Literature DB >> 26705361

Annual Medical Expenditure and Productivity Loss Among Colorectal, Female Breast, and Prostate Cancer Survivors in the United States.

Zhiyuan Zheng1, K Robin Yabroff1, Gery P Guy1, Xuesong Han1, Chunyu Li1, Matthew P Banegas1, Donatus U Ekwueme1, Ahmedin Jemal1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: There are limited nationally representative estimates of the annual economic burden among survivors of the three most prevalent cancers (colorectal, female breast, and prostate) in both nonelderly and elderly populations in the United States.
METHODS: The 2008 to 2012 Medical Expenditure Panel Survey data were used to identify colorectal (n = 540), female breast (n = 1568), and prostate (n = 1170) cancer survivors and individuals without a cancer history (n = 109 423). Excess economic burden attributable to cancer included per-person excess annual medical expenditures and productivity losses (employment disability, missed work days, and days stayed in bed). All analyses were stratified by cancer site and age (nonelderly: 18-64 years vs elderly: ≥ 65 years). Multivariable analyses controlled for age, sex, race/ethnicity, marital status, education, number of comorbidities, and geographic region. All statistical tests were two-sided.
RESULTS: Compared with individuals without a cancer history, cancer survivors experienced annual excess medical expenditures (for the nonelderly population, colorectal: $8647, 95% confidence interval [CI] = $4932 to $13 974, P < .001; breast: $5119, 95% CI = $3439 to $7158, P < .001; prostate: $3586, 95% CI = $1792 to $6076, P < .001; for the elderly population, colorectal: $4913, 95% CI = $2768 to $7470, P < .001; breast: $2288, 95% CI = $814 to $3995, P = .002; prostate: $3524, 95% CI = $1539 to $5909, P < .001). Nonelderly colorectal and breast cancer survivors experienced statistically significant annual excess employment disability (13.6%, P < .001, and 4.8%, P = .001) and productivity loss at work (7.2 days, P < .001, and 3.3 days, P = .002) and at home (4.5 days, P < .001, and 3.3 days, P = .003). In contrast, elderly survivors of all three cancer sites had comparable productivity losses as those without a cancer history.
CONCLUSIONS: Colorectal, breast, and prostate cancer survivors experienced statistically significantly higher economic burden compared with individuals without a cancer history; however, excess economic burden varies by cancer site and age. Targeted efforts will be important in reducing the economic burden of colorectal, breast, and prostate cancer.
© The Author 2015. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26705361      PMCID: PMC4849808          DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djv382

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst        ISSN: 0027-8874            Impact factor:   13.506


  38 in total

1.  Patient time costs associated with cancer care.

Authors:  K Robin Yabroff; William W Davis; Elizabeth B Lamont; Angela Fahey; Marie Topor; Martin L Brown; Joan L Warren
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2007-01-03       Impact factor: 13.506

2.  Principles of good practice for budget impact analysis: report of the ISPOR Task Force on good research practices--budget impact analysis.

Authors:  Josephine A Mauskopf; Sean D Sullivan; Lieven Annemans; Jaime Caro; C Daniel Mullins; Mark Nuijten; Ewa Orlewska; John Watkins; Paul Trueman
Journal:  Value Health       Date:  2007 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 5.725

3.  Estimating the cost of cancer care in the United States: a work very much in progress.

Authors:  Joseph Lipscomb
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2008-04-29       Impact factor: 13.506

4.  Differences in initial treatment patterns and outcomes of lung cancer in the elderly.

Authors:  T J Smith; L Penberthy; C E Desch; M Whittemore; C Newschaffer; B E Hillner; D McClish; S M Retchin
Journal:  Lung Cancer       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 5.705

5.  Ten-year survival and cost following breast cancer recurrence: estimates from SEER-medicare data.

Authors:  Michael E Stokes; David Thompson; Eduardo L Montoya; Milton C Weinstein; Eric P Winer; Craig C Earle
Journal:  Value Health       Date:  2008 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 5.725

6.  Colon cancer treatment costs for Medicare and dually eligible beneficiaries.

Authors:  Zhehui Luo; Cathy J Bradley; Bassam A Dahman; Joseph C Gardiner
Journal:  Health Care Financ Rev       Date:  2010

Review 7.  The costs of treating breast cancer in the US: a synthesis of published evidence.

Authors:  Jonathan D Campbell; Scott D Ramsey
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 4.981

8.  Overview of methods to estimate the medical costs of cancer.

Authors:  William E Barlow
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 2.983

9.  Cost of care for elderly cancer patients in the United States.

Authors:  K Robin Yabroff; Elizabeth B Lamont; Angela Mariotto; Joan L Warren; Marie Topor; Angela Meekins; Martin L Brown
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2008-04-29       Impact factor: 13.506

View more
  46 in total

Review 1.  [Evidence in minimally invasive oncological surgery of the colon and rectum].

Authors:  Carolin Kastner; Joachim Reibetanz; Christoph-Thomas Germer; Armin Wiegering
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2021-04       Impact factor: 0.955

Review 2.  Pharmacologic Management of Cancer Therapeutics-Induced Cardiomyopathy in Adult Cancer Survivors.

Authors:  J Emanuel Finet; Gregory A Wiggers
Journal:  Curr Heart Fail Rep       Date:  2018-08

3.  Work after prostate cancer: a systematic review.

Authors:  Vanette McLennan; Dominika Ludvik; Suzanne Chambers; Mark Frydenberg
Journal:  J Cancer Surviv       Date:  2019-03-21       Impact factor: 4.442

Review 4.  Personalized Risk-Stratified Cancer Follow-Up Care: Its Potential for Healthier Survivors, Happier Clinicians, and Lower Costs.

Authors:  Deborah K Mayer; Catherine M Alfano
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2019-05-01       Impact factor: 13.506

5.  Association of worry about cancer to benefit finding and functioning in long-term cancer survivors.

Authors:  Salene M W Jones; Rebecca Ziebell; Rod Walker; Larissa Nekhlyudov; Borsika A Rabin; Stephanie Nutt; Monica Fujii; Jessica Chubak
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2016-12-15       Impact factor: 3.603

6.  Cancer Type and Risk of Newly Diagnosed Depression Among Elderly Medicare Beneficiaries With Incident Breast, Colorectal, and Prostate Cancers.

Authors:  Monira Alwhaibi; Usha Sambamoorthi; Suresh Madhavan; Thomas Bias; Kimberly Kelly; James Walkup
Journal:  J Natl Compr Canc Netw       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 11.908

7.  Cost Effectiveness of Nutrition Policies on Processed Meat: Implications for Cancer Burden in the U.S.

Authors:  David D Kim; Parke E Wilde; Dominique S Michaud; Junxiu Liu; Lauren Lizewski; Jennifer Onopa; Dariush Mozaffarian; Fang Fang Zhang; John B Wong
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2019-09-26       Impact factor: 5.043

Review 8.  Friction Cost Estimates of Productivity Costs in Cost-of-Illness Studies in Comparison with Human Capital Estimates: A Review.

Authors:  Jamison Pike; Scott D Grosse
Journal:  Appl Health Econ Health Policy       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 2.561

9.  Estimating Costs of Care Attributable to Cancer: Does the Choice of Comparison Group Matter?

Authors:  Aileen B Chen; Ling Li; Angel M Cronin; Gabriel A Brooks; Brian D Kavanagh; Deborah Schrag
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2017-08-31       Impact factor: 3.402

10.  Exploring barriers to the receipt of necessary medical care among cancer survivors under age 65 years.

Authors:  Matthew P Banegas; John F Dickerson; Erin E Kent; Janet S de Moor; Katherine S Virgo; Gery P Guy; Donatus U Ekwueme; Zhiyuan Zheng; Stephanie Nutt; Loyce Pace; Alexandra Varga; Lisa Waiwaiole; Jennifer Schneider; K Robin Yabroff
Journal:  J Cancer Surviv       Date:  2017-08-29       Impact factor: 4.442

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.