Monira Alwhaibi1,2, Usha Sambamoorthi1, Suresh Madhavan1, Thomas Bias3, Kimberly Kelly1, James Walkup4. 1. Department of Pharmaceutical Systems and Policy, School of Pharmacy, West Virginia University, Morgantown, West Virginia 2. Department of Clinical Pharmacy, School of Pharmacy, King Saud University, Saudi Arabia 3. Department of Health Policy, Management, and Leadership, School of Public Health, West Virginia University, Morgantown, West Virginia 4. Clinical Psychology Department, Graduate School of Applied and Professional Psychology, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, New Jersey
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Elderly individuals (age >65 years) with cancer are at high risk for newly diagnosed depression after a cancer diagnosis. It is not known whether the risk of newly diagnosed depression varies by cancer type. PURPOSE: To examine the variations in the risk of newly diagnosed depression by cancer type among elderly individuals with cancer. METHODS: This study used a retrospective cohort study design and data from the linked SEER-Medicare files. Elderly individuals (age >65 years) with incident breast, colorectal (CRC), and prostate cancers diagnosed between 2007 and 2011 (N=53,821) were followed for 12 months after cancer diagnosis. Depression diagnosis was identified during the 12-month follow-up period after cancer diagnosis using the ICD-9-Clinical Modification. Complementary log-log regression was used to examine the association between cancer type and risk of newly diagnosed depression after adjusting for other risk factors for depression. RESULTS: We found a significantly higher percentage of newly diagnosed depression among women with CRC compared with those with breast cancer (5.8% vs 3.9%), and among men with CRC compared with those with prostate cancer (3.4% vs 1.6%). In the adjusted analysis, women with CRC had a 28.0% higher risk of newly diagnosed depression compared with women with breast cancer (adjusted risk ratio [ARR], 1.28; 95% CI, 1.12-1.46) and men with CRC had a 104.0% higher risk of newly diagnosed depression compared with those with prostate cancer (ARR, 2.04; 95% CI, 1.65-2.51). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings identified cancer types associated with a high risk of newly diagnosed depression after cancer diagnosis, who might benefit from routine depression screening to help in its early detection and treatment.
BACKGROUND: Elderly individuals (age >65 years) with cancer are at high risk for newly diagnosed depression after a cancer diagnosis. It is not known whether the risk of newly diagnosed depression varies by cancer type. PURPOSE: To examine the variations in the risk of newly diagnosed depression by cancer type among elderly individuals with cancer. METHODS: This study used a retrospective cohort study design and data from the linked SEER-Medicare files. Elderly individuals (age >65 years) with incident breast, colorectal (CRC), and prostate cancers diagnosed between 2007 and 2011 (N=53,821) were followed for 12 months after cancer diagnosis. Depression diagnosis was identified during the 12-month follow-up period after cancer diagnosis using the ICD-9-Clinical Modification. Complementary log-log regression was used to examine the association between cancer type and risk of newly diagnosed depression after adjusting for other risk factors for depression. RESULTS: We found a significantly higher percentage of newly diagnosed depression among women with CRC compared with those with breast cancer (5.8% vs 3.9%), and among men with CRC compared with those with prostate cancer (3.4% vs 1.6%). In the adjusted analysis, women with CRC had a 28.0% higher risk of newly diagnosed depression compared with women with breast cancer (adjusted risk ratio [ARR], 1.28; 95% CI, 1.12-1.46) and men with CRC had a 104.0% higher risk of newly diagnosed depression compared with those with prostate cancer (ARR, 2.04; 95% CI, 1.65-2.51). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings identified cancer types associated with a high risk of newly diagnosed depression after cancer diagnosis, who might benefit from routine depression screening to help in its early detection and treatment.
Authors: Ayse Akincigil; Mark Olfson; James T Walkup; Michele J Siegel; Ece Kalay; Shahla Amin; Karen A Zurlo; Stephen Crystal Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2011-06-07 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Zhiyuan Zheng; K Robin Yabroff; Gery P Guy; Xuesong Han; Chunyu Li; Matthew P Banegas; Donatus U Ekwueme; Ahmedin Jemal Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2015-12-24 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: Carrie N Klabunde; Paul K J Han; Craig C Earle; Tenbroeck Smith; John Z Ayanian; Richard Lee; Anita Ambs; Julia H Rowland; Arnold L Potosky Journal: Fam Med Date: 2013 Jul-Aug Impact factor: 1.756
Authors: Richard A Goodman; Samuel F Posner; Elbert S Huang; Anand K Parekh; Howard K Koh Journal: Prev Chronic Dis Date: 2013-04-25 Impact factor: 2.830
Authors: Turky H Almigbal; Khalid M Almutairi; Jack B Fu; Jason M Vinluan; Eyad Alhelih; Wadi B Alonazi; Mohammed Ali Batais; Abdulaziz A Alodhayani; Murad A Mubaraki Journal: Psychol Res Behav Manag Date: 2019-08-20
Authors: Sandra Silva; Ana Bártolo; Isabel M Santos; Anabela Pereira; Sara Monteiro Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2022-03-14 Impact factor: 3.390