Literature DB >> 28032241

Improvement of speech perception in quiet and in noise without decreasing localization abilities with the bone conduction device Bonebridge.

Roxanne Weiss1, Martin Leinung2, Uwe Baumann2, Tobias Weißgerber2, Tobias Rader2,3,4, Timo Stöver2.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to examine the functional hearing results regarding speech perception and auditory sound localization in a high-resolution directional hearing setup following implantation with a new bone conduction device (MED-EL Bonebridge, Innsbruck, Austria). In addition, we assessed the patient acceptance of the Bonebridge system using a questionnaire. The study design is retrospective study. The setting is University Hospital Frankfurt. 18 patients implanted with a Bonebridge device from May 2012 to January 2015 were participated in this study. Speech perception in quiet was tested with the Freiburg monosyllable test at a presentation level of 65 dB SPL. Speech perception in noise was tested post-operatively with the Oldenburg sentence test (OLSA) in best-aided condition. We assessed auditory sound localization with a high-resolution directional hearing setup. To evaluate the acceptance by patients using the Bonebridge in daily life, we used a modified questionnaire. The overall average of functional hearing gain (n = 18) was 29.3 dB (±20.7 dB). Speech perception of monosyllabic words in quiet improved by 20.7% on average, compared with the pre-operative aided condition. Mean speech reception thresholds (SRTs) of the Oldenburg sentence test (OLSA) improved significantly from -3.8 dB SNR (range -5.7 to 5.8 dB SNR) to -5.2 dB SNR (range -6.3 to -0.6 dB SNR) after implantation. Regarding localization abilities, no significant difference was found between the unaided and aided conditions following Bonebridge implantation. A survey of patients' acceptance and handling of the Bonebridge implant in daily life revealed high patient satisfaction. All patients accepted and benefited from the implanted system. No infections or adverse surgical effects occurred. Speech perception significantly improved in quiet and in noise. No significant difference in sound localization was observed. Acceptance of the Bonebridge implant, tested with a modified questionnaire, was high.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bone conduction; Bone conduction implant; Bonebridge; Cholesteatoma; Conductive hearing loss; Middle ear surgery; Transcutaneous implant

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 28032241     DOI: 10.1007/s00405-016-4434-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol        ISSN: 0937-4477            Impact factor:   2.503


  15 in total

1.  [Speech audiometry and new word-tests].

Authors:  K H HAHLBROCK
Journal:  Arch Ohren Nasen Kehlkopfheilkd       Date:  1953

2.  Bone-anchored hearing aids in unilateral inner ear deafness: an evaluation of audiometric and patient outcome measurements.

Authors:  Myrthe K S Hol; Arjan J Bosman; Ad F M Snik; Emmanuel A M Mylanus; Cor W R J Cremers
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 2.311

3.  An experimental objective method to determine maximum output and dynamic range of an active bone conduction implant: the Bonebridge.

Authors:  Griet Mertens; Jolien Desmet; Ad F M Snik; Paul Van de Heyning
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 2.311

4.  Indication criteria and outcomes with the Bonebridge transcutaneous bone-conduction implant.

Authors:  Dominik Riss; Christoph Arnoldner; Wolf-Dieter Baumgartner; Michaela Blineder; Stefan Flak; Anna Bachner; Wolfgang Gstoettner; Jafar-Sasan Hamzavi
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2014-08-20       Impact factor: 3.325

5.  A new bone conduction implant: surgical technique and results.

Authors:  Manuel Manrique; Ignacio Sanhueza; Raquel Manrique; Jorge de Abajo
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 2.311

6.  Functional results after Bonebridge implantation in adults and children with conductive and mixed hearing loss.

Authors:  Torsten Rahne; Ingmar Seiwerth; Gerrit Götze; Cornelia Heider; Florian Radetzki; Michael Herzog; Stefan K Plontke
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2014-11-26       Impact factor: 2.503

7.  Localization by unilateral BAHA users.

Authors:  Jack J Wazen; Soha N Ghossaini; Jaclyn B Spitzer; Mary Kuller
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 3.497

8.  Outcome of bone-anchored hearing aids for single-sided deafness: a prospective study.

Authors:  Irumee Pai; Catherine Kelleher; Terry Nunn; Nidhi Pathak; Mudit Jindal; Alec Fitzgerald O'Connor; Dan Jiang
Journal:  Acta Otolaryngol       Date:  2012-04-12       Impact factor: 1.494

9.  A meta-analysis of the complications associated with osseointegrated hearing aids.

Authors:  Ruwan Kiringoda; Lawrence R Lustig
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 2.311

10.  The Bonebridge: preclinical evaluation of a new transcutaneously-activated bone anchored hearing device.

Authors:  A M Huber; J H Sim; Y Z Xie; M Chatzimichalis; O Ullrich; C Röösli
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2013-03-01       Impact factor: 3.208

View more
  15 in total

1.  [A sound reproduction system using wave field synthesis to simulate everyday listening conditions].

Authors:  T Weißgerber
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 1.284

Review 2.  [Active hearing implants in chronic otitis media].

Authors:  S Lailach; C Müller; N Lasurashvili; H Seidler; T Zahnert
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2021-06       Impact factor: 1.284

3.  The bone conduction implant BONEBRIDGE increases quality of life and social life satisfaction.

Authors:  C Irmer; S Volkenstein; S Dazert; A Neumann
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2022-05-06       Impact factor: 2.503

4.  Long-term audiological benefit with an active transcutaneous bone-conduction device: a retrospective cohort analysis.

Authors:  Julia Hundertpfund; Jens Eduard Meyer; Attila Ovari
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2021-08-23       Impact factor: 2.503

5.  Bonebridge® bone conduction implant. Hearing outcomes and quality of life in patients with conductive/mixed hearing loss.

Authors:  Claudio Carnevale; C Morales-Olavarría; G Til-Pérez; P Sarría-Echegaray
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2022-09-05       Impact factor: 3.236

6.  A Bone Conduction Implantable Device as a Functional Treatment Option in Unilateral Microtia with Bilateral Stapes Ankylosis: A Report of Two Cases.

Authors:  Diego Zanetti; Federica Di Berardino
Journal:  Am J Case Rep       Date:  2018-01-23

7.  Evaluation of a Novel Wellness Assessment Device (Preventiometer): A Feasibility Pilot Study.

Authors:  Sanjeev Nanda; Saswati Mahapatra; Stephanie A Lindeen; Joleen L Bernau; Susanne M Cutshall; Bernd Schierwater; Tony Y Chon; Dietlind L Wahner-Roedler; Brent A Bauer
Journal:  Glob Adv Health Med       Date:  2019-10-09

8.  Patient-reported long-term benefit with an active transcutaneous bone-conduction device.

Authors:  Julia Hundertpfund; Jens Eduard Meyer; Attila Óvári
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-11-02       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Active transcutaneous bone conduction hearing implants: Systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Astrid Magele; Philipp Schoerg; Barbara Stanek; Bernhard Gradl; Georg Mathias Sprinzl
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-09-16       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Clinical and functional results after implantation of the bonebridge, a semi-implantable, active transcutaneous bone conduction device, in children and adults.

Authors:  Ingmar Seiwerth; Laura Fröhlich; Sebastian Schilde; Gerrit Götze; Stefan K Plontke; Torsten Rahne
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2021-03-06       Impact factor: 2.503

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.