Literature DB >> 15958002

The relationship of vaginal prolapse severity to symptoms and quality of life.

G Alessandro Digesu1, Charlotte Chaliha, Stefano Salvatore, Anna Hutchings, Vik Khullar.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess the relationship and location of vaginal prolapse severity to symptoms and quality of life.
DESIGN: A prospective observational study.
SETTING: Urogynaecology Unit, Imperial College, St Mary's Hospital, London. POPULATION: Women with and without symptoms of vaginal prolapse.
METHODS: All women completed a validated Prolapse Quality of Life (P-QOL) questionnaire. This included a urinary, bowel and sexual symptom questionnaire. All women were examined using the Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification system (POP-Q). POP-Q scores in those with and without prolapse symptoms were compared. Urinary and bowel symptoms and sexual function were compared and related to prolapse severity and location. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: POP-Q scores, P-QOL scores, urinary and bowel symptoms and sexual function.
RESULTS: Three hundred and fifty-five women were recruited-233 symptomatic and 122 asymptomatic of prolapse. The median P-QOL domain scores ranged between 42-100 in symptomatic women and 0-25 in those who were asymptomatic. The stage of prolapse was significantly higher in those symptomatic of prolapse (P < 0.001) except for perineal body (PB) measurement. Urinary symptoms were not correlated with uterovaginal prolapse severity whereas bowel symptoms were strongly associated with posterior vaginal wall prolapse. Cervical descent was found to have a relationship with sexual dysfunction symptoms.
CONCLUSIONS: Women who present with symptoms specific to pelvic organ prolapse demonstrate greater degrees of pelvic relaxation than women who present without symptoms. Prolapse severity and quality of life scores are significantly different in those women symptomatic of prolapse. There was a stronger relationship between posterior prolapse and bowel symptoms than anterior prolapse and urinary symptoms. Sexual dysfunction was related to cervical descent.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15958002     DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2005.00568.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BJOG        ISSN: 1470-0328            Impact factor:   6.531


  70 in total

1.  Clinical impact of bowel symptoms in women with pelvic floor disorders.

Authors:  José Ananias Vasconcelos Neto; Camila Teixeira Moreira Vasconcelos; Sthela Maria Murad Regadas; Leonardo Robson Pinheiro Sobreira Bezerra; Kathiane Augusto Lustosa; Sara Arcanjo Lino Karbage
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2017-03-06       Impact factor: 2.894

2.  Prospective evaluation of outcome of vaginal pessaries versus surgery in women with symptomatic pelvic organ prolapse.

Authors:  Zeelha Abdool; Ranee Thakar; Abdul H Sultan; Reeba S Oliver
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2010-12-16       Impact factor: 2.894

Review 3.  Repair of pelvic organ prolapse: what is the goal?

Authors:  Margarita M Aponte; Nirit Rosenblum
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 3.092

Review 4.  Management of Overactive Bladder in the Face of High Grade Prolapse.

Authors:  Juan Guzman-Negron; Sandip Vasavada
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 3.092

5.  Symptomatic and quality of life outcomes after site-specific fascial reattachment for pelvic organ prolapse repair.

Authors:  Abdalla M Fayyad; Emma Redhead; Noveen Awan; Maria Kyrgiou; Sanjeev Prashar; Simon R Hill
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  2007-09-15

6.  Evaluation of COLIA1-1997 G/T polymorphism as a related factor to genital prolapse.

Authors:  Claudia Cristina Palos; Beatriz Ferreira Timm; Denise de Souza Paulo; Cesar Eduardo Fernandes; Ricardo Peres de Souto; Emerson Oliveira
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2018-11-27       Impact factor: 2.894

7.  The effect of pelvic organ prolapse severity on improvement in overactive bladder symptoms after pelvic reconstructive surgery.

Authors:  Jeannine M Miranne; Vrishali Lopes; Cassandra L Carberry; Vivian W Sung
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2012-12-11       Impact factor: 2.894

8.  Validation of the Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I) for urogenital prolapse.

Authors:  Sushma Srikrishna; Dudley Robinson; Linda Cardozo
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2009-12-15       Impact factor: 2.894

9.  Validity, reliability and responsiveness of a Dutch version of the prolapse quality-of-life (P-QoL) questionnaire.

Authors:  Filip Claerhout; Philip Moons; Sophie Ghesquiere; Jasper Verguts; Dirk De Ridder; Jan Deprest
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2010-01-16       Impact factor: 2.894

10.  The impact of personality traits on pessary treatment outcomes in patients with pelvic organ prolapse.

Authors:  Congcong Ma; Jia Kang; Tao Xu; Ye Zhang; Yidi Ma; Lan Zhu
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2020-11-18       Impact factor: 2.894

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.