Literature DB >> 28027290

Single-Cell-Based Analysis Highlights a Surge in Cell-to-Cell Molecular Variability Preceding Irreversible Commitment in a Differentiation Process.

Angélique Richard1, Loïs Boullu2,3,4, Ulysse Herbach1,2,3, Arnaud Bonnafoux1,2,5, Valérie Morin6, Elodie Vallin1, Anissa Guillemin1, Nan Papili Gao7,8, Rudiyanto Gunawan7,8, Jérémie Cosette9, Ophélie Arnaud10, Jean-Jacques Kupiec11, Thibault Espinasse3, Sandrine Gonin-Giraud1, Olivier Gandrillon1,2.   

Abstract

In some recent studies, a view emerged that stochastic dynamics governing the switching of cells from one differentiation state to another could be characterized by a peak in gene expression variability at the point of fate commitment. We have tested this hypothesis at the single-cell level by analyzing primary chicken erythroid progenitors through their differentiation process and measuring the expression of selected genes at six sequential time-points after induction of differentiation. In contrast to population-based expression data, single-cell gene expression data revealed a high cell-to-cell variability, which was masked by averaging. We were able to show that the correlation network was a very dynamical entity and that a subgroup of genes tend to follow the predictions from the dynamical network biomarker (DNB) theory. In addition, we also identified a small group of functionally related genes encoding proteins involved in sterol synthesis that could act as the initial drivers of the differentiation. In order to assess quantitatively the cell-to-cell variability in gene expression and its evolution in time, we used Shannon entropy as a measure of the heterogeneity. Entropy values showed a significant increase in the first 8 h of the differentiation process, reaching a peak between 8 and 24 h, before decreasing to significantly lower values. Moreover, we observed that the previous point of maximum entropy precedes two paramount key points: an irreversible commitment to differentiation between 24 and 48 h followed by a significant increase in cell size variability at 48 h. In conclusion, when analyzed at the single cell level, the differentiation process looks very different from its classical population average view. New observables (like entropy) can be computed, the behavior of which is fully compatible with the idea that differentiation is not a "simple" program that all cells execute identically but results from the dynamical behavior of the underlying molecular network.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 28027290      PMCID: PMC5191835          DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1002585

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PLoS Biol        ISSN: 1544-9173            Impact factor:   8.029


  86 in total

1.  High expression of heat shock protein 90 alpha and its significance in human acute leukemia cells.

Authors:  Wen-Liang Tian; Fei He; Xue Fu; Jun-Tang Lin; Ping Tang; Yu-Min Huang; Rong Guo; Ling Sun
Journal:  Gene       Date:  2014-03-25       Impact factor: 3.688

2.  The reduction of gene expression variability from single cells to populations follows simple statistical laws.

Authors:  Vincent Piras; Kumar Selvarajoo
Journal:  Genomics       Date:  2014-12-29       Impact factor: 5.736

Review 3.  Computational and analytical challenges in single-cell transcriptomics.

Authors:  Oliver Stegle; Sarah A Teichmann; John C Marioni
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2015-01-28       Impact factor: 53.242

4.  Terminal differentiation of normal chicken erythroid progenitors: shortening of G1 correlates with loss of D-cyclin/cdk4 expression and altered cell size control.

Authors:  H Dolznig; P Bartunek; K Nasmyth; E W Müllner; H Beug
Journal:  Cell Growth Differ       Date:  1995-11

5.  TGF-beta cooperates with TGF-alpha to induce the self-renewal of normal erythrocytic progenitors: evidence for an autocrine mechanism.

Authors:  O Gandrillon; U Schmidt; H Beug; J Samarut
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  1999-05-17       Impact factor: 11.598

6.  Secondary structure in the 3' UTR of EGF and the choice of reverse transcriptases affect the detection of message diversity by RT-PCR.

Authors:  E M Brooks; L G Sheflin; S W Spaulding
Journal:  Biotechniques       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 1.993

7.  Cell-state-specific metabolic dependency in hematopoiesis and leukemogenesis.

Authors:  Ying-Hua Wang; William J Israelsen; Dongjun Lee; Vionnie W C Yu; Nathaniel T Jeanson; Clary B Clish; Lewis C Cantley; Matthew G Vander Heiden; David T Scadden
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2014-09-11       Impact factor: 41.582

8.  Inferring the kinetics of stochastic gene expression from single-cell RNA-sequencing data.

Authors:  Jong Kyoung Kim; John C Marioni
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2013-01-28       Impact factor: 13.583

9.  HTSeq--a Python framework to work with high-throughput sequencing data.

Authors:  Simon Anders; Paul Theodor Pyl; Wolfgang Huber
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2014-09-25       Impact factor: 6.937

10.  Cell-cycle control of developmentally regulated transcription factors accounts for heterogeneity in human pluripotent cells.

Authors:  Amar M Singh; James Chappell; Robert Trost; Li Lin; Tao Wang; Jie Tang; Brittany K Matlock; Kevin P Weller; Hao Wu; Shaying Zhao; Peng Jin; Stephen Dalton
Journal:  Stem Cell Reports       Date:  2013-12-05       Impact factor: 7.765

View more
  56 in total

1.  Embracing Systems Toxicology at Single-Cell Resolution.

Authors:  Qiang Zhang; W Michael Caudle; Jingbo Pi; Sudin Bhattacharya; Melvin E Andersen; Norbert E Kaminski; Rory B Conolly
Journal:  Curr Opin Toxicol       Date:  2019-04-19

2.  Identifying pre-disease signals before metabolic syndrome in mice by dynamical network biomarkers.

Authors:  Keiichi Koizumi; Makito Oku; Shusaku Hayashi; Akiko Inujima; Naotoshi Shibahara; Luonan Chen; Yoshiko Igarashi; Kazuyuki Tobe; Shigeru Saito; Makoto Kadowaki; Kazuyuki Aihara
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-06-24       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 3.  Statistical mechanics meets single-cell biology.

Authors:  Andrew E Teschendorff; Andrew P Feinberg
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2021-04-19       Impact factor: 53.242

4.  Cell lineage and communication network inference via optimization for single-cell transcriptomics.

Authors:  Shuxiong Wang; Matthew Karikomi; Adam L MacLean; Qing Nie
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2019-06-20       Impact factor: 16.971

5.  Dynamic edge-based biomarker non-invasively predicts hepatocellular carcinoma with hepatitis B virus infection for individual patients based on blood testing.

Authors:  Yiyu Lu; Zhaoyuan Fang; Meiyi Li; Qian Chen; Tao Zeng; Lina Lu; Qilong Chen; Hui Zhang; Qianmei Zhou; Yan Sun; Xuefeng Xue; Yiyang Hu; Luonan Chen; Shibing Su
Journal:  J Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2019-08-19       Impact factor: 6.216

6.  Investigating higher-order interactions in single-cell data with scHOT.

Authors:  John C Marioni; Jean Yee Hwa Yang; Shila Ghazanfar; Yingxin Lin; Xianbin Su; David Ming Lin; Ellis Patrick; Ze-Guang Han
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2020-07-13       Impact factor: 28.547

7.  Cell lineage specification at single cell resolution.

Authors:  Jian Yang; Pentao Liu
Journal:  Stem Cell Investig       Date:  2017-09-19

Review 8.  Criticality in cell differentiation.

Authors:  Indrani Bose; Mainak Pal
Journal:  J Biosci       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 1.826

9.  Detecting the tipping points in a three-state model of complex diseases by temporal differential networks.

Authors:  Pei Chen; Yongjun Li; Xiaoping Liu; Rui Liu; Luonan Chen
Journal:  J Transl Med       Date:  2017-10-26       Impact factor: 5.531

10.  Individual-specific edge-network analysis for disease prediction.

Authors:  Xiangtian Yu; Jingsong Zhang; Shaoyan Sun; Xin Zhou; Tao Zeng; Luonan Chen
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2017-11-16       Impact factor: 16.971

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.