbilical vein were 0.82 for CG and 0.88 for T2DM. CONCLUSIONS: There was no influence of T2DM on the pharmacokinetics or placental transfer of nifedipine in hypertensive women with controlled diabetes.
AIMS: Diabetes mellitus can inhibit cytochrome P450 3A4, an enzyme responsible for the metabolism of nifedipine, used for the treatment of hypertension in pregnant women. We aimed to assess the effect of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) on the pharmacokinetics, placental transfer and distribution of nifedipine in amniotic fluid in hypertensive pregnant women. METHODS: The study was conducted in 12 hypertensive pregnant women [control group (CG)] and 10 hypertensive pregnant women with T2DM taking slow-release nifedipine (20 mg, 12/12 h). On the 34th week of gestation, serial blood samples were collected (0-12 h) after administration of the medication. At delivery, samples of maternal and fetal blood and amniotic fluid were collected for determination of nifedipine distribution in these compartments. RESULTS: The median pharmacokinetic parameters of CG were: peak plasma concentration (Cmax ) 26.41 ng ml-1 , time to reach Cmax (tmax ) 1.79 h, area under the plasma concentration vs. time curve from 0-12 h (AUC0-12 ) 235.99 ng.h ml-1 , half-life (t½) 4.34 h, volume of distribution divided by bioavailability (Vd/F) 560.96 l, and ClT /F 84.77 l h-1 . The parameters for T2DM group were: Cmax 23.52 ng ml-1 , tmax 1.48 h, AUC0-12 202.23 ng.h ml-1 , t½ 5.00 h, Vd/F 609.40 l, and apparent total clearance (ClT /F) 98.94 l h-1 . The ratios of plasma concentrations of nifedipine in the umbilical vein, intervillous space and amniotic fluid to those in the maternal vein for CG and T2DM were 0.53 and 0.44, 0.78 and 0.87, respectively, with an amniotic fluid/maternal plasma ratio of 0.05 for both groups. The ratios of plasma concentrations in the umbilical artery to those in the umbilical vein were 0.82 for CG and 0.88 for T2DM. CONCLUSIONS: There was no influence of T2DM on the pharmacokinetics or placental transfer of nifedipine in hypertensivewomen with controlled diabetes.
Authors: Stephen Ph Alexander; Doriano Fabbro; Eamonn Kelly; Neil Marrion; John A Peters; Helen E Benson; Elena Faccenda; Adam J Pawson; Joanna L Sharman; Christopher Southan; Jamie A Davies Journal: Br J Pharmacol Date: 2015-12 Impact factor: 8.739
Authors: Elaine Christine Dantas Moisés; Luciana de Barros Duarte; Ricardo de Carvalho Cavalli; Maria Paula Marques; Vera Lúcia Lanchote; Geraldo Duarte; Sérgio Pereira da Cunha Journal: Eur J Clin Pharmacol Date: 2008-08-06 Impact factor: 2.953
Authors: Christopher Southan; Joanna L Sharman; Helen E Benson; Elena Faccenda; Adam J Pawson; Stephen P H Alexander; O Peter Buneman; Anthony P Davenport; John C McGrath; John A Peters; Michael Spedding; William A Catterall; Doriano Fabbro; Jamie A Davies Journal: Nucleic Acids Res Date: 2015-10-12 Impact factor: 16.971
Authors: Ian R Mulrenin; Julian E Garcia; Muluneh M Fashe; Matthew Shane Loop; Melissa A Daubert; Rachel Peragallo Urrutia; Craig R Lee Journal: Expert Opin Drug Metab Toxicol Date: 2021-11 Impact factor: 4.481
Authors: Dylan van de Vusse; Paola Mian; Sam Schoenmakers; Robert B Flint; Willy Visser; Karel Allegaert; Jorie Versmissen Journal: Eur J Clin Pharmacol Date: 2022-09-15 Impact factor: 3.064