BACKGROUND: Surgery remains to be the main therapeutic approach for retroperitoneal sarcomas (RPS) although evidence supports that complementary radiotherapy increases local-control and survival. We present a multidisciplinary management and experience of a tertiary cancer center in the treatment of RPS and analyze current evidence of radiotherapy efficacy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 19 patients with primary or relapsed RPS treated between November 2009 and October 2018. Multidisciplinary approach comprised complete resection in 15 patients (79%) achieving resection R0 in 11 patients (58%), R1 in 4 patients (21%) and R2 in 2 patients (10%). Seven patients (37%) underwent a preoperative radiation (PRORT), 10 patients (53%), post-operative radiation (PORT) and 2 patients (10%), received radiotherapy exclusively. Ten patients (53%) received adjuvant chemotherapy. RESULTS: With a median follow-up of 24 months (2-114 months), actuarial rates of loco-regional relapse free survival (LRFS) at 1, 2 and 3 years were 77%, 77% and 67%, respectively. Actuarial rates of distant-metastases-free survival (DMFS), disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) at 1, 2 and 3 years were 100%, 100% and 80% for DMFS; 94%, 77% and 67% for DFS and 100%, 91% and 91% for OS, respectively. Only surgical margins (negative vs. positive) showed significance for 3y-LRFS: 100% vs. 34.3%, p = 0.018. Treatment tolerance was acceptable with no acute or late toxicity higher than grade 2. CONCLUSIONS: Complementary radiotherapy appears to be useful and well tolerated for the multidisciplinary management of RPS. Presence of positive surgical margins seems to be the most relevant prognostic factor through the follow-up.
BACKGROUND: Surgery remains to be the main therapeutic approach for retroperitoneal sarcomas (RPS) although evidence supports that complementary radiotherapy increases local-control and survival. We present a multidisciplinary management and experience of a tertiary cancer center in the treatment of RPS and analyze current evidence of radiotherapy efficacy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 19 patients with primary or relapsed RPS treated between November 2009 and October 2018. Multidisciplinary approach comprised complete resection in 15 patients (79%) achieving resection R0 in 11 patients (58%), R1 in 4 patients (21%) and R2 in 2 patients (10%). Seven patients (37%) underwent a preoperative radiation (PRORT), 10 patients (53%), post-operative radiation (PORT) and 2 patients (10%), received radiotherapy exclusively. Ten patients (53%) received adjuvant chemotherapy. RESULTS: With a median follow-up of 24 months (2-114 months), actuarial rates of loco-regional relapse free survival (LRFS) at 1, 2 and 3 years were 77%, 77% and 67%, respectively. Actuarial rates of distant-metastases-free survival (DMFS), disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) at 1, 2 and 3 years were 100%, 100% and 80% for DMFS; 94%, 77% and 67% for DFS and 100%, 91% and 91% for OS, respectively. Only surgical margins (negative vs. positive) showed significance for 3y-LRFS: 100% vs. 34.3%, p = 0.018. Treatment tolerance was acceptable with no acute or late toxicity higher than grade 2. CONCLUSIONS: Complementary radiotherapy appears to be useful and well tolerated for the multidisciplinary management of RPS. Presence of positive surgical margins seems to be the most relevant prognostic factor through the follow-up.
Authors: H L Gieschen; I J Spiro; H D Suit; M J Ott; D W Rattner; M Ancukiewicz; C G Willett Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2001-05-01 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Alessandro Gronchi; Stefano Ferrari; Vittorio Quagliuolo; Javier Martin Broto; Antonio Lopez Pousa; Giovanni Grignani; Umberto Basso; Jean-Yves Blay; Oscar Tendero; Robert Diaz Beveridge; Virginia Ferraresi; Iwona Lugowska; Domenico Franco Merlo; Valeria Fontana; Emanuela Marchesi; Davide Maria Donati; Elena Palassini; Emanuela Palmerini; Rita De Sanctis; Carlo Morosi; Silvia Stacchiotti; Silvia Bagué; Jean Michelle Coindre; Angelo Paolo Dei Tos; Piero Picci; Paolo Bruzzi; Paolo Giovanni Casali Journal: Lancet Oncol Date: 2017-05-09 Impact factor: 41.316
Authors: Sagus Sampath; Ying J Hitchcock; Dennis C Shrieve; R Lor Randall; Timothy E Schultheiss; Jeffrey Y C Wong Journal: J Surg Oncol Date: 2010-04-01 Impact factor: 3.454
Authors: Alberto Bossi; Ivo De Wever; Erik Van Limbergen; Bianca Vanstraelen Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2006-11-02 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Wirginiusz Dziewirski; Piotr Rutkowski; Zbigniew I Nowecki; Tadeusz Morysinski; Maciej Sałamacha; Anna Kulik; Maria Kawczynska; Anetta Kasprowicz; Jarosław Łyczek; Włodzimierz Ruka Journal: J Contemp Brachytherapy Date: 2010-04-01
Authors: Christopher L Tinkle; Charu Singh; Shane Lloyd; Yian Guo; Yimei Li; Alberto S Pappo; Steven G DuBois; John T Lucas; Daphne A Haas-Kogan; Stephanie A Terezakis; Steve E Braunstein; Matthew J Krasin Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2020-11-28 Impact factor: 7.038