Eujin Yeo1, Jonathan Thompson2, Dennis Hanseman1, Adam Dunki-Jacobs3, Ben Thompson3, Michael Goodman1, Tayyab Diwan4. 1. Department of Surgery, University of Cincinnati School of Medicine, OH. 2. Department of Surgery, University of Cincinnati School of Medicine, OH; Standard Bariatrics, Inc, Cincinnati, OH. 3. Standard Bariatrics, Inc, Cincinnati, OH. 4. Department of Surgery, University of Cincinnati School of Medicine, OH; Mayo Clinic Rochester, MN. Electronic address: diwan.tayyab@mayo.edu.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: In laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy, tissue thickness and closed staple height of the staple cartridge determine the pressure applied to the tissue. Prior studies have suggested 8 g/mm2 to be ideal to minimize leaks or bleeding. METHODS: We evaluated the relationship between staple loading pressure applied to gastric tissue and bleeding rate prospectively with a novel tissue measuring device and video-recorded operative findings for 116 patients undergoing laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy performed by 2 surgeons at a single institution. Stapling protocol 1 was used for 64 cases, defined as standard practice, typically using green-blue-blue-blue Ethicon staple cartridges. Stapling protocol 2 was defined as blue-blue-white-white or gold-blue-white-white. RESULTS: Tissue thickness measurements from 39 cases and staple load selection showed that surgeons preferred a median staple loading pressure of 15 g/mm2. Tissue thickness measurements at 15 g/mm2 had a mean of 1.86 mm at the antrum, 1.71 mm at the body, and 1.15 mm at the fundus, all significantly thinner than tissue thickness at 8 g/mm2. For each 10 g/mm2 increase in minimum pressure and maximum pressure value within each cartridge zone, there was a reduction in bleeding rate by 59.8% and 38.7%, respectively. Compared with stapling protocol 1, stapling protocol 2 had a lower intraoperative bleeding rate (90.2% vs 70.7%; P < .0001), usage of preventive hemostatic techniques (100% vs 10%; P < .0001), and hemostatic treatments (66% vs 46%; P = .04). In the 30-day postoperative period, there was 1 bleed in stapling protocol 1; there were no leaks. CONCLUSION: Our data suggest using shorter closed staple heights to exert higher staple loading pressures decreases intraoperative bleeding rates in laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy.
BACKGROUND: In laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy, tissue thickness and closed staple height of the staple cartridge determine the pressure applied to the tissue. Prior studies have suggested 8 g/mm2 to be ideal to minimize leaks or bleeding. METHODS: We evaluated the relationship between staple loading pressure applied to gastric tissue and bleeding rate prospectively with a novel tissue measuring device and video-recorded operative findings for 116 patients undergoing laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy performed by 2 surgeons at a single institution. Stapling protocol 1 was used for 64 cases, defined as standard practice, typically using green-blue-blue-blue Ethicon staple cartridges. Stapling protocol 2 was defined as blue-blue-white-white or gold-blue-white-white. RESULTS: Tissue thickness measurements from 39 cases and staple load selection showed that surgeons preferred a median staple loading pressure of 15 g/mm2. Tissue thickness measurements at 15 g/mm2 had a mean of 1.86 mm at the antrum, 1.71 mm at the body, and 1.15 mm at the fundus, all significantly thinner than tissue thickness at 8 g/mm2. For each 10 g/mm2 increase in minimum pressure and maximum pressure value within each cartridge zone, there was a reduction in bleeding rate by 59.8% and 38.7%, respectively. Compared with stapling protocol 1, stapling protocol 2 had a lower intraoperative bleeding rate (90.2% vs 70.7%; P < .0001), usage of preventive hemostatic techniques (100% vs 10%; P < .0001), and hemostatic treatments (66% vs 46%; P = .04). In the 30-day postoperative period, there was 1 bleed in stapling protocol 1; there were no leaks. CONCLUSION: Our data suggest using shorter closed staple heights to exert higher staple loading pressures decreases intraoperative bleeding rates in laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy.
Authors: Elliott Fegelman; Susan Knippenberg; Michael Schwiers; Dimitrios Stefanidis; Keith S Gersin; John D Scott; Adolfo Z Fernandez Journal: J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A Date: 2016-12-19 Impact factor: 1.878
Authors: Mohamed A Aboueisha; Meredith Freeman; Jonathan K Allotey; Leah Evans; Michael Z Caposole; Danielle Tatum; Shauna Levy; John W Baker; Carlos Galvani Journal: Surg Endosc Date: 2022-08-04 Impact factor: 3.453
Authors: Christen E Salyer; Jonathan Thompson; Dennis Hanseman; Tayyab Diwan; Brad M Watkins; Joshua Kuethe; Michael D Goodman Journal: Surg Endosc Date: 2021-11-12 Impact factor: 3.453
Authors: Christen E Salyer; Jonathan Thompson; Aaron Hoffman; Matthew D Burstein; Paul Enochs; Brad M Watkins; Joshua Kuethe; Michael D Goodman Journal: Surg Endosc Date: 2022-01-26 Impact factor: 3.453