Literature DB >> 17996013

Mesophyll conductance to CO2: current knowledge and future prospects.

Jaume Flexas1, Miquel Ribas-Carbó, Antonio Diaz-Espejo, Jeroni Galmés, Hipólito Medrano.   

Abstract

During photosynthesis, CO2 moves from the atmosphere (C(a)) surrounding the leaf to the sub-stomatal internal cavities (C(i)) through stomata, and from there to the site of carboxylation inside the chloroplast stroma (C(c)) through the leaf mesophyll. The latter CO2 diffusion component is called mesophyll conductance (g(m)), and can be divided in at least three components, that is, conductance through intercellular air spaces (g(ias)), through cell wall (g(w)) and through the liquid phase inside cells (g(liq)). A large body of evidence has accumulated in the past two decades indicating that g(m) is sufficiently small as to significantly decrease C(c) relative to C(i), therefore limiting photosynthesis. Moreover, g(m) is not constant, and it changes among species and in response to environmental factors. In addition, there is now evidence that g(liq) and, in some cases, g(w), are the main determinants of g(m). Mesophyll conductance is very dynamic, changing in response to environmental variables as rapid or even faster than stomatal conductance (i.e. within seconds to minutes). A revision of current knowledge on g(m) is presented. Firstly, a historical perspective is given, highlighting the founding works and methods, followed by a re-examination of the range of variation of g(m) among plant species and functional groups, and a revision of the responses of g(m) to different external (biotic and abiotic) and internal (developmental, structural and metabolic) factors. The possible physiological bases for g(m), including aquaporins and carbonic anhydrases, are discussed. Possible ecological implications for variable g(m) are indicated, and the errors induced by neglecting g(m) when interpreting photosynthesis and carbon isotope discrimination models are highlighted. Finally, a series of research priorities for the near future are proposed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17996013     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-3040.2007.01757.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plant Cell Environ        ISSN: 0140-7791            Impact factor:   7.228


  157 in total

1.  Leaf functional anatomy in relation to photosynthesis.

Authors:  Ichiro Terashima; Yuko T Hanba; Danny Tholen; Ülo Niinemets
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2010-11-12       Impact factor: 8.340

2.  The prospect of using cyanobacterial bicarbonate transporters to improve leaf photosynthesis in C3 crop plants.

Authors:  G Dean Price; Murray R Badger; Susanne von Caemmerer
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2010-10-05       Impact factor: 8.340

Review 3.  The importance of nutritional regulation of plant water flux.

Authors:  Michael D Cramer; Heidi-Jayne Hawkins; G Anthony Verboom
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2009-05-16       Impact factor: 3.225

Review 4.  Photosynthesis under drought and salt stress: regulation mechanisms from whole plant to cell.

Authors:  M M Chaves; J Flexas; C Pinheiro
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2008-07-28       Impact factor: 4.357

5.  The role of Rubisco and cell walls in the interspecific variation in photosynthetic capacity.

Authors:  Kouki Hikosaka; Aki Shigeno
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2009-03-14       Impact factor: 3.225

6.  Carbon isotope fractionation during photorespiration and carboxylation in Senecio.

Authors:  Gary J Lanigan; Nicholas Betson; Howard Griffiths; Ulli Seibt
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2008-10-15       Impact factor: 8.340

7.  Photosynthetic characterization of Rubisco transplantomic lines reveals alterations on photochemistry and mesophyll conductance.

Authors:  Jeroni Galmés; Juan Alejandro Perdomo; Jaume Flexas; Spencer M Whitney
Journal:  Photosynth Res       Date:  2013-05-24       Impact factor: 3.573

8.  Using multiple trait associations to define hydraulic functional types in plant communities of south-western Australia.

Authors:  Patrick J Mitchell; Erik J Veneklaas; Hans Lambers; Stephen S O Burgess
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2008-10-07       Impact factor: 3.225

9.  Stomatal crypts have small effects on transpiration: a numerical model analysis.

Authors:  Anita Roth-Nebelsick; Foteini Hassiotou; Erik J Veneklaas
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2009-10-28       Impact factor: 8.340

10.  Coupling physiological analysis with proteomic profile to understand the photosynthetic responses of young Euterpe oleracea palms to drought.

Authors:  Hellen Oliveira de Oliveira; Gledson Luiz Salgado de Castro; Lorena Oliveira Correa; Walter Vellasco Duarte Silvestre; Sidney Vasconcelos do Nascimento; Rafael Borges da Silva Valadares; Guilherme Corrêa de Oliveira; Rodolfo Inacio Nunes Santos; Reginaldo Alves Festucci-Buselli; Hugo Alves Pinheiro
Journal:  Photosynth Res       Date:  2018-10-24       Impact factor: 3.573

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.