Angel D Davalos1, Thomas J Luben2, Amy H Herring1, Jason D Sacks3. 1. Department of Biostatistics, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill. 2. National Center for Environmental Assessment, Office of Research and Development, US Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, NC. 3. National Center for Environmental Assessment, Office of Research and Development, US Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, NC. Electronic address: sacks.jason@epa.gov.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Air pollution epidemiology traditionally focuses on the relationship between individual air pollutants and health outcomes (e.g., mortality). To account for potential copollutant confounding, individual pollutant associations are often estimated by adjusting or controlling for other pollutants in the mixture. Recently, the need to characterize the relationship between health outcomes and the larger multipollutant mixture has been emphasized in an attempt to better protect public health and inform more sustainable air quality management decisions. METHODS: New and innovative statistical methods to examine multipollutant exposures were identified through a broad literature search, with a specific focus on those statistical approaches currently used in epidemiologic studies of short-term exposures to criteria air pollutants (i.e., particulate matter, carbon monoxide, sulfur dioxide, nitrogen dioxide, and ozone). RESULTS: Five broad classes of statistical approaches were identified for examining associations between short-term multipollutant exposures and health outcomes, specifically additive main effects, effect measure modification, unsupervised dimension reduction, supervised dimension reduction, and nonparametric methods. These approaches are characterized including advantages and limitations in different epidemiologic scenarios. DISCUSSION: By highlighting the characteristics of various studies in which multipollutant statistical methods have been used, this review provides epidemiologists and biostatisticians with a resource to aid in the selection of the most optimal statistical method to use when examining multipollutant exposures. Published by Elsevier Inc.
PURPOSE: Air pollution epidemiology traditionally focuses on the relationship between individual air pollutants and health outcomes (e.g., mortality). To account for potential copollutant confounding, individual pollutant associations are often estimated by adjusting or controlling for other pollutants in the mixture. Recently, the need to characterize the relationship between health outcomes and the larger multipollutant mixture has been emphasized in an attempt to better protect public health and inform more sustainable air quality management decisions. METHODS: New and innovative statistical methods to examine multipollutant exposures were identified through a broad literature search, with a specific focus on those statistical approaches currently used in epidemiologic studies of short-term exposures to criteria air pollutants (i.e., particulate matter, carbon monoxide, sulfur dioxide, nitrogen dioxide, and ozone). RESULTS: Five broad classes of statistical approaches were identified for examining associations between short-term multipollutant exposures and health outcomes, specifically additive main effects, effect measure modification, unsupervised dimension reduction, supervised dimension reduction, and nonparametric methods. These approaches are characterized including advantages and limitations in different epidemiologic scenarios. DISCUSSION: By highlighting the characteristics of various studies in which multipollutant statistical methods have been used, this review provides epidemiologists and biostatisticians with a resource to aid in the selection of the most optimal statistical method to use when examining multipollutant exposures. Published by Elsevier Inc.
Entities:
Keywords:
Air pollution health effects; Differential effects; Dimension reduction; Interactions; Joint effects; Multipollutant; Nonparametric methods
Authors: Jonathan S Schildcrout; Lianne Sheppard; Thomas Lumley; James C Slaughter; Jane Q Koenig; Gail G Shapiro Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 2006-06-23 Impact factor: 4.897
Authors: Duncan C Thomas; Michael Jerrett; Nino Kuenzli; Thomas A Louis; Francesca Dominici; Scott Zeger; Joel Schwarz; Richard T Burnett; Daniel Krewski; David Bates Journal: J Toxicol Environ Health A Date: 2007-02-01
Authors: JeanClare Seagrave; Jacob D McDonald; Edward Bedrick; Eric S Edgerton; Andrew P Gigliotti; John J Jansen; Lin Ke; Luke P Naeher; Steven K Seilkop; Mei Zheng; Joe L Mauderly Journal: Environ Health Perspect Date: 2006-09 Impact factor: 9.031
Authors: Zhichao Sun; Yebin Tao; Shi Li; Kelly K Ferguson; John D Meeker; Sung Kyun Park; Stuart A Batterman; Bhramar Mukherjee Journal: Environ Health Date: 2013-10-04 Impact factor: 5.984
Authors: Thomas J Luben; Barbara J Buckley; Molini M Patel; Tina Stevens; Evan Coffman; Kristen M Rappazzo; Elizabeth O Owens; Erin P Hines; Danielle Moore; Kyle Painter; Ryan Jones; Laura Datko-Williams; Adrien A Wilkie; Meagan Madden; Jennifer Richmond-Bryant Journal: Environ Res Date: 2017-11-13 Impact factor: 6.498
Authors: Alexandra Larsen; Viktoria Kolpacoff; Kara McCormack; Victoria Seewaldt; Terry Hyslop Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2020-08-20 Impact factor: 4.254
Authors: Sheena E Martenies; William B Allshouse; Anne P Starling; Brandy M Ringham; Deborah H Glueck; John L Adgate; Dana Dabelea; Sheryl Magzamen Journal: Environ Epidemiol Date: 2019-04