Literature DB >> 28035651

High quality NMR structures: a new force field with implicit water and membrane solvation for Xplor-NIH.

Ye Tian1, Charles D Schwieters2, Stanley J Opella3, Francesca M Marassi4.   

Abstract

Structure determination of proteins by NMR is unique in its ability to measure restraints, very accurately, in environments and under conditions that closely mimic those encountered in vivo. For example, advances in solid-state NMR methods enable structure determination of membrane proteins in detergent-free lipid bilayers, and of large soluble proteins prepared by sedimentation, while parallel advances in solution NMR methods and optimization of detergent-free lipid nanodiscs are rapidly pushing the envelope of the size limit for both soluble and membrane proteins. These experimental advantages, however, are partially squandered during structure calculation, because the commonly used force fields are purely repulsive and neglect solvation, Van der Waals forces and electrostatic energy. Here we describe a new force field, and updated energy functions, for protein structure calculations with EEFx implicit solvation, electrostatics, and Van der Waals Lennard-Jones forces, in the widely used program Xplor-NIH. The new force field is based primarily on CHARMM22, facilitating calculations with a wider range of biomolecules. The new EEFx energy function has been rewritten to enable OpenMP parallelism, and optimized to enhance computation efficiency. It implements solvation, electrostatics, and Van der Waals energy terms together, thus ensuring more consistent and efficient computation of the complete nonbonded energy lists. Updates in the related python module allow detailed analysis of the interaction energies and associated parameters. The new force field and energy function work with both soluble proteins and membrane proteins, including those with cofactors or engineered tags, and are very effective in situations where there are sparse experimental restraints. Results obtained for NMR-restrained calculations with a set of five soluble proteins and five membrane proteins show that structures calculated with EEFx have significant improvements in accuracy, precision, and conformation, and that structure refinement can be obtained by short relaxation with EEFx to obtain improvements in these key metrics. These developments broaden the range of biomolecular structures that can be calculated with high fidelity from NMR restraints.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Eefx; Force field; Implicit solvent; Membrane protein; Structure calculation

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 28035651      PMCID: PMC5487259          DOI: 10.1007/s10858-016-0082-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomol NMR        ISSN: 0925-2738            Impact factor:   2.835


  75 in total

1.  Comparison of protein solution structures refined by molecular dynamics simulation in vacuum, with a generalized Born model, and with explicit water.

Authors:  Bin Xia; Vickie Tsui; David A Case; H Jane Dyson; Peter E Wright
Journal:  J Biomol NMR       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 2.835

2.  Native protein sequences are close to optimal for their structures.

Authors:  B Kuhlman; D Baker
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-09-12       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  The Xplor-NIH NMR molecular structure determination package.

Authors:  Charles D Schwieters; John J Kuszewski; Nico Tjandra; G Marius Clore
Journal:  J Magn Reson       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 2.229

4.  Automated NMR structure calculation with CYANA.

Authors:  Peter Güntert
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2004

Review 5.  Biomolecular simulation: a computational microscope for molecular biology.

Authors:  Ron O Dror; Robert M Dirks; J P Grossman; Huafeng Xu; David E Shaw
Journal:  Annu Rev Biophys       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 12.981

Review 6.  Macromolecular modeling with rosetta.

Authors:  Rhiju Das; David Baker
Journal:  Annu Rev Biochem       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 23.643

Review 7.  Determination of three-dimensional structures of proteins and nucleic acids in solution by nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy.

Authors:  G M Clore; A M Gronenborn
Journal:  Crit Rev Biochem Mol Biol       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 8.250

8.  Torsion angle dynamics for NMR structure calculation with the new program DYANA.

Authors:  P Güntert; C Mumenthaler; K Wüthrich
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1997-10-17       Impact factor: 5.469

9.  Regulation of T cell receptor activation by dynamic membrane binding of the CD3epsilon cytoplasmic tyrosine-based motif.

Authors:  Chenqi Xu; Etienne Gagnon; Matthew E Call; Jason R Schnell; Charles D Schwieters; Christopher V Carman; James J Chou; Kai W Wucherpfennig
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2008-11-14       Impact factor: 41.582

10.  NMR-based simulation studies of Pf1 coat protein in explicit membranes.

Authors:  Xi Cheng; Sunhwan Jo; Francesca M Marassi; Wonpil Im
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2013-08-06       Impact factor: 4.033

View more
  14 in total

1.  Xplor-NIH for molecular structure determination from NMR and other data sources.

Authors:  Charles D Schwieters; Guillermo A Bermejo; G Marius Clore
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2017-09-18       Impact factor: 6.725

Review 2.  Applications of NMR to membrane proteins.

Authors:  Stanley J Opella; Francesca M Marassi
Journal:  Arch Biochem Biophys       Date:  2017-05-18       Impact factor: 4.013

3.  The structure of a minimum amyloid fibril core formed by necroptosis-mediating RHIM of human RIPK3.

Authors:  Xialian Wu; Yeyang Ma; Kun Zhao; Jing Zhang; Yunpeng Sun; Yichen Li; Xingqi Dong; Hong Hu; Jing Liu; Jian Wang; Xia Zhang; Bing Li; Huayi Wang; Dan Li; Bo Sun; Junxia Lu; Cong Liu
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2021-04-06       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  A Cholesterol Dimer Stabilizes the Inactivated State of an Inward-Rectifier Potassium Channel.

Authors:  Collin G Borcik; Isaac R Eason; Maryam Yekefallah; Reza Amani; Ruixian Han; Boden H Vanderloop; Benjamin J Wylie
Journal:  Angew Chem Int Ed Engl       Date:  2022-02-09       Impact factor: 15.336

5.  Exploration of the Molecular Mechanism of Danzhi Xiaoyao Powder in Endometrial Cancer through Network Pharmacology.

Authors:  Lanyu Li; Lukai Yang; Fang Liu; Jinfeng Qu
Journal:  Evid Based Complement Alternat Med       Date:  2022-06-13       Impact factor: 2.650

6.  Structural Insights into the Yersinia pestis Outer Membrane Protein Ail in Lipid Bilayers.

Authors:  Samit Kumar Dutta; Yong Yao; Francesca M Marassi
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2017-08-04       Impact factor: 2.991

7.  Validation of protein backbone structures calculated from NMR angular restraints using Rosetta.

Authors:  Joel Lapin; Alexander A Nevzorov
Journal:  J Biomol NMR       Date:  2019-05-10       Impact factor: 2.582

8.  Solution structures of the Shewanella woodyi H-NOX protein in the presence and absence of soluble guanylyl cyclase stimulator IWP-051.

Authors:  Cheng-Yu Chen; Woonghee Lee; Paul A Renhowe; Joon Jung; William R Montfort
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2020-12-10       Impact factor: 6.993

9.  Integrated NMR and cryo-EM atomic-resolution structure determination of a half-megadalton enzyme complex.

Authors:  Diego F Gauto; Leandro F Estrozi; Charles D Schwieters; Gregory Effantin; Pavel Macek; Remy Sounier; Astrid C Sivertsen; Elena Schmidt; Rime Kerfah; Guillaume Mas; Jacques-Philippe Colletier; Peter Güntert; Adrien Favier; Guy Schoehn; Paul Schanda; Jerome Boisbouvier
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2019-06-19       Impact factor: 14.919

10.  Defining the mobility range of a hinge-type connection using molecular dynamics and metadynamics.

Authors:  Philip Horx; Armin Geyer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-04-13       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.