Surgery combined with brachytherapy in patients with retroperitoneal sarcomas.

PURPOSE: The primary aim of this work was to analyze feasibility of combined treatment of retroperitoneal sarcomas (RS): surgery (S) and intraoperative brachytherapy (IOBRT). The secondary aim was to analyze results and complications after this treatment.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: 84 patients with retroperitoneal sarcomas were qualified for combined treatment (S and IOBRT) between June 1998 and September 2006. 65 of the patients (77.4%) had local recurrences. Sarcomas with intermediate and high grade of histological malignancy (G2, G3 - 76.2%) were the most frequent within the all surgically treated patients. Resection ability (R0/R1) in analyzed group of patients was estimated as 85% (74 cases). After intraoperative evaluation, 57 (67.8%) patients were qualified for IOBRT. Since 2000, in 34 patients (60%) an adjuvant postoperative external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) in dose of 50 Gy was applied. Median follow-up of the surviving patients was 40 months.
RESULTS: On the basis of the univariate analysis, relevant aspects negatively influencing overall survival rate within the RS group treated with IOBRT were as follows: surgery of sarcoma recurrence (p = 0.002), higher grade of histological malignancy (p = 0.05), histological type different than liposarcoma (p = 0.05) as well as no adjuvant EBRT (p = 0.05). On the basis of multivariate analysis one can ascertain that relevant factors negatively influencing LRFS in RS patients treated with IOBRT were: surgery due to recurrence of sarcoma (p = 0.008) and lack of EBRT (p = 0.01).
CONCLUSIONS: Combined treatment (surgery and brachytherapy) was possible to be carried out on 68% of RS patients. The overall number of complications was quite high, however acceptable, taking into consideration the application of extensive, multi-organ treatments in case of sarcoma recurrences in this localization. The results suggest that the method of treatment will improve the final outcome when most of patients will be qualified for treatment of primary sarcomas in experienced centre.

Purpose

Soft tissue sarcomas belong to a rare type of malignant tumors deriving from connective tissue and orginating mainly from mesodermal germ layer. Retroperitoneal sarcoma (RS) constitute for approximately 0,4% of all malignant tumors, which is about 15% of all sarcoma localizations [1]. The retroperitoneal space is very difficult for physical evaluation, mainly because the RS develops asymptomatically thus attaining large size and is often detected accidentally during an examination of different matter. Surgery is the sole treatment modality that may lead to total cure of this type of tumor. Obtaining microscopic tumor-free radical margin restricts complicated anatomic issues, lack of anatomic compartments, asymptomatic growth of the tumor and its large size, frequent infiltration and proximity of the vital organs. To reach the appropriate surgery margin without removal of the sarcoma in one piece with an adjacent organ is usually impossible.

Furthermore, during treatment of local recurrences the radical approach is possible in 60-70% of all cases with first or consecutive tumor recurrence [2-5]. The resection of adjacent organs is generally well-founded because of its technical rationale in radical surgery, rather than actual infiltration of the organ. Jacques et al. had shown the actual infiltration of kidney parenchyma in 2 out of 30 nephrectomies [6]. The NCI analysis conducted in 1975 demonstrated that patients with retroperitoneal sarcoma tend to experience local recurrences with intraperitoneal dissemination [7] rather than create metastases beyond abdomen cavity. The time of local recurrence is similar in all conducted analyses: Cantin et al. [8] presented in their publication that 80% of local recurrences occurred within 2 years, Simon and Ennecking [9] – 100% of local recurrences within 30 months, Lindberg et al. [10] – 80% of local recurrences within 2 years and 100% of local recurrences in 3 years, whereas Shiu et al. [11] observed 87% of local recurrences within 2 years.

Adjuvant radiotherapy is a standard procedure for extremities and integument sarcomas patients treated with radical surgery. In patients with extremities sarcoma the dose of the whole postoperative radiation field exceeds 60 Gy (60-80 Gy) [12]. Tepper et al. [13] showed excellent improvement of the local control in case of applying a dose level more than 60 Gy as compared to the dose below 50 Gy. Fein et al. [14] presented data that after application of a dose > 55 Gy the local control rate was 72%, while after dose < 55 Gy the local control was 38%. Comparable results were achieved by Catton et al. [15]. Applications of such doses are usually impossible in case of retroperitoneal sarcomas due to possible complications and difficult anatomic relations. In localization of retroperitoneal sarcomas a lot of critical organs are found: intestines, kidneys, liver and spinal cord. EBRT in high doses considerably increases serious complications, so the dose in retroperitoneal space rarely exceeds 45-50 Gy which is recognized as a well tolerated dose [16, 17]. However, this dose is too low for adjuvant treatment of soft tissue sarcomas. This explains the importance of combined treatment (surgery/radiotherapy) in order to achieve good local control. Based on the results and taking into consideration difficulties in achieving the accurate surgery margins and high percentage of local recurrences in retroperitoneal sarcomas, determine the use of adjuvant radiotherapy in the case of retroperitoneal sarcomas also. The idea of interstitial irradiation is to deliver a High Dose Rate dose (HDR) directly into tumor tissues or to the site of removed tumor which increases of the therapeutic index without the necessity of exposing the organ at risk due to EBRT complications. In treatment of retroperitoneal sarcomas, the range of radiation doses used in different centers of the world is quite large and differ from 8,75 to 30 Gy, however doses used in most of the centers vary from 10 to 20 Gy [17-23]. The data relates to cases with previous application of EBRT or planned postoperative adjuvant radiotherapy.

The aim of this work was to evaluate the effectiveness of combined treatment (surgery + IOBRT/EBRT), complications of this type of treatment, results of overall survival rate and local recurrence rate in retroperitoneal sarcoma patients.

Material and methods

Material

In 1998 Department of Soft Tissue/Bone Sarcoma (DSTBS), Cancer Center and Institute of Oncology started a prospective study about the estimation of possibilities and results for intraoperative brachytherapy (IOBRT) after radical surgery of retroperitoneal sarcoma. In 2000 the Centre started a treatment with the use of additional adjuvant EBRT for patients treated with combined treatment (surgery/intraoperative brachytherapy). The treatment protocol of the study was accepted by Bioethics Committee of M. Sklodowska-Curie Cancer Center and Institute of Oncology in Warsaw. Before entering the trial, every patient was obliged to give his written consent for participation in the study. From June 1998 to September 2006, 84 retroperitoneal sarcoma patients were qualified for combined treatment (surgery + IOBRT). Retroperitoneal sarcoma was confirmed in all 84 patients by obtaining histopathology results, CT scan, X-ray, abdomen cavity and pelvis MRI. Surgery was performed in 49 women and 35 men. The age ranged from 17-78 (median 50): 17-75 for women (median 51), 22-78 for man (median 49). In the whole group of patients only 19 (22.6%) of cases with retroperitoneal sarcoma were previously diagnosed and primarily treated at the Institute of Oncology. The remaining 77.4% experienced recurrences of retroperitoneal sarcoma and were operated (sometimes even several times) in other Centers and eventually guided to DSTBS. The largest diameter of most treated tumors (94.1%) exceeded 5 cm (range 4-23 cm; median tumor size 15 cm) (Fig. 1). In this group the majority of sarcomas were with intermediate and high histological malignance grade (G2, G3 – 76.2%), the most common type of sarcomas were liposarcoma – 46 cases (54.8%) and leiomyosarcoma – 11 patients (13.1%). After radical surgery, 57 patients (67.8%) had undergone BRT.

Fig. 1

CT scan of retroperitoneal sarcoma prepared for EBRT planning and extent of surgery (tumor and left kidney, tumor outlined in red line)

Brachytherapy

HDR units: Gammamed 12i® and MicroSelectron® were used for intraoperative irradiation. Iridium –192 was used with nominal activity 10 Ci, applied through HAM (Harrison Anderson Mick) flap applicator. The treatment planning was done with the use of ABACUS 3.0 treatment planning system (earlier, version 1.6 was used instead) on a 3D platform. The range of therapeutic beam penetration was set on the basis of intraoperative radiologic test that did not exceed 1 cm from the applicator surface. The single dose of 20 Gy was delivered to the treatment volume with 1 cm margins (Figs. 2 and 3). In case of insufficient hemodynamic parameters such as high amount of blood loss, irradiation was not applied in the day of surgery. The abdominal cavity was closed, but packing (cotton cloth) was placed on location were organ removal occurred and triggered ambiguous homeostasis. Eventual packing removal was done after 1-3 days. Since 2000, the additional postoperative EBRT radiation after IOBRT was applied meanly after 30 days from combined retroperitoneal sarcomas/IOBRT surgery. EBRT planned dose of site and postoperative scar was 50 Gy in 1.8 Gy fractions.

Fig. 2

Brachytherapy planning – dose distribution for a frontal plane

Fig. 3

Intraoperative brachytherapy planning. A) 3D image of HAM applicator position, B) Dose distribution and HAM applicators location

The clinical and pathological parameters examined for prognostic value within the group undergoing IOBRT were tumor size (divided into two groups: < 10 and > 10 cm), histological malignancy grade of tumor (low grade G1 vs. high grade G2 or G3), histological tumor type (liposarcoma vs. others), sex, one-time resection with a contiguous organ (zero additional organs, one organ, and more than one organ), number of previous operations (zero, one, or more than one), and subsequent EBRT. We did not include the microscopic status of resection margins R0 vs. R1 in this analysis, because the probability of reliable estimation found mostly in recurrent retroperitoneal sarcomas is doubtful.

Follow-up

Postoperative follow-up consisted of physical examination and routine imaging investigations such as computed tomography and ultrasonography of the abdominal cavity as well as chest X-ray/X-rays. Observations were assessed and analyzed every 3 months for the first 2 years, then in the 3rd to 5th year period – every 6 months, and annually thereafter. The median follow-up time was 40 months for survivors (range: 8-100 months) and for IOBRT patients – 39 months (range: 8-82 months).

Statistical analysis

Overall survival (OS) time was calculated from the date of operation at the study institution to the date of the most recent follow- up or death. The local recurrence free survival (LRFS) time was estimated from the date of retroperitoneal sarcoma excision to the date of the most recent follow up or local retroperitoneal sarcomas recurrence. For prospective data collection, the hospital system Oncosys was applied. Statistical analysis was performed using Statistica® software (StatSoft, Tulsa, OK). In univariate analysis survival rate was assessed using the Kaplan-Meier method in combination with the log-rank test. Multivariate analysis for overall survival was performed with the use of proportional hazard Cox regression model. Differences were considered statistically significant if p values were < 0.05.

Results

74 (85%) patients qualified for retroperitoneal surgery of sarcoma underwent radically macroscopic surgery. The estimated 5-year OS for the entire group of retroperitoneal sarcomas patients after radical macroscopic resection was 41% (median survival time: 48 months), and the evaluated 5-years LRFS was 61%. In the total group of patients with retroperitoneal sarcoma it was necessary to remove another organ along with the tumor in 79% of patients (60/74 cases with R0/R1 resection) - one organ in 20 patients and more than 1 organs in 40 patients. Within the IOBRT group, there was a total of 75% of patients (43 cases) were removal was performed – one organ in 11 patients (19.2% ) and more then 1 organ in 32 patients (56.1%). The most often removed organ was as follows: kidney (39 cases), large intestine (28 cases), small intestine (10 cases), ovary (8 cases), spleen (7 cases) and iliopsoas (6 cases).

57 patients (67.8%) were ultimately qualified for BRT, out of which 48 patients (84%) underwent one-time BRT at the time of surgery, directly after removal of retroperitoneal sarcoma, whereas 9 patients (16%) underwent IOBRT in 1-3 days after retroperitoneal sarcoma removal due to poor parameters at the time of surgery. For reasons of high amount of blood loss and/or hemodynamical disorders, the patients were not able to receive one-time BRT on the day of surgery.

The remaining group of 27 patients (32.2%) was disqualified from IOBRT. This group consisted of 20 women and 7 man. Within this group only 4 patients (14.8%) had primary sarcomas that were diagnosed at the DSTBS, while the remaining 85.2% cases were qualified for treatment as recurrences after previously completed surgery and EBRT outside our Clinic.

The reasons for IOBRT disqualification were as follows:

multifocal changes undetected during preoperative imagining evaluations: 11 patients,

non-radical resection: 5 patients,

tumor localized on large vessels: 4 patients,

circulatory failure and high amount of blood loss during surgery: 3 patients,

liver metastases confirmed intraoperatively 2 patients,

irradiation before CO-I: 2 patients.

Analysis of IOBRT group of patients

57 patients received IOBRT. The data of IOBRT patients are presented in Table 1. The final resection margins were evaluated as radically microscopic (R0) in 37 cases (65%), while tumor infiltration in microscopic investigation of resection margins (R1) was confirmed in 20 cases (35%).

Table 1

Clinical characteristics of 57 retroperitoneal sarcoma patients treated with intraoperative brachytherapy

Clinical data	Number of patients, rate (%)
Sex:
Female	31 (54.4%)
Male	26 (45.6%)
Age [years] (range; median):	17-78; 50
Female	17-75; 49
Male	22-78; 50
Greatest size of sarcoma:
≤ 10 cm	22 (26%)
> 10 cm	62 (74%)
Malignancy grade (G)
G1	19 (33.3%)
G2	14 (24.6%)
G3	24 (42.1%)
Histopathology:
liposarcoma	35 (61.4%)
leiomysarcoma	5 (8.8%)
malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor	5 (8.8%)
others	12 (21.0%)
Surgery:
Primary tumour	15 (26.3%)
Recurrence	42 (73.7%)
Previous surgery:
0	15 (36.3%)
1	36 (63.2%)
>1	6 (10.5%)
Number of resected organs during RS surgery:
0	14 (24.5%)
1	11 (19.3%)
>1	32 (56.2%)
Intraoperative brachytherapy:
simultaneous	48 (84.21%)
delayed	9 (15.8%)
External Beam Radiation Therapy (after surgery)	34 (60%)

Different number of applicators was used because of the diameter of the field (ranged from 4 to 19). The total irradiation time ranged from 20 to 87 minutes with mean value of 56 min. In two patients it was necessary to install two HAM applicators due to large radiation fields requiring two applicators with 10 adapters (6 and 9 adaptors were used) in asymmetrical position. During 30 days after surgery one patient died (1.2%). Surgery was necessary in 10 patients (17.5%) due to postoperative complications after IOBRT which included intraperitoneal abscess (2 cases), fecal fistula (2 cases), wound dehiscence (2 cases), adhesive mechanical ileus (1 case), duodenal fistula (1 case), hemorrhage (1 case), and massive hydroperitonia (1 case). The complications appeared only in patients operated due to recurrences of retroperitoneal sarcoma. In the group of patients after adjuvant EBRT (34 cases), the most common late complication was symptoms of chronic, recurrent mechanical sub-ileus of intestine (6/34 patients: 17.6%). Two patients in late postoperative periods underwent surgery due to mechanical ileus symptoms (in one case with accompanying intestinal fistula: the patient died because of complications), in 15 and 26 months after the primary BRT and surgery. In a distant period of time, one abscess and rib necrosis in field of EBRT occurred. Two patients were complaining about symptoms of peripheral neuropathy.

The estimated 5 year overall survival (OS) in group of 57 patients after IOBRT was 50% (mean value: 58 months) (Fig. 4). At the end of follow-up, 30 patients were alive (53%), 18 (32%) died due to progression of the disease, while 8 patients (14%) died from reasons not associated with sarcoma progression (5 cases – all medical reasons, mainly circulatory system; 3 cases - treatment complications).

Fig. 4

Overall Survival (OS) of patients with retroperitoneal sarcomas in IOBRT group

In univariate analysis the important factors negatively influenced the OS of patients with retroperitoneal sarcoma under IOBRT were as follows: sarcoma recurrence surgery (p = 0.002) (Fig. 5), higher grade of sarcoma histological malignancy (p = 0.005) (Fig. 6), histological type different than liposarcoma (p = 0.05) and lack of adjuvant therapy of EBRT (p = 0.05) (Table 2). In multivariate analysis, the independent factors of OS were: sarcoma recurrence surgery (p = 0.02) and histological type different than liposarcoma (p = 0.04) (Table 3). The actual 3-year overall survival rate was 82% for patients operated due to primary retroperitoneal sarcoma and 50% for patients operated due to recurrence of retroperitoneal sarcoma, previously operated in another clinic; OS reached 76% in retroperitoneal sarcoma group of patient with G1 histological grade of malignancy, compared with 48 % for G2/G3 tumors; 71% – for liposarcoma patients, compared with 37% for other histological sarcomas; 70% – for additional postoperative radiotherapy patient, compared with 43,5% of patients without additional EBRT. No substantial differences in overall survival rate was noticed regarding the size of operated tumor, sex and the number of removed adjoining organs (Table 2). The estimated 5-year local recurrence free survival (LRFS) in 57 patients after IOBRT was 65% (Fig. 7).

Fig. 5

Overall Survival (OS) of retroperitoneal sarcoma patients in IOBRT group according to prime tumor surgery (P) or recurrence surgery (W)

Fig. 6

Overall Survival (OS) of retroperitoneal sarcomas patients treated with IOBRT according to histological grade of sarcoma malignancy

Table 2

Prognostic factors influencing overall survival (OS) and local recurrence free survival (LRFS) after brachytherapy (BRT) – univariate analysis

Prognostic factor	OS	LRFS
	P value
Malignancy grade (G1 vs G2/3)	0.05	n.s.
Histopathological type (liposarcoma vs inne)	0.05	n.s.
Previous surgery (0, ≥1) [primary tumour vs recurrence]	0.002	0.008
EBRT postoperative vs no EBRT	0.05	0.01
Size of sarcoma (≤ 10 cm vs. > 10 cm)	n.s.	n.s.
Sex	n.s.	n.s.
Number of resected organs (0. 1, > 1) during RS surgery	n.s.	n.s.

n.s. – statistically no significant

Table 3

Independent prognostic factors for overall survival rates in retroperitoneal sarcomas, treated with intraoperative brachytherapy – multivariate analysis

Unfavorable prognostic factors	Hazard ratio	Wald ratio	Standard error	P value
Surgery due to recurrent tumour	10.2	4.99	1.03	0.02[1]
Histopathological type other then liposarcoma	1.15	4.16	0.05	0.04[1]
Malignancy grade G2/G3	1.31	0.40	0.43	0.52
Lack of postoperative EBRT	1.69	1.81	0.39	0.18

statistically important

Fig. 7

Overall Local Recurrence Free Survival in retroperitoneal sarcoma patients treated with IOBRT

On the basis of univariate analysis, the significant factors negatively inclined LRFS of retroperitoneal sarcoma patients after IOBRT were: sarcoma recurrence surgery (p = 0.008) and lack of EBRT (p = 0.01) (Fig. 8). The multivariate LRFS analysis was not carried out in regards to methodological limitation.

Fig. 8

Overall Local Recurrence Free Survival in patients with retroperitoneal sarcoma treated with IOBRT according to adjuvant postoperative EBRT

The actuarial 3-year LRFS was 100% for patients operated due to primary retroperitoneal sarcoma and only 66% for patients operated due to recurrence of retroperitoneal sarcoma that were previously operated in different clinic. LRFS reached 87% in patients with postoperative radiotherapy compared with 57% of patients without additional radiotherapy. No significant differences were estimated in LRFS regarding the size of operated tumor, sarcoma malignancy grade, histological type, sex and the number of removed adjacent organs (Table 2).

24 cases (42%) of recurrences were noticed: liver recurrences (n = 3; 12.5%), lung recurrences (n = 3; 12.5%), bone recurrence (n = 1; 4%) – mainly local and intraperitoneal recurrences.

Since 2000, a total number of 34 patients qualified for treatment (60% of all) and additional EBRT was performed (usually in 30 days after the main combined IOBRT/surgery; in most of the cases the time gap was larger due to wound-healing process and radiation planning procedure). Some patients were disqualified from postoperative radiotherapy due to following reasons: previous radiotherapy given in another clinic, bad general condition, intestine fistula, disease progression. All patients, with the exception of 3 (one case of no-tumor related neurological disorders, one case of radiation induced enteronitis and one patient’s resignation from further participation in the study after reception of 36 Gy dose) received presumed dose of 50 Gy.

Discussion

Retroperitoneal sarcomas are a rare group of malignant cancers usually with bad prognosis [24]. However, series of publications were released with multiple sets of data regarding the treatment results of patients with this type of cancer. [18, 23–32]. It seem like the best option for the longest distant survival rate is a radical resection during the primary surgery of retroperitoneal sarcoma [6, 18, 32, 33]. However, such surgery is not always possible due to large size of the tumor and deep infiltration of adjoining organs. Distant metastases of retroperitoneal sarcomas are rare [33]. In most cases the reason for failure of treatment is local recurrence. Such observation is confirmed by results of this study in which over 70% of recurrences can be qualified as local recurrences. This is to imply that the upgrading of local treatment can be transmitted into a better cure rate. Furthermore, strong scientific evidence confirms that additional EBRT improves local control with association of surgery in trunk or extremities sarcoma locations, with absence of microscopically radical margins [19, 34]. Similar publications regarding combined treatment (surgery and EBRT) in retroperitoneal sarcoma demonstrate decrease of local recurrences rate [14, 35, 36]. Series of studies where EBRT was used in adult soft tissue sarcoma patients show precise correlation with percentage of local recurrence and radiation dose [34, 37]. The effective therapeutic dose (above 60 Gy) is not possible to be acquired in case of retroperitoneal sarcoma due to tumor proximity with organs at risk such as intestines, parenchyma organs and large vessels in potential radiation field.

Intraoperative radiation with the use of electron accelerator or HDR BRT (used in our Clinic) is the alternative way of treatment to EBRT in case of soft tissue sarcoma with high malignancy level [26, 38, 39]. Brachytherapy allows high radiation dose application on site of removed sarcoma (place of high risk of local recurrence) and at the same time secures from unnecessary irradiation of critical organs that could be found in the radiation field [22, 26, 35, 39]. Theoretical advantage of brachytherapy is a direct visualization of a treated field that allows better control of irradiated area and the usage of higher radiation dose. Biological effectiveness of such sole dose results in 2 to 5 times better efficiency than in case of dose fractionation in traditional way (directly into site of removed sarcoma) [40]. Such way of radiation allows effective saving of surrounding tissues in comparison with preoperative or postoperative radiotherapy. IOBRT can be combined with EBRT and therefore making it possible to increase the total radiation dose to more than 65 Gy. Such proceedings theoretically allow significant improvement of local control [29, 37].

In our study, one of the largest in the world, 68% of patients operated for retroperitoneal sarcoma received IOBRT. Furthermore, 60% of patients received additional postoperative BRT. It is difficult to establish the complications of radiotherapy due to series of complexities connected to extensive and prolonged surgical treatment or towel pressure (ischemia), isolating critical organs from intraoperative field irradiation. Frequently, the surgical procedures were very extensive, demanding removal of adjoining organs along with sarcoma (80% of cases). This is to imply that such type of procedure should be performed in specialized and experienced centres by qualified anesthesiologists, radiotherapists and oncologists surgeons. The reports regarding benefits of BRT application in soft tissues sarcoma treatment are still ambiguous [34, 35]. The results of this study correlate with some uncommon findings from other medical centers. They show the tendency to improve local control with the use of intraoperative radiotherapy [22, 36].

Somewhat different matter of substance constitutes BRT combined with EBRT. In case of sarcomas with extracompartmental localization such as retroperitoneal sarcomas and local recurrences, it might be essential to apply larger spectrum of radiation like BRT combined with EBRT [35]. EBRT can be used as an addition to pre- or post- operative treatment [15, 16, 21, 22, 36, 41–44]. In the original study protocol presented within this work, EBRT was employed as an additional postoperative treatment after IOBRT application. Furthermore, obtained results of such additional therapy application appear to be necessary in combined treatment of retroperitoneal sarcomas. Within the group of postoperative additional EBRT patients, local control of tumor and better (70%) overall survival rate was significantly achieved. The combination of these two radiotherapy techniques permits to achieve appropriate large total therapeutic dose. The possibility of preoperative additional radiotherapy application in case of retroperitoneal sarcomas remains debatable. Theoretically, such type of treatment could bring certain benefits in consideration of common delays or disqualification for postoperative EBRT due to concurrent complications in extensive surgeries, as well as improved definition of radiation field with the use of preoperative radiotherapy [45, 46]. Other methods of treatment including systematic chemotherapy (except microcellular sarcomas of Ewing’s sarcomas) or intraperitoneal therapy do not present significant influence in treatment improvement.

Overall survival rate or local recurrence survival of the studied group of patients are comparable with other international results of analyzed group of retroperitoneal sarcomas patients. However, the majority of literature information are formulated on the basis of small group of patients with divergent data (5 year survival rate oscillating between 12% to 70%) [6, 15, 18, 23, 25, 32, 33, 47–59]. Moreover, it is difficult to find present – day data of patients treated with surgery as a sole way of treatment. The analysis published by Royal Marsden Hospital in London [18] revealed that 20% of 5-year survival, whereas in our study 5-year survival in brachytherapy patients is 50%. What is also significant, other Polish results of surgically treated retroperitoneal sarcomas patients with no extensive, multi-organ “en-bloc” resection and IOBRT/surgery, showed only 34% of 5-year overall survival and 23% of 5-year of asymptomatic survival [52]. This results seem to be much worse than in our group of patients. Storm and Mahvi [60] demonstrated 72% of 5-year local recurrence free survival in group of 204 of retroperitoneal sarcomas patients after macroscopic radical surgical treatment. This study correlates findings of our group of patients as 65% of 5-year local recurrence free survival after intensive surgical treatment combined with IOBRT.

Surgical procedure allowing “en-bloc” sarcoma removal along with at least one of adjoining organs in order to obtain large margin of resection, enables significant improvement of retroperitoneal sarcomas treatment results [53, 55]. Apart from histological malignancy level, the quality of surgical treatment represents the most significant factor to influence the results of retroperitoneal sarcomas treatment. Recently published analyses of French and Italian scientists confirm this observations [55, 61–64].

The group of patients in our study mostly consisted of patients with high histological malignancy level of sarcomas. The histological malignancy level is the most important prognosis factor for overall survival in soft tissue sarcoma patients as well as in retroperitoneal sarcomas patients [53, 57, 59, 65] confirmed by above data. Majority of patients were operated not because of primary sarcoma, but due to local recurrence after ineffective treatment beyond our Centre. Unfortunately, treatment of local recurrence is associated (in significant percentage of cases) with consecutive local recurrence. In group of patients presented in international literature, the predominated group consisted of patients operated primarily not due to recurrence [32, 54, 56–58]. In our study we confirmed that treatment of primary retroperitoneal sarcomas is one of the major factor influencing prognosis ( on the basis of multivariate analysis with its limitation resulting from numerical amount of cases in analyzed group). The results of our study present that in order to achieve such good treatment results, despite significantly substantial amount of patients operated due to recurrence of retroperitoneal sarcoma, is associated with the application of IOBRT followed by postoperative EBRT.

Under ideal circumstances, patients with primary retroperitoneal sarcoma should be instantly directed for combined treatment. It is important to emphasize that the appropriate planning of the treatment procedure and realization of planed therapeutic protocol in centers with adequate experience in this field is the major factor that influence the improvement of results of overall survival and local recurrence free survival in patients with retroperitoneal sarcoma.

Conclusions

The case study formulation of combined treatment of retroperitoneal sarcoma patients was evaluated on the basis of one – centre group of sarcoma patients qualified for combined treatment (surgery + IOBRT) and it was possible to conduct in 68% of patients. Additional EBRT is a necessary procedure in order to diminish local recurrences. Presented results: 50% of 5-year OS and 65% of 5-year LFRS are comparable with the results of major international oncologic centers. The outcomes account for the necessity of further investigations in order to improve the effects of combined retroperitoneal sarcoma treatment. The amount of complications in our study is quite high, however acceptable, taking into consideration very extensive, multi-organ surgical procedures with frequent cases of local recurrences. Presented analysis show that the improvement of treatment results in retroperitoneal sarcoma patients is genuinely achievable in case of primal treatment performed in high- specialist oncologic centre with possible application of brachytherapy and radiotherapy as well as experience and appropriate knowledge in treatment of retroperitoneal sarcoma patients.