Literature DB >> 28018735

Using DRS during breast conserving surgery: identifying robust optical parameters and influence of inter-patient variation.

Lisanne L de Boer1, Benno H W Hendriks2, Frederieke van Duijnhoven1, Marie-Jeanne T F D Vrancken Peeters-Baas1, Koen Van de Vijver1, Claudette E Loo1, Katarzyna Jóźwiak1, Henricus J C M Sterenborg3, Theo J M Ruers4.   

Abstract

Successful breast conserving surgery consists of complete removal of the tumor while sparing healthy surrounding tissue. Despite currently available imaging and margin assessment tools, recognizing tumor tissue at a resection margin during surgery is challenging. Diffuse reflectance spectroscopy (DRS), which uses light for tissue characterization, can potentially guide surgeons to prevent tumor positive margins. However, inter-patient variation and changes in tissue physiology occurring during the resection might hamper this light-based technology. Here we investigate how inter-patient variation and tissue status (in vivo vs ex vivo) affect the performance of the DRS optical parameters. In vivo and ex vivo measurements of 45 breast cancer patients were obtained and quantified with an analytical model to acquire the optical parameters. The optical parameter representing the ratio between fat and water provided the best discrimination between normal and tumor tissue, with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.94. There was no substantial influence of other patient factors such as menopausal status on optical measurements. Contrary to expectations, normalization of the optical parameters did not improve the discriminative power. Furthermore, measurements taken in vivo were not significantly different from the measurements taken ex vivo. These findings indicate that DRS is a robust technology for the detection of tumor tissue during breast conserving surgery.

Entities:  

Keywords:  (060.2310) Fiber optics; (170.6935) Tissue characterization; (300.0300) Spectroscopy

Year:  2016        PMID: 28018735      PMCID: PMC5175562          DOI: 10.1364/BOE.7.005188

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biomed Opt Express        ISSN: 2156-7085            Impact factor:   3.732


  37 in total

1.  Characterization of normal breast tissue heterogeneity using time-resolved near-infrared spectroscopy.

Authors:  Tomas Svensson; Johannes Swartling; Paola Taroni; Alessandro Torricelli; Pia Lindblom; Christian Ingvar; Stefan Andersson-Engels
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2005-05-18       Impact factor: 3.609

2.  Analysis of parenchymal density on mammograms in 1353 women 25-79 years old.

Authors:  P C Stomper; D J D'Souza; P A DiNitto; M A Arredondo
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 3.959

3.  Intraoperative Assessment of Final Margins with a Handheld Optical Imaging Probe During Breast-Conserving Surgery May Reduce the Reoperation Rate: Results of a Multicenter Study.

Authors:  Adam M Zysk; Kai Chen; Edward Gabrielson; Lorraine Tafra; Evelyn A May Gonzalez; Joseph K Canner; Eric B Schneider; Andrew J Cittadine; P Scott Carney; Stephen A Boppart; Kimiko Tsuchiya; Kristen Sawyer; Lisa K Jacobs
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2015-07-23       Impact factor: 5.344

4.  Quantitative optical spectroscopy: a robust tool for direct measurement of breast cancer vascular oxygenation and total hemoglobin content in vivo.

Authors:  J Quincy Brown; Lee G Wilke; Joseph Geradts; Stephanie A Kennedy; Gregory M Palmer; Nirmala Ramanujam
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2009-03-17       Impact factor: 12.701

5.  Evaluation of the in vivo and ex vivo optical properties in a mouse ear model.

Authors:  E Salomatina; A N Yaroslavsky
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2008-05-01       Impact factor: 3.609

6.  In vivo optical spectroscopy for improved detection of pancreatic adenocarcinoma: a feasibility study.

Authors:  William R Lloyd; Robert H Wilson; Seung Yup Lee; Malavika Chandra; Barbara McKenna; Diane Simeone; James Scheiman; Mary-Ann Mycek
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2013-12-02       Impact factor: 3.732

Review 7.  Pathology of breast carcinomas after neoadjuvant chemotherapy: an overview with recommendations on specimen processing and reporting.

Authors:  Sunati Sahoo; Susan C Lester
Journal:  Arch Pathol Lab Med       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 5.534

8.  Towards intra-operative diagnosis of tumours during breast conserving surgery by selective-sampling Raman micro-spectroscopy.

Authors:  Kenny Kong; Fazliyana Zaabar; Emad Rakha; Ian Ellis; Alexey Koloydenko; Ioan Notingher
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2014-09-25       Impact factor: 3.609

9.  The impact of use of an intraoperative margin assessment device on re-excision rates.

Authors:  Molly Sebastian; Stephanie Akbari; Beth Anglin; Erin H Lin; Alice M Police
Journal:  Springerplus       Date:  2015-04-28

10.  Effects of tissue heterogeneity on the optical estimate of breast density.

Authors:  Paola Taroni; Antonio Pifferi; Giovanna Quarto; Lorenzo Spinelli; Alessandro Torricelli; Francesca Abbate; Nicola Balestreri; Serena Ganino; Simona Menna; Enrico Cassano; Rinaldo Cubeddu
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2012-09-06       Impact factor: 3.732

View more
  9 in total

1.  Optimizing algorithm development for tissue classification in colorectal cancer based on diffuse reflectance spectra.

Authors:  Elisabeth J M Baltussen; Henricus J C M Sterenborg; Theo J M Ruers; Behdad Dashtbozorg
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2019-11-05       Impact factor: 3.732

2.  Broadband hyperspectral imaging for breast tumor detection using spectral and spatial information.

Authors:  Esther Kho; Behdad Dashtbozorg; Lisanne L de Boer; Koen K Van de Vijver; Henricus J C M Sterenborg; Theo J M Ruers
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2019-08-07       Impact factor: 3.732

3.  Tissue-mimicking phantom materials with tunable optical properties suitable for assessment of diffuse reflectance spectroscopy during electrosurgery.

Authors:  Sara Azizian Amiri; Pieter Van Berckel; Marco Lai; Jenny Dankelman; Benno H W Hendriks
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2022-04-04       Impact factor: 3.562

4.  Diffuse reflectance spectroscopy of human liver tumor specimens - towards a tissue differentiating optical biopsy needle using light emitting diodes.

Authors:  Alina Keller; Piotr Bialecki; Torsten Johannes Wilhelm; Marcus Klaus Vetter
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2018-02-08       Impact factor: 3.732

5.  In vivo nerve identification in head and neck surgery using diffuse reflectance spectroscopy.

Authors:  Gerrit C Langhout; Koert F D Kuhlmann; Pim Schreuder; Torre Bydlon; Ludi E Smeele; Michiel W M van den Brekel; Henricus J C M Sterenborg; Benno H W Hendriks; Theo J M Ruers
Journal:  Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol       Date:  2018-08-09

6.  Towards the use of diffuse reflectance spectroscopy for real-time in vivo detection of breast cancer during surgery.

Authors:  Lisanne L de Boer; Torre M Bydlon; Frederieke van Duijnhoven; Marie-Jeanne T F D Vranken Peeters; Claudette E Loo; Gonneke A O Winter-Warnars; Joyce Sanders; Henricus J C M Sterenborg; Benno H W Hendriks; Theo J M Ruers
Journal:  J Transl Med       Date:  2018-12-19       Impact factor: 5.531

7.  Proton density fat fraction of the spinal column: an MRI cadaver study.

Authors:  Merle S Losch; Akash Swamy; Adrian Elmi-Terander; Erik Edström; Benno H W Hendriks; Jenny Dankelman
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2021-01-07       Impact factor: 2.819

8.  Comparison of preprocessing techniques to reduce nontissue-related variations in hyperspectral reflectance imaging.

Authors:  Mark Witteveen; Hendricus J C M Sterenborg; Ton G van Leeuwen; Maurice C G Aalders; Theo J M Ruers; Anouk L Post
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2022-10       Impact factor: 3.758

9.  Optical scatter imaging of resected breast tumor structures matches the patterns of micro-computed tomography.

Authors:  Samuel S Streeter; Benjamin W Maloney; Rebecca A Zuurbier; Wendy A Wells; Richard J Barth; Keith D Paulsen; Brian W Pogue
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2021-06-01       Impact factor: 4.174

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.