| Literature DB >> 28018475 |
Jan W Arntzen1, Tania Trujillo2, Roland Butôt1, Klaas Vrieling3, Onno Schaap3, Jorge Gutiérrez-Rodríguez2, Iñigo Martínez-Solano4.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Hybrid zones are regions where individuals of two species meet and produce hybrid progeny, and are often regarded as natural laboratories to understand the process of species formation. Two microevolutionary processes can take place in hybrid zones, with opposing effects on population differentiation. Hybridization tends to produce genetic homogenization, reducing species differences, whereas the presence of mechanisms of reproductive isolation result in barriers to gene flow, maintaining or increasing differences between taxa.Entities:
Keywords: Cline analysis; Hybridization; Microsatellites; Morphology; SNPs; mtDNA
Year: 2016 PMID: 28018475 PMCID: PMC5168812 DOI: 10.1186/s12983-016-0184-7
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Zool ISSN: 1742-9994 Impact factor: 3.172
Location, position in the transect and sample size for 17 Bufo populations included in the study. Toads studied are adults except for populations 1–3 and 5 where tadpoles were sampled
| Locality | Coordinates | Altitude (m.a.s.l.) from Google Earth | Straight line distance from Beaulieu (km) | Sample size | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Population | Name | Northern latitude | Eastern longitude | Morphology (males, females) | Micro-satellites | SNPs | ||
| 1 | Le Poitrineau, Saumur | 47.281 | −0.132 | 65 | −168.68 | 0 | 12 | 12 |
| 2 | Étang du Perré | 47.526 | −0.020 | 92 | −140.34 | 0 | 8 | 8 |
| 3 | Les Tesnières, Durtal | 47.672 | −0.265 | 61 | −134.96 | 0 | 8 | 8 |
| 4 | Carrefour du Poteau, Jublains | 48.240 | −0.552 | 138 | −107.74 | 27 (13, 14) | 14 | 29 |
| 5 | Les Fontaines, Pré-en-Pail | 48.447 | −0.201 | 285 | −74.53 | 0 | 8 | 8 |
| 6 | Foret de Multonne, Mont des Avaloirs | 48.443 | −0.132 | 329 | −69.90 | 20 (18, 2) | 20 | 20 |
| 7 | Montmean, Bazoches-sur-Hoëne | 48.543 | 0.508 | 210 | −23.19 | 18 (15, 3) | 31 | 32 |
| 8 | La Couvendière, Mortagne au Perche | 48.572 | 0.595 | 223 | −16.34 | 22 (20, 2) | 22 | 22 |
| 9 | La Rosière, Foret du Perche et de la Trappe | 48.600 | 0.639 | 277 | −11.85 | 20 (18, 2) | 19 | 20 |
| 10 | Beaulieu | 48.679 | 0.746 | 203 | 0 | 52 (26, 26) | 40 | 52 |
| 11 | Chateau des Bois Francs | 48.719 | 0.832 | 201 | 7.73 | 2 (1, 1) | 10 | 10 |
| 12 | le Cottin | 48.724 | 0.827 | 204 | 7.72 | 18 (17,1) | 18 | 18 |
| 13 | Les Quatre Vouges | 48.800 | 1.016 | 175 | 23.95 | 15 (12, 3) | 23 | 23 |
| 14 | Mouettes | 48.896 | 1.363 | 131 | 51.34 | 2 (2, 0) | 10 | 10 |
| 15 | Mare du Bois, La Houssaye | 48.886 | 1.381 | 130 | 52.01 | 23 (22, 1) | 23 | 23 |
| 16 | Les Puits du Sarrasin, Erloy | 49.915 | 3.847 | 122 | 264.06 | 25 (15, 10) | 20 | 27 |
| 17 | Les Ajoncs, Audresselles | 50.821 | 1.602 | 8 | 246.10 | 22 (11, 11) | 14 | 22 |
| Total | 266 (190, 76) | 300 | 344 | |||||
| Missing data (%) | 0.0 | 1.8 | 1.2 | |||||
Fig. 1Location of 17 Bufo spinosus and B. bufo populations over a transect in northwestern France. The pie diagrams at the bottom show the observed mtDNA haplotype frequencies, with haplotypes typical for the species in red (B. spinosus) and blue (B. bufo). The B. bufo–B. spinosus hybrid population reported by [18] is shown by an X
Fig. 2Species specific morphometric character states across a Bufo spinosus to B. bufo transect in the northwest of France. Data points shown are average values for males in 13 populations (see Table 1). a size and shape of the metatarsus tubercle and b positioning of the parotoids
Molecular genetic characteristics across 17 populations in a Bufo spinosus to B. bufo transect in the northwest of France for 12 microsatellite loci (A) and four SNP loci (B). Within sections panels represent: upper panel–variability measures, middle panel–deviations from neutral expectations, and lower panel–proportion of populations falling into particular Structure and NewHybrids categories. Green and yellow shadings indicate values falling into the lower and upper quartiles, respectively. For locality information see Fig. 1 and Table 1. For data per locus see Additional file 1: Appendix I. The unprocessed data are in Additional file 3: Appendix III and Additional file 4: Appendix IV
# Microsatellite loci are 1 - Bspi3.11, 2 - Bspi3.19, 3 - Bspi4.16, 4 - Bspi4.24, 5 - Bspi 4.25, 6 - Bspi4.28 and 7 - Bspi4.29
Fig. 3Genotype profile over 12 microsatellite markers (a) and four nDNA SNPs (b) in Bufo spinosus and B. bufo over a transect in northwestern France. The classifications are with Structure (Q-score, horizontal axis) and with NewHybrids (pp, posterior probability of falling in the pooled hybrid class, vertical axis). Data points represent individuals (solid round symbols) or population means (open round symbols). For locality information see Table 1
Fig. 4Geographical cline analysis for Bufo spinosus (left, with Qs-values close to unity at vertical axis) and B. bufo (right, with Qs-values close to zero at vertical axis) in a transect in northwestern France. Study populations are as in Table 1 and small solid dots are population averages. Clines were fitted to a) Structure Q-scores (with blue shading) and NewHybrids posterior probabilities for the species (grey shadings with the transition towards B. spinosus left and towards B. bufo right). Note that the graph to the right shows the central part of the transect in detail. Furthermore, b) the loading on the first PCA axis, based on the panel of 12 microsatellites, c) the B. spinosus frequency of the mtDNA marker, d, e) morphological identification probabilities (details see text) and f–i) the B. spinosus frequency of four SNP markers. The 95% credible cline regions are highlighted by grey shadings. The vertical blue line gives the position of population 10, at Beaulieu. Locality altitudes are plotted in red
Parameter estimates for the geographical clines shown in Fig. 4. The results for Structure and NewHybrids on the panel of microsatellites are taken as the reference. Significant differences with the 2log-likelihood unit support limits falling outside the range observed for the reference clines are shown in boldface type
| Model | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Character, unit | Type | Centre | Width |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Microsatellite reference clines | |||||||||
| Structure, Q | fixN | −1.0 (−1.0–0.7) | 30.3 (21.5–44.4) | 0.016 | 0.983 | ||||
| NewHybrids, posterior probability | |||||||||
|
| fixL | −1.0 (−1.0–−0.2) | 0.6 (0.0–1.3) | 0.000 | 0.007 | 0.000 | 0.990 | ||
|
| typR | 10.8 (8.4–20.0) | 12.2 (6.0–29.9) | 1.729 | 0.048 | 0 | 1 | ||
| Thresholds–min, max | −1.0, 20.0 | 0.0, 44.4 | |||||||
| Tested clines | |||||||||
| PCA on microsatellites, loading first axis | fixN | 4.6 (−1.0−15.7) |
| −1.301 | 1.156 | ||||
| mtDNA, haplotype frequency | typN | −1.0 (−1.0–2.4) | 43.5 (31.0–64.0) | 0 | 1 | ||||
| Parotoids, classification probability | fixN |
|
| 0.142 | 0.769 | ||||
| Metatarsal tubercle, idem | fixN |
|
| 0.060 | 0.865 | ||||
| BDNF, allele frequency | fixR | 3.8 (−0.9–18.6) |
| 0.505 | 0.274 | 0.023 | 1.000 | ||
| POMC, idem | optN |
|
| 0.187 | 0.951 | ||||
| RAG1, idem | typB | 4.0 (−0.7–9.1) | 35.7 (23.4–56.2) | 2.811 | 20.704 | 0.360 | 0.042 | 0 | 1 |
| RPL3, idem | fixR | −0.9 (−1.0–3.9) | 26.8 (23.0–49.1) | 1.064 | 0.507 | 0.050 | 1.000 | ||
For the chosen models p and p are fixed to 0 and 1 (typ models), or their empirical values (fix models), or p and p are fitted (opt model). Tail fitting encompassed right (R), left (L), none (N) or both fitted (B). Cline position is the centre of the contact zone and ca. equals the distance to Beaulieu (in km, population 10, see Table 1). Cline width (w) is calculated as 1/maximum slope. Two log-likelihood unit support limits are presented in parentheses. δ and τ are the shape parameters for the left and right tails, and p and p are the character states at either end of the transect