Literature DB >> 15082823

Ethical and professional conduct of medical students: review of current assessment measures and controversies.

K Boon1, J Turner.   

Abstract

As medical education increasingly acknowledges the importance of the ethical and professional conduct of practitioners, and moves towards more formal assessment of these issues, it is important to consider the evidence base which exists in this area. This article discusses literature about the health needs and problems experienced by medical practitioners as a background to a review of the current efforts in medical education to promote ethical conduct and develop mechanisms for the detection and remediation of problems.

Keywords:  Bioethics and Professional Ethics; Empirical Approach

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15082823      PMCID: PMC1733830          DOI: 10.1136/jme.2002.002618

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Ethics        ISSN: 0306-6800            Impact factor:   2.903


  29 in total

1.  A strategy for the detection and evaluation of unprofessional behavior in medical students. University of California, San Francisco School of Medicine Clinical Clerkships Operation Committee.

Authors:  M A Papadakis; E H Osborn; M Cooke; K Healy
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 6.893

2.  Medical students, drugs and alcohol: time for medical schools to take the issue seriously.

Authors:  P Wallace
Journal:  Med Educ       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 6.251

3.  The impact of three years' ethics teaching, in an integrated medical curriculum, on students' proposed behaviour on meeting ethical dilemmas.

Authors:  John Goldie; Lisa Schwartz; Alex McConnachie; Jillian Morrison
Journal:  Med Educ       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 6.251

4.  Professional development in undergraduate medical curricula--the key to the door of a new culture?

Authors:  Amanda Howe
Journal:  Med Educ       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 6.251

5.  Patients' global ratings of student competence. Unreliable contamination or gold standard?

Authors:  Tim J Wilkinson; Sylvie Fontaine
Journal:  Med Educ       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 6.251

6.  Noncognitive criteria for assessing students in North American medical schools.

Authors:  G D Miller; D Frank; R D Franks; C J Getto
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  1989-01       Impact factor: 6.893

Review 7.  Identifying and assisting the impaired physician.

Authors:  E V Boisaubin; R E Levine
Journal:  Am J Med Sci       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 2.378

8.  Validity and importance of low ratings given medical graduates in noncognitive areas.

Authors:  M W Herman; J J Veloski; M Hojat
Journal:  J Med Educ       Date:  1983-11

9.  The role of compulsiveness in the normal physician.

Authors:  G O Gabbard
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1985 Nov 22-29       Impact factor: 56.272

10.  Legal guidelines for evaluating and dismissing medical students.

Authors:  D M Irby; J I Fantel; S D Milam; M R Schwarz
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1981-01-15       Impact factor: 91.245

View more
  7 in total

1.  Competing duties: medical educators, underperforming students, and social accountability.

Authors:  Thalia Arawi; Philip M Rosoff
Journal:  J Bioeth Inq       Date:  2012-03-13       Impact factor: 1.352

2.  Ways to Make Medical Students Competent Professionally: View of Medical Students.

Authors:  Manoj Khadka; Bibash Kunwar
Journal:  JNMA J Nepal Med Assoc       Date:  2021-12-11       Impact factor: 0.556

3.  Differences in Faculty and Standardized Patient Scores on Professionalism for Second-Year Podiatric Medical Students During a Standardized Simulated Patient Encounter.

Authors:  James M Mahoney; Vassilios Vardaxis; Noreen Anwar; Jacob Hagenbucher
Journal:  J Am Podiatr Med Assoc       Date:  2018-03

4.  Evaluation of moral competency using standardized patient: presenting an experience.

Authors:  Fariba Asghari; Bagher Larijani
Journal:  J Med Ethics Hist Med       Date:  2010-10-30

5.  Structured and unstructured viva voce assessment: A double-blind, randomized, comparative evaluation of medical students.

Authors:  Mohammed Imran; Chintan Doshi; Darshan Kharadi
Journal:  Int J Health Sci (Qassim)       Date:  2019 Mar-Apr

6.  Challenges in the ethics review process of clinical scientific research projects in China.

Authors:  Zhu-Heng Wang; Guan-Hua Zhou; Li-Ping Sun; Jun Gang
Journal:  J Int Med Res       Date:  2019-09-20       Impact factor: 1.671

7.  How to develop an undergraduate medical professionalism curriculum: Experts' perception and suggestion.

Authors:  Soolmaz Zare; Nikoo Yamani; Tahereh Changiz
Journal:  J Adv Med Educ Prof       Date:  2019-10
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.