Literature DB >> 33261823

Increased staple loading pressures and reduced staple heights in laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy reduce intraoperative bleeding.

Eujin Yeo1, Jonathan Thompson2, Dennis Hanseman1, Adam Dunki-Jacobs3, Ben Thompson3, Michael Goodman1, Tayyab Diwan4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy, tissue thickness and closed staple height of the staple cartridge determine the pressure applied to the tissue. Prior studies have suggested 8 g/mm2 to be ideal to minimize leaks or bleeding.
METHODS: We evaluated the relationship between staple loading pressure applied to gastric tissue and bleeding rate prospectively with a novel tissue measuring device and video-recorded operative findings for 116 patients undergoing laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy performed by 2 surgeons at a single institution. Stapling protocol 1 was used for 64 cases, defined as standard practice, typically using green-blue-blue-blue Ethicon staple cartridges. Stapling protocol 2 was defined as blue-blue-white-white or gold-blue-white-white.
RESULTS: Tissue thickness measurements from 39 cases and staple load selection showed that surgeons preferred a median staple loading pressure of 15 g/mm2. Tissue thickness measurements at 15 g/mm2 had a mean of 1.86 mm at the antrum, 1.71 mm at the body, and 1.15 mm at the fundus, all significantly thinner than tissue thickness at 8 g/mm2. For each 10 g/mm2 increase in minimum pressure and maximum pressure value within each cartridge zone, there was a reduction in bleeding rate by 59.8% and 38.7%, respectively. Compared with stapling protocol 1, stapling protocol 2 had a lower intraoperative bleeding rate (90.2% vs 70.7%; P < .0001), usage of preventive hemostatic techniques (100% vs 10%; P < .0001), and hemostatic treatments (66% vs 46%; P = .04). In the 30-day postoperative period, there was 1 bleed in stapling protocol 1; there were no leaks.
CONCLUSION: Our data suggest using shorter closed staple heights to exert higher staple loading pressures decreases intraoperative bleeding rates in laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy.
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33261823      PMCID: PMC8107113          DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2020.10.045

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surgery        ISSN: 0039-6060            Impact factor:   3.982


  13 in total

1.  Influence of the distance between interrupted sutures and the tension of sutures on the healing of experimental colonic anastomoses.

Authors:  J Waninger; G W Kauffmann; I A Shah; E H Farthmann
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 2.565

2.  Updated position statement on sleeve gastrectomy as a bariatric procedure.

Authors: 
Journal:  Surg Obes Relat Dis       Date:  2012-02-10       Impact factor: 4.734

Review 3.  The science of stapling and leaks.

Authors:  Randal S Baker; James Foote; Paul Kemmeter; Randall Brady; Todd Vroegop; Matt Serveld
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2004 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 4.129

4.  Experimental study of double staple lines in gastric partitions.

Authors:  S J Eskind; J D Massie; M L Born; J P O'Leary; H W Scott
Journal:  Surg Gynecol Obstet       Date:  1981-06

5.  Human tissue thickness measurements from excised sleeve gastrectomy specimens.

Authors:  Logan Rawlins; Melissa P Rawlins; Donovan Teel
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-11-07       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Tissue thickness of human stomach measured on excised gastric specimens from obese patients.

Authors:  Hazem Elariny; Hamilton González; Bingshi Wang
Journal:  Surg Technol Int       Date:  2005

7.  A Thickness Calibration Device Is Needed to Determine Staple Height and Avoid Leaks in Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy.

Authors:  Rose Huang; Michel Gagner
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 4.129

8.  Evaluation of a Powered Stapler System with Gripping Surface Technology on Surgical Interventions Required During Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy.

Authors:  Elliott Fegelman; Susan Knippenberg; Michael Schwiers; Dimitrios Stefanidis; Keith S Gersin; John D Scott; Adolfo Z Fernandez
Journal:  J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A       Date:  2016-12-19       Impact factor: 1.878

Review 9.  Surgical stapling device-tissue interactions: what surgeons need to know to improve patient outcomes.

Authors:  Edward Chekan; Richard L Whelan
Journal:  Med Devices (Auckl)       Date:  2014-09-12

Review 10.  A Narrative of Intraoperative Staple Line Leaks and Bleeds During Bariatric Surgery.

Authors:  Sudip K Ghosh; Sanjoy Roy; Ed Chekan; Elliott J Fegelman
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 4.129

View more
  4 in total

1.  Battle of the buttress: 5-year propensity-matched analysis of staple-line reinforcement techniques from the MBSAQIP database.

Authors:  Mohamed A Aboueisha; Meredith Freeman; Jonathan K Allotey; Leah Evans; Michael Z Caposole; Danielle Tatum; Shauna Levy; John W Baker; Carlos Galvani
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2022-08-04       Impact factor: 3.453

2.  Improving Performance and Access to Difficult-to-Reach Anatomy with a Powered Articulating Stapler.

Authors:  Zhifan F Huang; James A Vandewalle; Jeffrey W Clymer; Crystal D Ricketts; William J Petraiuolo
Journal:  Med Devices (Auckl)       Date:  2022-09-02

3.  Surprising neutral effect of shorter staple cartridges in laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy.

Authors:  Christen E Salyer; Jonathan Thompson; Dennis Hanseman; Tayyab Diwan; Brad M Watkins; Joshua Kuethe; Michael D Goodman
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2021-11-12       Impact factor: 3.453

4.  Multisite study of Titan SGS stapler in longitudinal gastric resection.

Authors:  Christen E Salyer; Jonathan Thompson; Aaron Hoffman; Matthew D Burstein; Paul Enochs; Brad M Watkins; Joshua Kuethe; Michael D Goodman
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2022-01-26       Impact factor: 3.453

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.