Literature DB >> 2803418

The legal context for evaluating and dismissing medical students and residents.

D M Irby1, S Milam.   

Abstract

Medical school faculty often cite the fear of litigation as a reason for their reluctance to offer candid evaluations of students' and residents' performances and to dismiss them when necessary. This article is written to reassure faculty that they have nothing to fear from the courts and that they should uphold high academic standards. Three legal issues of concern to faculty are addressed: What does fair and equitable treatment entail? What are the due process requirements for academic dismissals? Are negative performance evaluations libelous and defamatory? Recommendations are made to meet legal requirements and to promote academic excellence.

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2803418     DOI: 10.1097/00001888-198911000-00001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acad Med        ISSN: 1040-2446            Impact factor:   6.893


  12 in total

1.  Ethical and professional conduct of medical students: review of current assessment measures and controversies.

Authors:  K Boon; J Turner
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 2.903

2.  Resident evaluation and remediation: a comprehensive approach.

Authors:  Jim S Wu; Bettina Siewert; Phillip M Boiselle
Journal:  J Grad Med Educ       Date:  2010-06

3.  The hidden costs of failing to fail residents.

Authors:  Nicole K Roberts; Reed G Williams
Journal:  J Grad Med Educ       Date:  2011-06

4.  Problems with using a supervisor's report as a form of summative assessment.

Authors:  Tim J Wilkinson; Winnie B Wade
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 2.401

5.  Legal Considerations in the Remediation and Dismissal of Graduate Medical Trainees.

Authors:  Cedric Lefebvre; Kelly Williamson; Peter Moffett; Angela Cummings; Beth Gianopulos; Elizabeth Winters; Mitchell Sokolosky
Journal:  J Grad Med Educ       Date:  2018-06

6.  Litigation in residency training programs and suggested due process guidelines for "residents in trouble".

Authors:  M Brown; P V Shah; A Brody; S M Woods; J Yager
Journal:  Acad Psychiatry       Date:  1994-09

7.  Interrater reliability in evaluating trainee interviewing skills.

Authors:  B Templeton; M M Allen
Journal:  Acad Psychiatry       Date:  1990-12

8.  The Administrative Psychiatric Evaluation.

Authors:  Nicholas D Lawson; Adina L Kalet
Journal:  J Grad Med Educ       Date:  2016-02

9.  Justice and care: decision making by medical school student promotions committees.

Authors:  Emily P Green; Philip A Gruppuso
Journal:  Med Educ       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 6.251

10.  Clinical work sampling A new approach to the problem of in-training evaluation.

Authors:  J Turnbull; J MacFadyen; C Van Barneveld; G Norman
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 5.128

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.