Eric Coker1, Silvia Liverani2, Jason G Su3, John Molitor4. 1. School of Public Health, University of California at Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, USA. 2. School of Mathematical Sciences, Queen Mary University of London, Mile End Road, London, E1 4NS, UK. 3. Environmental Health Sciences, School of Public Health, University of California at Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, 94720-7360, USA. 4. School of Biological and Population Health Sciences, College of Public Health and Human Sciences, Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon, USA. john.molitor@oregonstate.edu.
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The inter-correlated nature of exposure-based risk factors in environmental health studies makes it a challenge to determine their combined effect on health outcomes. As such, there has been much research of late regarding the development and utilization of methods in the field of multi-pollutant modeling. However, much of this work has focused on issues related to variable selection in a regression context, with the goal of identifying which exposures are the "bad actors" most responsible for affecting the health outcome of interest. However, the question addressed by these approaches does not necessarily represent the only or most important questions of interest in a multi-pollutant modeling context, where researchers may be interested in health effects from co-exposure patterns and in identifying subpopulations associated with patterns defined by different levels of constituent exposures. RECENT FINDINGS: One approach to analyzing multi-pollutant data is to use a method known as Bayesian profile regression, which aids in identifying susceptible subpopulations associated with exposure mixtures defined by different levels of each exposure. Identification of exposure-level patterns that correspond to a location may provide a starting point for policy-based exposure reduction. Also, in a spatial context, identification of locations with the most health-relevant exposure-mixture profiles might provide further policy relevant information. In this brief report, we review and describe an approach that can be used to identify exposures in subpopulations or locations known as Bayesian profile regression. An example is provided in which we examine associations between air pollutants, an indicator of healthy food retailer availability, and indicators of poverty in Los Angeles County. A general tread suggesting that vulnerable individuals are more highly exposed and have limited access to healthy food retailers is observed, though the associations are complex and non-linear.
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The inter-correlated nature of exposure-based risk factors in environmental health studies makes it a challenge to determine their combined effect on health outcomes. As such, there has been much research of late regarding the development and utilization of methods in the field of multi-pollutant modeling. However, much of this work has focused on issues related to variable selection in a regression context, with the goal of identifying which exposures are the "bad actors" most responsible for affecting the health outcome of interest. However, the question addressed by these approaches does not necessarily represent the only or most important questions of interest in a multi-pollutant modeling context, where researchers may be interested in health effects from co-exposure patterns and in identifying subpopulations associated with patterns defined by different levels of constituent exposures. RECENT FINDINGS: One approach to analyzing multi-pollutant data is to use a method known as Bayesian profile regression, which aids in identifying susceptible subpopulations associated with exposure mixtures defined by different levels of each exposure. Identification of exposure-level patterns that correspond to a location may provide a starting point for policy-based exposure reduction. Also, in a spatial context, identification of locations with the most health-relevant exposure-mixture profiles might provide further policy relevant information. In this brief report, we review and describe an approach that can be used to identify exposures in subpopulations or locations known as Bayesian profile regression. An example is provided in which we examine associations between air pollutants, an indicator of healthy food retailer availability, and indicators of poverty in Los Angeles County. A general tread suggesting that vulnerable individuals are more highly exposed and have limited access to healthy food retailers is observed, though the associations are complex and non-linear.
Keywords:
Bayesian profile regression; Health effects; Health policy; Multi-pollutant modeling; Susceptible subpopulations
Authors: Jason G Su; Rachel Morello-Frosch; Bill M Jesdale; Amy D Kyle; Bhavna Shamasunder; Michael Jerrett Journal: Environ Sci Technol Date: 2009-10-15 Impact factor: 9.028
Authors: Eric Coker; Silvia Liverani; Jo Kay Ghosh; Michael Jerrett; Bernardo Beckerman; Arthur Li; Beate Ritz; John Molitor Journal: Environ Int Date: 2016-02-15 Impact factor: 9.621
Authors: Silvia Regina Dias Medici Saldiva; Ligia Vizeu Barrozo; Clea Rodrigues Leone; Marcelo Antunes Failla; Eliana de Aquino Bonilha; Regina Tomie Ivata Bernal; Regiani Carvalho de Oliveira; Paulo Hilário Nascimento Saldiva Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2018-10-12 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Sara T Humes; Nicole Iovine; Cindy Prins; Timothy J Garrett; John A Lednicky; Eric S Coker; Tara Sabo-Attwood Journal: Respir Res Date: 2022-07-02
Authors: Alexandra Larsen; Viktoria Kolpacoff; Kara McCormack; Victoria Seewaldt; Terry Hyslop Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2020-08-20 Impact factor: 4.254
Authors: Aurore Lavigne; Anna Freni-Sterrantino; Daniela Fecht; Silvia Liverani; Marta Blangiardo; Kees de Hoogh; John Molitor; Anna L Hansell Journal: Environ Epidemiol Date: 2020-07-16