Literature DB >> 25425939

A database of life-history traits of European amphibians.

Audrey Trochet1, Sylvain Moulherat2, Olivier Calvez3, Virginie M Stevens3, Jean Clobert3, Dirk S Schmeller4.   

Abstract

In the current context of climate change and landscape fragmentation, efficient conservation strategies require the explicit consideration of life history traits. This is particularly true for amphibians, which are highly threatened worldwide, composed by more than 7400 species, which is constitute one of the most species-rich vertebrate groups. The collection of information on life history traits is difficult due to the ecology of species and remoteness of their habitats. It is therefore not surprising that our knowledge is limited, and missing information on certain life history traits are common for in this species group. We compiled data on amphibian life history traits from literature in an extensive database with morphological and behavioral traits, habitat preferences and movement abilities for 86 European amphibian species (50 Anuran and 36 Urodela species). When it were available, we reported data for males, females, juveniles and tadpoles. Our database may serve as an important starting point for further analyses regarding amphibian conservation.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Amphibians; Europe; life history traits

Year:  2014        PMID: 25425939      PMCID: PMC4237922          DOI: 10.3897/BDJ.2.e4123

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biodivers Data J        ISSN: 1314-2828


Introduction

Amphibians are ectotherms, and all aspects of their life history are strongly influenced by the external environment, including weather and climate. Amphibians are currently the most threatened taxonomic group worldwide (Temple and Cox 2009, IUCN 2011). The major threats acting on amphibian populations are habitat loss and habitat fragmentation, pollution, global change or disease exposure (Beebee and Griffith 2005, Blaustein and Kiesecker 2002, Houlahan et al. 2000, Stuart et al. 2004). Habitat fragmentation is actually recognized as the major treat of amphibian decline (Chanson et al. 2008, Marsh and Trenham 2001) by its strong impact on population functioning, in particular in amphibians. Indeed, habitat fragmentation can decrease the size of habitat patches, and also the distances between habitat patches (Fahrig 2003, Chanson et al. 2008, Reh and Seitz 1990). Consequently, this loss of connectivity should negatively affect population functioning, by limiting dispersal events between patches and by increasing inbreeding risk (Sjögren-Gulve 1994). The impact of global warming on amphibian populations has been reported several times (Beebee 2002, Blaustein et al. 2001, Blaustein and Kiesecker 2002, Corn 2003, Houlahan et al. 2000, Araujo et al. 2006, Alford et al. 2006). For example, the breeding phenology of anurans adapted to breeding in early spring might be shifted to even earlier breeding in recent years in response to warmer spring temperatures (Beebee 1995, Parmesan 2006, Klaus and Lougheed 2013). These responses may not be universal among amphibians and remain a matter of debate (Beebee 2002, Corn 2003, Reading 1998). It is undoubted that rising temperatures, changes in precipitation and UV-radiation are considered stressful and might be associated with disease outbreaks in amphibian populations (Blaustein and Kiesecker 2002, Kiesecker and Blaustein 1995, Walker et al. 2010). UV-B may, however, also enhance tadpole growth in some species (Pahkala et al. 2003), but with not yet anticipated effects on survival of metamorphs and population dynamics. Our database on life history traits of 86 European Amphibian species is an important prerequisite for understanding change in amphibian life history, community composition and migration behavior. Such data is important to inform the Essential Biodiversity Variables (Pereira et al. 2013), develop new indicators and ultimately inform the decision-making process to improve amphibian conservation.

General description

Purpose

Our database summarizes life history traits, including morphology, reproductive strategies, movement abilities, habitat preferences, distribution and IUCN status for all European amphibian species (N=86), all in all 44 traits subdivided into 253 modalities. Our database comprises information from 304 scientific publications assembled by searching Web of Science®, Amphibiaweb (AmphibiaWeb 2012) and herpetological books. The IUCN status, from 1 (least concern) to 6 (extinct in the wild), and their population trends (-1: decreasing, 0: stable or +1: increasing) were extracted from the IUCN red list website (IUCN 2011). In total, we were able to compile data for 50 Anurans and 36 (Fig. 1). When several values were available for a continuous trait, we averaged them across studies (i.e. between populations). When they are available, data for males, females, juveniles (larvae) and tadpoles were reported. Summary of mean data, range and missing values are given in Table 2.
Figure 1.

Proportion of (a) (N=50) and (b) species (N=36) within IUCN categories used in our database. Data were extracted in 2013 from information found on the IUCN website (IUCN 2011). IUCN categories: LC = least concern, NT = near threatened, VU = vulnerable, EN = endangered, CR = critically endangered.

Table 2.

Mean and range (min-max) of several traits recorded in and species from our database. Number of missing values is also reported.

Anura (N=50)Urodela (N=36)
MeanRange(min–max)Number of missing valuesMeanRange(min–max)Number of missing values
Body mass (in g)32.342.31–307.23196.680.98–35.2310
Snout-to-vent length in adults (in mm)61.8935.18–141.00063.6433.31–169.904
Snout-to-vent length in males (in mm)56.0134.70–134.74959.1931–129.757
Snout-to-vent length in females (in mm)62.1435.65–150.001061.7238.12–155.257
Total length in adults (in mm)61.8935.18–141.000126.1567.28–257.001
Foot length (in mm)27.735.37–65.95257.566.50–9.0931
Tibia length (in mm)26.8913.15–56.811918.884.81–32.9434
Hind limb length (in mm)90.4045.28–188.982519.7110.68–41.008
Metamorphosis size (in mm)20.839.50–95.001438.7620.00–70.005
Number of eggs4875.7020–250000164.062–14000
Survival rates in adults0.640.34–0.80440.630.42–0.7927
Sexual maturity (in years)2.181–4123.351.5–78
Movement ability (in m)5422.73150–1500026481.0821–150023
Because habitat fragmentation is currently the most threat affecting amphibian populations, movement specific data could help for conservation plans. By this way, we first selected traits related to movement abilities. Then, the costs associated with movements, and particularly with dispersal, might constrain the allocation of resources among all components of an individual’s life, and could lead to relationships between movement abilities and several other traits. Indeed, and compared to relationships found between movement and life history traits in other groups (in mammals and birds: Bowman 2003, Bowman et al. 2002, Sutherland et al. 2000), we then reported traits that could be related to movement abilities, always in order to help for amphibian management.

Geographic coverage

Description

Our database included all amphibian species present in Europe (Frost et al. 2006, IUCN 2011). Four invasive species were included in the database (, , and ). A particularity is that has been recently split in several species. To avoid biased data, we considered all populations to represent identical entities and therefore argued that they shared identical traits. By this way, we reported only traits referring to (formerly ) and we did not take into account traits related to new splited species.

Taxonomic coverage

We based our taxonomic coverage on European species described on the IUCN website (IUCN 2011) and from the Amphibian Tree of Life (Frost et al. 2006). More details on species are given in Table 1.
Table 1.

Details on species used in our database. For each species, synonyms and family were given. Information about spatial distribution (if the species is an invasive species or not, and if it lives out of Europe) was reported. List of references associated (Suppl. material 2), number of publications used and the percent of missing values for each species were also given.

Anurans/ UrodelaSpeciesSynonymsFamilyInvasive Species (Yes/No)Species living out of EuropeReferencesNumber of publications used% of missing values
A Alytes cisternasii - Discoglossidae NoNo1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7711.46
A Alytes dickhilleni - Discoglossidae NoNo4, 8226.09
A Alytes muletensis - Discoglossidae NoNo4, 7, 9321.34
A Alytes obstetricans - Discoglossidae NoNo2, 3, 5, 6, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17125.14
A Anaxyrus americanus Bufo americanus Bufonidae YesYes7, 137, 228, 229413.83
U Atylodes genei - Plethodontidae NoNo4, 138, 139, 140, 141, 142622.53
A Bombina bombina - Bombinatoridae NoYes4, 6, 18, 19, 20, 2163.56
A Bombina pachypus - Bombinatoridae NoNo6, 19250.59
A Bombina variegata - Bombinatoridae NoNo4, 11, 13, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33167.11
A Bufo bufo - Bufonidae NoYes4, 5, 6, 11, 13, 14, 15, 19, 26, 30, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 48, 49, 50241.98
A Bufo mauritanicus - Bufonidae NoYes12, 48230.83
U Calotriton arnoldi - Salamandridae NoNo139, 142, 143354.15
U Calotriton asper Euproctus asper Salamandridae NoNo4, 11, 13, 139, 140, 141, 144, 145, 146, 147, 148, 149, 150, 151147.91
U Chioglossa lusitanica - Salamandridae NoNo4, 139, 140, 141, 152, 156, 157, 158810.28
A Discoglossus galganoi Discoglossus hispanicus Discoglossidae NoNo4, 7, 49315.81
A Discoglossus jeanneae - Discoglossidae NoNo4, 50, 51324.11
A Discoglossus montalentii - Discoglossidae NoNo11, 52222.92
A Discoglossus pictus - Discoglossidae NoYes4, 6, 11, 53, 54, 55613.44
A Discoglossus sardus - Discoglossidae NoNo4, 11, 52, 56, 57518.97
A Epidalea calamita Bufo calamita Bufonidae NoYes4, 11, 13, 15, 25, 26, 56, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 66141.19
U Euproctus montanus - Salamandridae NoNo4, 7, 139, 141, 157517.79
U Euproctus platycephalus - Salamandridae NoNo4, 139, 141, 157, 158513.44
A Hyla arborea - Hylidae NoYes4, 5, 11, 13, 15, 58, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70, 71, 72, 73142.37
A Hyla intermedia Hyla italica Hylidae NoNo4, 57, 58, 67, 74539.13
A Hyla meridionalis - Hylidae NoYes7, 11, 12, 13, 58, 7569.88
A Hyla sarda - Hylidae NoNo11, 26, 57, 67413.04
U Lissotriton boscai Triturus boscai Salamandridae NoNo4, 139, 140, 141, 159, 161, 162, 163, 164915.02
U Lissotriton helveticus Triturus helveticus Salamandridae NoNo4, 11, 13, 15, 26, 59, 139, 140, 141, 150, 163, 164, 165, 166147.91
U Lissotriton italicus Triturus italicus Salamandridae NoNo4, 139, 159, 167418.18
U Lissotriton montandoni Triturus montandoni Salamandridae NoNo4, 139, 140, 141, 159, 168, 169718.18
U Lissotriton vulgaris Triturus vulgaris Salamandridae NoYes4, 11, 14, 15, 18, 19, 26, 44, 59, 139, 140, 141, 150, 164, 169, 172, 173, 174, 175, 176, 177, 178, 179, 180, 181, 182, 183, 184285.53
A Lithobates catesbeianus Rana catesbeiana Ranidae YesYes4, 5, 11, 13, 15, 26, 76, 77, 78, 79, 80, 81124.35
A Lithobates sylvaticus Rana sylvatica Ranidae YesYes5, 7, 230, 231, 232513.44
U Lyciasalamandra helverseni Mertensiella luschani helverseni Salamandridae NoNo139, 182249.80
U Lyciasalamandra luschani Mertensiella luschani Salamandridae NoYes4, 140, 184, 185, 186, 187614.62
U Mesotriton alpestris Triturus alpestris, Ichthyosaura alpestris Salamandridae NoNo4, 11, 14, 15, 19, 26, 59, 140, 141, 142, 151, 164, 165, 176, 188, 189, 190, 191, 192196.72
A Pelobates cultripes - Pelobatidae NoNo4, 6, 11, 13, 56, 82, 83711.46
A Pelobates fuscus - Pelobatidae NoYes4, 5, 6, 11, 19, 26, 84, 85, 86, 87105.14
A Pelobates syriacus Pelobates transcaucasicus Pelobatidae NoYes4117.00
A Pelodytes ibericus - Pelodytidae NoNo4, 88, 89317.79
A Pelodytes punctatus - Pelodytidae NoNo4, 11, 13, 15, 58, 89613.04
A Pelophylax bedriagae Rana bedriagae Ranidae NoYes4, 90223.32
A Pelophylax bergeri Rana bergeri Ranidae NoNo4122.13
A Pelophylax cerigensis Rana cerigensis Ranidae NoNo4, 91231.23
A Pelophylax cretensis Rana cretensis Ranidae NoNo4, 92231.23
A Pelophylax epeiroticus Rana epeirotica Ranidae NoNo4, 93, 94, 95, 96524.51
A Pelophylax esculentus Rana esculenta Ranidae NoYes4, 6, 14, 15, 18, 97, 98, 99, 100, 101, 102115.14
A Pelophylax grafi Rana grafi Ranidae NoNo4, 26, 97323.72
A Pelophylax hispanicus Rana hispanica Ranidae NoNo4, 51251.78
A Pelophylax kurtmuelleri Rana kurtmuelleri Ranidae NoNo4, 51228.85
A Pelophylax lessonae Rana lessonae Ranidae NoYes4, 6, 14, 15, 26, 97, 98, 99, 100, 101, 103, 104, 105134.35
A Pelophylax perezi Rana perezi Ranidae NoNo4, 5, 26, 97, 106515.81
A Pelophylax ridibundus Rana ridibunda Ranidae NoYes4, 14, 15, 58, 97, 99, 100, 102, 107, 108, 109, 110, 111, 112143.95
A Pelophylax shqipericus Rana shqiperica Ranidae NoNo4, 113234.78
U Pleurodeles waltl Salamandridae NoYes4, 7, 12, 140, 141, 142, 177, 193813.83
U Proteus anguinus Siren anguina Proteidae NoNo4, 140, 141, 142, 148, 149, 194714.23
A Pseudepidalea viridis Bufo viridis, Bufotes viridis Bufonidae NoYes4, 11, 12, 26, 30, 51, 58, 90, 115, 116, 117, 118, 119135.93
A Rana arvalis - Ranidae NoYes4, 11, 15, 19, 58, 12066.72
A Rana dalmatina Rana agilis Ranidae NoYes4, 11, 13, 15, 30, 46, 58, 121, 122, 123103.56
A Rana graeca - Ranidae NoNo4, 58212.65
A Rana iberica - Ranidae NoNo4, 5, 58, 123412.25
A Rana italica - Ranidae NoNo4, 51223.72
A Rana latastei - Ranidae NoNo4, 58, 124, 125415.02
A Rana pyrenaica - Ranidae NoNo4, 11, 13, 26, 126, 127617.39
A Rana temporaria - Ranidae NoYes4, 5, 11, 13, 14, 15, 19, 26, 44, 58, 120, 121, 126, 128, 129, 130, 131, 132, 133192.37
U Salamandra algira - Salamandridae NoYes12, 140232.02
U Salamandra atra - Salamandridae NoNo4, 11, 140, 141, 142, 151, 195, 196818.58
U Salamandra corsica - Salamandridae NoNo26, 140, 197322.92
U Salamandra lanzai - Salamandridae NoNo11, 26, 140, 198, 199, 200617.79
U Salamandra salamandra - Salamandridae NoNo11, 13, 14, 15, 19, 140, 141, 142, 151, 200, 201, 202, 203, 204, 205159.88
U Salamandrina perspicillata - Salamandridae NoNo140, 142, 206, 207, 208, 209658.89
U Salamandrina terdigitata Molge tridactyla Salamandridae NoNo4, 140, 141, 208424.51
U Speleomantes ambrosii - Plethodontidae NoNo4, 139, 140314.62
U Speleomantes flavus - Plethodontidae NoNo4, 139, 140339.13
U Speleomantes imperialis - Plethodontidae NoNo4, 139, 140317.00
U Speleomantes italicus - Plethodontidae NoNo4, 139, 140, 141416.21
U Speleomantes sarrabusensis - Plethodontidae NoNo4144.27
U Speleomantes strinatii - Plethodontidae NoNo4, 11, 26, 140, 211515.02
U Speleomantes supramontis - Plethodontidae NoNo4, 139, 140339.13
U Triturus carnifex - Salamandridae NoNo4, 18, 36, 140, 160, 176, 197, 212, 213, 214108.70
U Triturus cristatus - Salamandridae NoYes4, 11, 15, 18, 19, 26, 44, 56, 59, 140, 141, 142, 151, 160, 165, 173, 174, 175, 176, 177, 181, 215, 216, 217, 218, 219264.35
U Triturus dobrogicus - Salamandridae NoNo4, 18, 85, 140, 160, 176, 177, 220826.09
U Triturus karelinii - Salamandridae NoYes4, 140, 142, 160, 176, 177, 221, 222, 223940.71
U Triturus marmoratus - Salamandridae NoNo4, 11, 13, 18, 26, 56, 140, 142, 160, 164, 215, 216, 217, 224, 2251510.67
U Triturus pygmaeus - Salamandridae NoNo4, 140, 141, 160, 224, 226, 227718.18
A Xenopus laevis Bufo laevis Pipidae YesYes5, 11, 26, 134, 135, 136611.86

Traits coverage

Morphological traits

We reported 14 morphological traits (32 modalities) for each European amphibian species: body lengths, body mass, limb lengths and details about webbing and fingers (Table 3). These traits were supposed to be relevant for amphibian conservation.
Table 3.

Definition of the 14 morphological traits and their modalities in the European amphibian database. For all traits recorded, DD (data deficient) means that no data were reported. When several values were available for a trait, we averaged them across studies (i.e. between populations).

Sexual dimorphism Difference in ornamentation (coloration) or in size (length of tail, size of head or body size) between sexes. In amphibians, females are generally bigger than males. This difference may be caused by natural selection of a large female size due to a fecundity advantage. This phenotypic difference in size is often explained by sexual selection.
Modalities:
0Absence of sexual dimorphism.
1Presence of sexual dimorphism.
Body mass Body mass in males, females or both when sex specific data were not available.
Modalities:
Body mass in malesBody mass in males, in grams.
Body mass in femalesBody mass in males, in grams.
Adult body massBody mass in adults, without distinction between males and females, in grams. This data was recorded when no sex specific data on body mass were available in the literature.
Body mass in juvenilesBody mass in juveniles, in grams. No distinction between sexes was available.
Body length A measurement of the longest dimension of a body, typically between two distinct ends of the body. In amphibians, the distance snout-to-vent length is usually measured. To take into account the tail length in Urodela, we also reported a total length for each species, in males, in females or both when sex-specific data were not available.
Snout-to-vent length
Modalities:
Snout-to-vent length in malesMeasurement between the snout and the vent in males (in millimeters).
Snout-to-vent length in femalesMeasurement between the snout and the vent in females (in millimeters).
Adult snout-to-vent lengthMeasurement between the snout and the vent in adults, when no sex specific data were available (in millimeters).
Total length In Anura, this measure was similar to the snout-to-vent length. In Urodela, this measurement takes into account the tail length.
Modalities:
Total length in malesMeasure of the total body length in males, in millimeters.
Total length in femalesMeasure of the total body length in females, in millimeters.
Adult total lengthMeasure of the total body length in adults, when no sex specific data were available, in millimeters.
Head and body length proportion Proportion of the head length compared to the body length.
Modalities:
Head length < Body length0: Head length is not lower than body length.1: Head length is lower than body length.
Head length = Body length0: Head length is not similar to body length.1: Head length is similar to body length.
Head length > Body length0: Head length is not longer than body length.1: Head length is longer than body length.
Limb length Measurements of limb (foot, tibia and hind limb) in males, in females, or both when data were not sex specific available.
Foot length Measurement of the foot in millimeters.
Modalities:
Foot length in malesMeasurement of the foot in males, in millimeters.
Foot length in femalesMeasurement of the foot in females, in millimeters.
Adult foot lengthMeasurement of the foot in adults, when no sex specific data were available, in millimeters.
Hind limb length Measurement of the hind limb, in millimeters.
Modalities:
Hind limb length in malesMeasurement of the hind limb in males, in millimeters.
Hind limb length in femalesMeasurement of the hind limb in females, in millimeters.
Adult hind limb lengthMeasurement of the hind limb in adults, when no sex specific data were available, in millimeters.
Tibia length Measurement of the tibia, in millimeters.
Modalities:
Tibia length in malesMeasurement of the tibia in males, in millimeters.
Tibia length in femalesMeasurement of the tibia in females, in millimeters.
Adult tibia lengthMeasurement of the tibia in adults, when no sex specific data were available, in millimeters.
Fore and hind limb proportion Proportion of the fore limb length compared to the hind limb length.
Modalities:
Fore limb length < Hind limb length0: Fore limb length is not lower than hind limb length.1: Fore limb length is lower than hind limb length.
Fore limb length = Hind limb length0: Fore limb length is not similar to hind limb length.1: Fore limb length is similar to hind limb length.
Fore limb length > Hind limb length0: Fore limb length is not longer than hind limb length.1: Fore limb length is longer than hind limb length.
Fingers and webbing
Presence of discs Some amphibians have adhesive discs at the ends of the toes and fingers.
Modalities:
0Absence of adhesive discs
1Presence of adhesive discs on fingers and/or on toes.
Webbing
Modalities:
Presence of webbing0: Absence of webbing.1: Presence of webbing on toes and/or fingers
Presence of webbing on toes only0: Absence of webbing on toes only.1: Presence of webbing on toes only.
Presence of webbing on toes and fingers0: Absence of webbing on toes and fingers.1: Presence of webbing on toes and fingers.
Number of toes/fingers Most of amphibians have 5 toes on their feet and 4 fingers on their hands. But some of them can have less than 5 toes and/or 4 fingers. We reported if each species have a reduction only on fingers (4), or if the individuals have less than 5 toes and 4 fingers.
Modalities:
Reduction on fingers only0: Individuals have less than 5 toes and 4 fingers.1: Individuals have 5 toes and 4 fingers.
Reduction on fingers and toes0: Individuals have 5 toes and 4 fingers.1: Individuals have less than 5 toes and 4 fingers.
Presence of metatarsal tubercle Some species have a metatarsal tubercle on hind limb. A prominent inner metatarsal tubercle used for burrowing with the hind limbs. When available, the length of the tubercle is given.
Modalities:
0Absence of metatarsal tubercle.
1Presence of metatarsal tubercle.
Coloration
Modalities:
Dorsoseparation0: Dorsoseparation weak1: Dorsoseparation sharp
Webbing colour contrast0: Absence of webbing colour contrast1: Presence of webbing colour contrast

Life history traits

We collected 17 life history traits (65 modalities), when available, for European amphibians (Table 4). Life history traits vary considerably between species, and between and in particular. The database includes data about activity, survival rates, sexual maturity, mating systems, characteristics of eggs and clutch position, parental care, foot diet, defense system, communication and territoriality.
Table 4.

Definition of the 17 life history traits and their modalities in the European amphibian database. For all traits recorded, DD (data deficient) means that none data were reported in the literature. When several values were available for a trait, we averaged them across studies (i.e. between populations).

Activity Details about the period of activity.
Modalities:
Diurnal0: No diurnal species.1: Diurnal species.
Nocturnal0: No nocturnal species.1: Nocturnal species.
Both0: Species diurnal or nocturnal.1: Species diurnal and nocturnal.
Survival rates Survival rate indicates the percentage of individuals who are alive for a given period of time.
Modalities:
Survival rates in malesSurvival rates in males.
Survival rates in femalesSurvival rates in females.
Adult survival ratesSurvival rates in adults, when no sex specific data were available.
Sexual maturity Sexual maturity in years.
Modalities:
Sexual maturity in malesSexual maturity in males, in years.
Sexual maturity in femalesSexual maturity in females, in years.
Adult sexual maturitySexual maturity in adults, when no sex specific data were available, in years.
Mating systems Structuration of sexual behaviour relationships during the breeding season. We recorded 2 different types of mating systems through amphibians: polygyny when a male has mating relationships with several females; polyandry when a female has mating relationships with several males.
Modalities:
Polyandry0: No polyandry species.1: Polyandry species
Polygyny0: No polygyny species.1: Polygyny species.
Eggs and young Details about clutch size, egg laying mode, eggs and young characteristics.
Number of eggs/offspring
Modalities:
Viviparous: number of offspringWhen the species is viviparous, number of offspring by female by clutch.
Ovoviviparous: number of eggsWhen the species is ovoviviparous, number of eggs by female by clutch.
Ovoviviparous: number of offspringWhen the species is ovoviviparous, number of offspring by female by clutch.
Egg laying mode
Modalities:
Single0: Eggs are not laid single.1: Eggs are laid single.
Cluster0: Eggs are not laid by cluster.1: Eggs are laid by cluster.
Strings0: Eggs are not laid by strings.1: Eggs are laid by strings.
Eggs and larvae characteristics
Modalities:
Metamorphosis sizeMeasurement of the total body length of juveniles before metamorphosis, in millimeters.
Number of eggsWhen the species is oviparous, number of eggs by female by clutch.
Egg diameterEgg diameter in millimeters.
Egg massEgg mass in grams.
Pole visible on eggs0: Pole not visible on eggs.1: Pole visible on eggs.
Clutch position Eggs can be lay at different places in the breeding environment.
Modalities:
On ground0: Eggs are not laid on ground.1: Eggs are laid on ground.
On adult0: Eggs are not laid on adult.1: Eggs are laid on adult.
Attach in lotic habitat0: Eggs are not attached in lotic habitat.1: Eggs are attached in lotic habitat.
Attach in lentic habitat0: Eggs are not attached in lentic habitat.1: Eggs are attached in lentic habitat.
Free in lentic habitat0: Eggs are not laid free in lentic habitat.1: Eggs are laid free in lentic habitat.
On surface in lentic habitat0: Eggs are not laid on surface in lentic habitat.1: Eggs are laid on surface in lentic habitat.
Attach on swamps in lentic habitat0: Eggs are not attached on swamps in lentic habitat.1: Eggs are attached on swamps in lentic habitat.
Free on swamps in lentic habitat0: Eggs are not laid free on swamps in lentic habitat.1: Eggs are laid free on swamps in lentic habitat.
On surface on swamps in lentic habitat0: Eggs are not laid on surface on swamps in lentic habitat.1: Eggs are laid on surface on swamps in lentic habitat.
On surface on non-permanent lentic ponds0: Eggs are not laid on surface on non-permanent lentic ponds.1: Eggs are laid on surface on non-permanent lentic ponds.
Breeding season Breeding season can be prolonged or explosive (breeding periods of a few days to a few weeks).
Modalities:
Explosive or prolonged0: Prolonged breeding season.1: Explosive breeding season.
Parental care Parental care is defined as any behaviour of parents for increasing the fitness of their young. Most of amphibians do not perform parental care, but a few transport, guard and defend their eggs.
Modalities:
Presence of parental care0: Absence of parental care.1: Presence of parental care.
Transport of eggs0: Parents do not transport their eggs.1: Parents transport their eggs.
Transport of tadpoles0: Parents do not transport their tadpoles.1: Parents transport their tadpoles.
Guarding eggs0: Parents do not guard their eggs.1: Parents guard their eggs.
Defend eggs0: Parents do not defend their eggs.1: Parents defend their eggs.
Water eggs0: Parents do not humidify their eggs.1: Parents humidify their eggs.
Food diet
Food active or passive
Modalities:
0Food passive (sit-and-wait)
1Food active (active foragers)
Food of juveniles
Modalities:
Carnivorous0: Juveniles are not carnivorous.1: Juveniles are carnivorous.
Insectivorous0: Juveniles are not insectivorous.1: Juveniles are insectivorous.
Moluscivorous0: Juveniles are not moluscivorous.1: Juveniles are moluscivorous.
Cannibalism0: Juveniles are not cannibals.1: Juveniles are cannibals.
Herbivorous0: Juveniles are not herbivorous.1: Juveniles are herbivorous.
Detritivorous0: Juveniles are not detritivorous.1: Juveniles are detritivorous.
Food of adults
Modalities:
Carnivorous0: Adults are not carnivorous.1: Juveniles are carnivorous.
Insectivorous0: Juveniles are not insectivorous.1: Juveniles are insectivorous.
Moluscivorous0: Juveniles are not moluscivorous.1: Juveniles are moluscivorous.
Cannibalism0: Juveniles are not cannibals.1: Juveniles are cannibals.
Herbivorous0: Juveniles are not herbivorous.1: Juveniles are herbivorous.
Detritivorous0: Juveniles are not detritivorous.1: Juveniles are detritivorous.
Metabolism
Modalities:
Metabolism ratesMetabolism rate in adults.
Defense Mode of defense
Modalities:
Secretion0: Species do not use secretion as mode of defense.1: Species uses secretion as mode of defense.
Toxicity0: Species do not use toxicity as mode of defense.1: Species uses toxicity as mode of defense.
Death simulation0: Species do not use death simulation as mode of defense.1: Species uses death simulation as mode of defense.
Unken reflex0: Species do not use unken reflex as mode of defense.1: Species uses unken reflex as mode of defense.
Other0: Species do not use other mode of defense.1: Species uses other mode of defense.
Communication Mode of communication
Modalities:
Visual0: Species do not use visual communication.1: Species uses visual communication.
Acoustic0: Species do not use acoustic communication.1: Species uses acoustic communication.
Chemical0: Species do not use chemical communication.1: Species uses chemical communication.
Seismic0: Species do not use seismic communication.1: Species uses seismic communication.
Territoriality Territoriality can serve individuals to defend their nest, den, sexual partners, mating sites or high quality resources sites needed for themselves or their young. We recorded species for which individuals develop a territorial behaviour (by scent markings or fighting) during the breeding season.
Modalities:
Male territorial0: No.1: Yes.
Female territorial0: No.1: Yes.
Both territorial0: Both males and females not territorial.1: Both males and females territorial.

Movement

We reported 7 traits related to movement, by separating when possible migration (N subcategories) and dispersal events (21 modalities; Table 5). In contrast to migration, dispersal is defined as individual movement that induces gene flow (Ronce 2007). Amphibians regularly migrate between terrestrial and aquatic habitats, and some individuals also engage in dispersal, leaving their population of birth (or previous reproduction) to join another suitable habitat in the landscape. We used the maximum distance (and not the modal distance) recorded by species because long-distance dispersal movements have considerably higher impact on species spread, species persistence, and metapopulation functioning (Trakhtenbrot et al. 2005). All dispersal and migration values were estimated using mark-release-recapture or individual tracking. In general, amphibians are considered as low dispersal species (Boissinot 2009, Smith and Green 2005), but we detected several species for which dispersal and/or migration distances were > 10 km (Fig. 2).
Table 5.

Definition of the 7 traits related to movement in the European amphibian database. For all traits recorded, DD (data deficient) means that no data were reported in the literature. When several values were available for a trait, we averaged them across studies (i.e. between populations).

Home range
Modalities:
Home rangeHere, we consider home range as the area that an individual needs throughout a year.Home range recorded in the literature, in m².
Movement event
Modalities:
Movement event0: Movement events performed by one single individual (solitary individual).1: Movement events performed by several individuals (social individuals).
Dispersal active or passive
Modalities:
Dispersal active or passive0: Passive dispersal.1: Active dispersal.
Sex-biased dispersal Dispersal abilities can be significantly different between genders. We reported here if sex-biased dispersal was identified in species (if males have faster or longer dispersal abilities than females).
Modalities:
Sex-biased dispersal0: No sex-biased dispersal reported in the literature.1: Significant sex-biased dispersal reported in the literature.
Mode of displacement
Modalities:
Walker0: Individuals do not walk during displacement event.1: Individuals walk during displacement event.
Jumper0: Individuals do not jump during displacement event.1: Individuals jump during displacement event.
Runner0: Individuals do not run during displacement event.1: Individuals run during displacement event.
Climber0: Individuals do not climb during displacement event.1: Individuals climb during displacement event.
Swimmer0: Individuals do not swim during displacement event.1: Individuals swim during displacement event.
Crawler0: Individuals do not crawl during displacement event.1: Individuals crawl during displacement event.
Dispersal Contrary to migration, dispersal is defined as individual movement could induce gene flow. Dispersal distances came from mark-release-recapture and/or radio-tracking studies.
Modalities:
Dispersal stage juvenile0: Dispersal event not at juvenile stage.1: Dispersal event at juvenile stage.
Dispersal stage adult0: Dispersal event not at adult stage.1: Dispersal event at adult stage.
Dispersal stage during breeding season0: Dispersal event not during breeding season.1: Dispersal event during breeding season.
Mean dispersal distanceMean dispersal distance, in meters.
Maximum dispersal distanceMaximum dispersal distance, in meters.
Minimal dispersal distanceMinimal dispersal distance, in meters.
Migration Contrary to dispersal, migration is defined as individual movement that not induces gene flow. Migration distances came from mark-release-recapture and/or radio-tracking studies.
Modalities:
Migration stage adult0: Migration event not at adult stage.1: Migration event at adult stage.
Migration stage during breeding season0: Migration event not during breeding season.1: Migration event during breeding season.
Mean migration distanceMean migration distance, in meters.
Maximum migration distanceMaximum migration distance, in meters.
Minimal migration distanceMinimal migration distance, in meters.
Figure 2.

Frequency histogram of the maximum distance moved by (a) 56 and (b) 30 species.

Habitat preferences and distribution

We collected habitat preferences and 2 traits related to spatial distribution (113 modalities; Table 6). Amphibians are often considered as specialized to certain habitat types, which make them particularly sensitive to landscape changes. Nevertheless, habitat preferences, and particularly terrestrial habitats of amphibian species request much clarification, especially given the recent changes induced by habitat fragmentation. We categorized habitats as follows (IUCN 2011): forest, savanna, shrubland, grassland, wetlands, rocky areas, caves and subterranean habitats (non-aquatic), deserts, artificial/terrestrial habitats, and other. We chose to use the following IUCN habitats because in our opinion it is the most conservative assumptions about species delimitations and also because these are the entities currently recognized by international conservation authorities and that is the actual aim of the database. Moreover, for this inter-specific database we avoided selecting too specific habitats, and chose relatively broad habitat categories which included all habitats in which species live. We also noted biogeographical regions (European Environment Agency 2010) where species were present, and the proportion of their distribution map on each continent.
Table 6.

Definition of the habitat preferences and the 2 traits related to the spatial distribution in the European amphibian database (IUCN 2011). For all traits recorded, DD (data deficient) means that no data were reported in the literature.

Habitat Habitat(s) where the species is frequently found.
Modalities:
Forest
Boreal0: The species does not live in boreal forests.1: The species lives in boreal forests.
Subarctic0: The species does not live in subarctic forests.1: The species lives in subarctic forests.
Subantarctic0: The species does not live in subantarctic forests.1: The species lives in subantarctic forests.
Subtropical/tropical dry0: The species does not live in subtropical/tropical dry forests.1: The species lives in subtropical/tropical dry forests.
Temperate0: The species does not live in temperate forests.1: The species lives in temperate forests.
Subtropical/tropical moist lowland0: The species does not live in subtropical/tropical moist lowland forests.1: The species lives in subtropical/tropical moist lowland forests.
Subtropical/tropical mangrove vegetation aboral0: The species does not live in subtropical/tropical mangrove vegetation aboral forests.1: The species lives in subtropical/tropical mangrove vegetation aboral forests.
Subtropical/tropical swamp0: The species does not live in subtropical/tropical swamp forests.1: The species lives in subtropical/tropical swamp forests.
Subtropical/tropical moist montane0: The species does not live in subtropical/tropical moist montane forests.1: The species lives in subtropical/tropical moist montane forests.
Savanna
Dry0: The species does not live in dry savanna.1: The species lives in dry savanna.
Moist0: The species does not live in moist savanna.1: The species lives in moist savanna.
Shrubland
Subarctic0: The species does not live in subarctic shrubland.1: The species lives in subarctic shrubland.
Subantarctic0: The species does not live in subantarctic shrubland.1: The species lives in subantarctic shrubland.
Boreal0: The species does not live in boreal shrubland.1: The species lives in boreal shrubland.
Temperate0: The species does not live in temperate shrubland.1: The species lives in temperate shrubland.
Subtropical/tropical dry0: The species does not live in subtropical/tropical dry shrubland.1: The species lives in subtropical/tropical dry shrubland.
Subtropical/tropical moist0: The species does not live in subtropical/tropical moist shrubland.1: The species lives in subtropical/tropical moist shrubland.
Tropical high altitude0: The species does not live in tropical high altitude shrubland.1: The species lives in tropical high altitude shrubland.
Mediterranean-type shrubby vegetation0: The species does not live in mediterranean-type shrubby vegetation shrubland.1: The species lives in mediterranean-type shrubby vegetation shrubland.
Grassland
Tundra0: The species does not live in tundra grassland.1: The species lives in tropical tundra grassland.
Subarctic0: The species does not live in subarctic grassland.1: The species lives in tropical subarctic grassland.
Subantarctic0: The species does not live in subantarctic grassland.1: The species lives in tropical subantarctic grassland.
Temperate0: The species does not live in temperate grassland.1: The species lives in tropical temperate grassland.
Subtropical/tropical dry0: The species does not live in subtropical/tropical dry grassland.1: The species lives in tropical subtropical/tropical dry grassland.
Subtropical/tropical seasonally wet/ flooded0: The species does not live in subtropical/tropical seasonally wet/ flooded grassland.1: The species lives in tropical subtropical/tropical seasonally wet/ flooded grassland.
Subtropical/tropical high altitude0: The species does not live in subtropical/ tropical high altitude grassland.1: The species lives in tropical subtropical/ tropical high altitude grassland.
Wetlands
Permanent rivers/streams/creeks (including waterfalls)0: The species does not live in permanent rivers/streams/creeks (including waterfalls) wetlands.1: The species lives in tropical permanent rivers/streams/creeks (including waterfalls) wetlands.
Intermittent/irregular rivers/streams/creeks0: The species does not live in intermittent/irregular rivers/streams/creeks wetlands.1: The species lives in tropical intermittent/irregular rivers/streams/creeks wetlands.
Shrub dominated wetlands0: The species does not live in shrub dominated wetlands wetlands.1: The species lives in tropical shrub dominated wetlands wetlands.
Bogs/marshes/swamps/fens/peatlands0: The species does not live in bogs/marshes/swamps/fens/peatlands wetlands.1: The species lives in tropical bogs/marshes/swamps/fens/peatlands wetlands.
Permanent freshwater lakes (>8ha)0: The species does not live in permanent freshwater lakes (>8ha) wetlands.1: The species lives in tropical permanent freshwater lakes (>8ha) wetlands.
Seasonal/intermittent freshwater lakes (>8ha)0: The species does not live in seasonal/intermittent freshwater lakes (>8ha) wetlands.1: The species lives in tropical seasonal/intermittent freshwater lakes (>8ha) wetlands.
Permanent freshwater marshes/pools (>8ha)0: The species does not live in permanent freshwater marshes/pools (>8ha) wetlands.1: The species lives in tropical permanent freshwater marshes/pools (>8ha) wetlands.
Seasonal/intermittent freshwater marshes/pools (<8ha)0: The species does not live in seasonal/intermittent freshwater marshes/pools (<8ha) wetlands.1: The species lives in tropical seasonal/intermittent freshwater marshes/pools (<8ha) wetlands.
Freshwater springs and oases0: The species does not live in freshwater springs and oases wetlands.1: The species lives in tropical freshwater springs and oases wetlands.
Tundra wetlands0: The species does not live in tundra wetlands wetlands.1: The species lives in tropical tundra wetlands wetlands.
Geothermal wetlands0: The species does not live in geothermal wetlands wetlands.1: The species lives in tropical geothermal wetlands wetlands.
Permanent inland deltas0: The species does not live in permanent inland deltas wetlands.1: The species lives in tropical permanent inland deltas wetlands.
Permanent saline, brackish or alkaline lakes0: The species does not live in permanent saline, brackish or alkaline lakes wetlands.1: The species lives in tropical permanent saline, brackish or alkaline lakes wetlands.
Seasonal/intermittent saline, brackish or alkaline lakes0: The species does not live in seasonal/intermittent saline, brackish or alkaline lakes wetlands.1: The species lives in tropical seasonal/intermittent saline, brackish or alkaline lakes wetlands.
Permanent saline, brackish or alkaline marshes/pools0: The species does not live in permanent saline, brackish or alkaline marshes/pools wetlands.1: The species lives in tropical permanent saline, brackish or alkaline marshes/pools wetlands.
Karst and other subterranean hydrological systems0: The species does not live in karst and other subterranean hydrological systems wetlands.1: The species lives in tropical karst and other subterranean hydrological systems wetlands.
Rocky areas
Inland cliffs, moutain peaks0: The species does not live in rock areas as inland cliffs, moutain peaks.1: The species lives in rock areas as inland cliffs, moutain peaks.
Caves and subterranean habitats (non-aquatic)
caves0: The species does not live in caves and subterranean habitats.1: The species lives in caves and subterranean habitats.
other subterranean habitats0: The species does not live in other subterranean habitats.1: The species lives in other subterranean habitats.
Deserts
Hot0: The species does not live in hot deserts.1: The species lives in other hot deserts.
Temperate0: The species does not live in temperate deserts.1: The species lives in other temperate deserts.
Cold0: The species does not live in cold deserts.1: The species lives in other cold deserts.
Artificial/terrestrial
Arable land0: The species does not live in arable land.1: The species lives in arable land.
Pastureland0: The species does not live in pastureland.1: The species lives in pastureland.
Plantations0: The species does not live in plantations.1: The species lives in plantations.
Rural gardens0: The species does not live in rural gardens.1: The species lives in rural gardens.
Urban areas0: The species does not live in urban areas.1: The species lives in urban areas.
Subtropical/tropical heavily degraded former forest0: The species does not live in subtropical/tropical heavily degraded former forest.1: The species lives in subtropical/tropical heavily degraded former forest.
Other
Dunes0: The species does not live in dunes.1: The species lives in dunes.
Topography
Modalities:
Altitude minMinimal attitude where the species was observed.
Altitude maxMaximal attitude where the species was observed.
Biogeographical regions
Modalities:
Alpine0: The species does not live in the alpine biogeographical region.1: The species lives in the alpine biogeographical region.
Anatolian0: The species does not live in the anatolian biogeographical region.1: The species lives in the anatolian biogeographical region.
Arctic0: The species does not live in the arctic biogeographical region.1: The species lives in the arctic biogeographical region.
Atlantic0: The species does not live in the atlantic biogeographical region.1: The species lives in the atlantic biogeographical region.
Black Sea0: The species does not live in the black sea biogeographical region.1: The species lives in the black sea biogeographical region.
Boreal0: The species does not live in the boreal biogeographical region.1: The species lives in the boreal biogeographical region.
Continental0: The species does not live in the continentalbiogeographical region.1: The species lives in the continental biogeographical region.
Mediterranean0: The species does not live in the mediterranean biogeographical region.1: The species lives in the mediterranean biogeographical region.
Macaronesian0: The species does not live in the macaronesian biogeographical region.1: The species lives in the macaronesian biogeographical region.
Pannonian0: The species does not live in the pannonian biogeographical region.1: The species lives in the pannonian biogeographical region.
Steppic0: The species does not live in the steppic biogeographical region.1: The species lives in the steppic biogeographical region.
Distribution
Modalities:
Europe occupied UTM 50×50 km cells
AbsoluteSpatial distribution of the species in Europe, calculated with GIS tools, in km².
Asia Distribution of the species in Asia.
AbsoluteSpatial distribution of the species in Asia, calculated with GIS tools, in km².
Punctual0: The spatial distribution of the species is not rare.1: The spatial distribution of the species is rare.
< 10%0: Less than 10% of the spatial distribution of the species is not in Asia.1: Less than 10% of the spatial distribution of the species is in Asia.
10–20%0: Between 10 and 20% of the spatial distribution of the species are not in Asia.1: Between 10 and 20% of the spatial distribution of the species are in Asia.
20–30%0: Between 20 and 30% of the spatial distribution of the species are not in Asia.1: Between 20 and 30% of the spatial distribution of the species are in Asia.
30–40%0: Between 30 and 40% of the spatial distribution of the species are not in Asia.1: Between 30 and 40% of the spatial distribution of the species are in Asia.
40–50%0: Between 40 and 50% of the spatial distribution of the species are not in Asia.1: Between 40 and 50% of the spatial distribution of the species are in Asia.
50–60%0: Between 50 and 60% of the spatial distribution of the species are not in Asia.1: Between 50 and 60% of the spatial distribution of the species are in Asia.
60–70%0: Between 60 and 70% of the spatial distribution of the species are not in Asia.1: Between 60 and 70% of the spatial distribution of the species are in Asia.
70–80%0: Between 70 and 80% of the spatial distribution of the species are not in Asia.1: Between 70 and 80% of the spatial distribution of the species are in Asia.
80–90%0: Between 80 and 90% of the spatial distribution of the species are not in Asia.1: Between 80 and 90% of the spatial distribution of the species are in Asia.
> 90%0: Up to 90% of the spatial distribution of the species is not in Asia.1: Up to 90% of the spatial distribution of the species is in Asia.
Africa Distribution of the species in Africa.
AbsoluteSpatial distribution of the species in Africa, calculated with GIS tools, in km².
Punctual0: The spatial distribution of the species is not punctual.1: The spatial distribution of the species is punctual.
<15%0: Less than 15% of the spatial distribution of the species is not in Africa.1: Less than 15% of the spatial distribution of the species is in Africa.
15–30%0: Between 15 and 30% of the spatial distribution of the species are not in Africa.1: Between 15 and 30% of the spatial distribution of the species are in Africa.
30–45%0: Between 30 and 45% of the spatial distribution of the species are not in Africa.1: Between 30 and 45% of the spatial distribution of the species are in Africa.
45–60%0: Between 45 and 60% of the spatial distribution of the species are not in Africa.1: Between 45 and 60% of the spatial distribution of the species are in Africa.
60–75%0: Between 60 and 75% of the spatial distribution of the species are not in Africa.1: Between 60 and 75% of the spatial distribution of the species are in Africa.
75–90%0: Between 75 and 90% of the spatial distribution of the species are not in Africa.1: Between 75 and 90% of the spatial distribution of the species are in Africa.
>90%0: Up to 90% of the spatial distribution of the species is not in Africa.1: Up to 90% of the spatial distribution of the species is in Africa.
North America Distribution of the species in North America.
AbsoluteSpatial distribution of the species in North America, calculated with GIS tools, in km².
Punctual0: The spatial distribution of the species is not punctual.1: The spatial distribution of the species is punctual.
<20%0: Less than 20% of the spatial distribution of the species is not in North America.1: Less than 20% of the spatial distribution of the species is in North America.
20–40%0: Between 20 and 40% of the spatial distribution of the species are not in North America.1: Between 20 and 40% of the spatial distribution of the species are in North America.
40–60%0: Between 40 and 60% of the spatial distribution of the species are not in North America.1: Between 40 and 60% of the spatial distribution of the species are in North America.
60–80%0: Between 60 and 80% of the spatial distribution of the species are not in North America.1: Between 60 and 80% of the spatial distribution of the species are in North America.
>80%0: Up to 80% of the spatial distribution of the species is not in North America.1: Up to 80% of the spatial distribution of the species is in North America.
South America Distribution of the species in South America.
AbsoluteSpatial distribution of the species in South America, calculated with GIS tools, in km².
Punctual0: The spatial distribution of the species is not punctual.1: The spatial distribution of the species is punctual.
<25%0: Less than 25% of the spatial distribution of the species is not in South America.1: Less than 25% of the spatial distribution of the species is in South America.
25–50%0: Between 25 and 50% of the spatial distribution of the species are not in South America.1: Between 25 and 50% of the spatial distribution of the species are in South America.
50–75%0: Between 50 and 75% of the spatial distribution of the species are not in South America.1: Between 50 and 75% of the spatial distribution of the species are in South America.
>75%0: Up to 75% of the spatial distribution of the species is not in South America.1: Up to 75% of the spatial distribution of the species is in South America.
Australia Distribution of the species in Australia.
AbsoluteSpatial distribution of the species in Australia, calculated with GIS tools, in km².
Punctual0: The spatial distribution of the species is not punctual.1: The spatial distribution of the species is punctual.
<50%0: Less than 50% of the spatial distribution of the species is not in Australia.1: Less than 50% of the spatial distribution of the species is in Australia.
>50%0: Up to 50% of the spatial distribution of the species is not in Australia.1: Up to 50% of the spatial distribution of the species is in Australia.
Global Distribution
Modalities:
Ubiquity0: The species is not ubiquist.1: The species is ubiquist.
Subendemic0: The species is not subendemic.1: The species is subendemic.
Endemic0: The species is not endemic.1: The species is endemic.

Threats

We collected information on three categories (22 modalities; Table 7) related to threats of amphibian species: The IUCN status (6 subcategories), population trend (4 subcategories), and major threats (12 subcategories).
Table 7.

Definition of the 3 traits related to threats in the European amphibian database. For all traits recorded, DD (data deficient) means that no data were reported in the literature.

IUCN status IUCN threat status. Threatened species have one of the three following IUCN status: “vulnerable”, “endangered”, “critically endangered”.
Modalities:
Data Deficient0: Data sufficient for the species.1: Data deficient for the species.
Least Concern0: IUCN status for the species is not Least Concern.1: IUCN status for the species is Least Concern.
Near Threatened0: IUCN status for the species is not Near Threatened.1: IUCN status for the species is Near Threatened.
Vulnerable0: IUCN status for the species is not Vulnerable.1: IUCN status for the species is Vulnerable.
Endangered0: IUCN status for the species is not Endangered.1: IUCN status for the species is Endangered.
Critically Endangered0: IUCN status for the species is not Critically Endangered.1: IUCN status for the species is Critically Endangered.
Population trend Evolution of the population. Population trends vary between “decrease”, “stable” and “increase”.
Modalities:
Data Deficient0: Data sufficient for the species.1: Data deficient for the species.
Decrease0: Population trend for the species is not Decrease.1: Population trend for the species is Decrease.
Stable0: Population trend for the species is not Stable.1: Population trend for the species is Stable.
Increase0: Population trend for the species is not Increase.1: Population trend for the species is Increase.
Major Threats Major threats impacting the species.
Modalities:
Habitat loss0: Habitat loss does not affect the species.1: Habitat loss affects the species.
Invasive alien0: Invasive alien does not affect the species.1: Invasive alien affects the species.
Harvesting0: Harvesting does not affect the species.1: Harvesting affects the species.
Accidental0: Accidental does not affect the species.1: Accidental affects the species.
Persecution0: Persecution does not affect the species.1: Persecution affects the species.
Pollution0: Pollution does not affect the species.1: Pollution affects the species.
Climate change0: Climate change does not affect the species.1: Climate change affects the species.
Natural disasters0: Natural disasters do not affect the species.1: Natural disasters affect the species.
Change dynamics0: Change dynamics do not affect the species.1: Change dynamics affect the species.
Intrinsic factors0: Intrinsic factors do not affect the species.1: Intrinsic factors affect the species.
Human disturbance0: Human disturbance does not affect the species.1: Human disturbance affects the species.
Unknown0: Factors affecting the species are known.1: Factors affecting the species are unknown.

Usage rights

Use license

Creative Commons CCZero

Data resources

Data package title

European amphibians database

Number of data sets

1

Data set 1.

Data set name

Database fo life-history traits for European amphibians

Data format

xls

Number of columns

45

Description

Summary of morphometric and life-history traits for 86 European amphibian species (Suppl. material 1). Values expected for the life-histories have been averaged between studies (i.e. between populations). DD (data deficient) means that data were not available in the literature.

Additional information

Our database is the first comprehensive trait database in European amphibians. After an extensive research effort, our database highlighted the lack of data about amphibian traits and more generally, on amphibian’s biology. Improve our knowledge on amphibians should certainly help for their management, which might strongly enhance their conservation plans. Morphological traits, which are easy to collect, are still unavailable for many species. Data about movement abilities (both dispersal and migration) were the least informed data of all database. In particular, we showed that movement traits, which are difficult to collect, were unknown for a majority of threatened species. This database could be an essential support for management and conservation plans, and should be more efficient when all data will be available. Database for life history traits for European amphibians Data type: life history traits Brief description: Summary of morphometric and life-history traits for 86 European amphibian species. Values expected for the life-histories have been averaged between studies (i.e. between populations). NA means that data were not available in the literature. File: oo_32985.xlsx References cited in the database for life-history traits for European amphibians Data type: xls File: oo_32986.xlsx
RankScientific NameCommon Name
species Alytes cisternasii Iberian Midwife Toad
species Alytes dickhilleni Betic Midwife Toad
species Alytes muletensis Mallorcan Midwife Toad
species Alytes obstetricans Common Midwife Toad
species Anaxyrus americanus American Toad
species Atylodes genei Sardinian Cave Salamander
species Bombina bombina Fire-bellied Toad
species Bombina pachypus Appenine Yellow-bellied Toad
species Bombina variegata Yellow–bellied Toad
species Bufo bufo Common Toad
species Bufo mauritanicus Mauritanian Toad
species Calotriton arnoldi -
species Calotriton asper Pyrenean Brook Salamander
species Chioglossa lusitanica Golden-striped Salamander
species Discoglossus galganoi Iberian Painted Frog
species Discoglossus jeanneae Spanish Painted Frog
species Discoglossus montalentii Corsican Painted Frog
species Discoglossus pictus Painted Frog
species Discoglossus sardus Tyrrhenian Painted Frog
species Epidalea calamita Natterjack Toad
species Euproctus montanus Corsican Brook Salamander
species Euproctus platycephalus Sardinian Brook Salamander
species Hyla arborea European Tree Frog
species Hyla intermedia Italian Tree Frog
species Hyla meridionalis Mediterranean Tree Frog
species Hyla sarda Tyrrhenian Tree Frog
species Lissotriton boscai Iberian Newt
species Lissotriton helveticus Palmate Newt
species Lissotriton italicus Italian Newt
species Lissotriton montandoni Carpathian Newt
species Lissotriton vulgaris Smooth Newt
species Lithobates catesbeianus American Bullfrog
species Lithobates sylvaticus Wood Frog
species Lyciasalamandra helverseni -
species Lyciasalamandra luschani -
species Mesotriton alpestris Alpine Newt
species Pelobates cultripes Western Spadefoot
species Pelobates fuscus Common Spadefoot
species Pelobates syriacus Eastern Spadefoot
species Pelodytes ibericus Sapillo Moteado Ibérico
species Pelodytes punctatus Parsley Frog
species Pelophylax bedriagae Levant Water Frog
species Pelophylax bergeri Italian Pool Frog
species Pelophylax cerigensis Karpathos Frog
species Pelophylax cretensis Cretan Frog
species Pelophylax epeiroticus Epirus Water Frog
species Pelophylax esculentus Edible Frog
species Pelophylax grafi Rana De Graf
species Pelophylax hispanicus Italian Edible Frog
species Pelophylax kurtmuelleri Balkan Water Frog
species Pelophylax lessonae Pool Frog
species Pelophylax perezi Perez's Frog
species Pelophylax ridibundus Eurasian Marsh Frog
species Pelophylax shqipericus Albanian Water Frog
species Pleurodeles waltl Sharp-ribbed Salamander
species Proteus anguinus Proteus
species Pseudepidalea viridis Green Toad
species Rana arvalis Altai Brown Frog
species Rana dalmatina Agile Frog
species Rana graeca Greek Stream Frog
species Rana iberica Iberian Frog
species Rana italica Italian Stream Frog
species Rana latastei Italian Agile Frog
species Rana pyrenaica Pyrenean Frog
species Rana temporaria European Common Frog
species Salamandra algira North African Fire Salamander
species Salamandra atra Golden Salamander
species Salamandra corsica Corsican Fire Salamander
species Salamandra lanzai Lanza's Alpine Salamander
species Salamandra salamandra Common Fire Salamander
species Salamandrina perspicillata -
species Salamandrina terdigitata Spectacled Salamander
species Speleomantes ambrosii Ambrosi's Cave Salamander
species Speleomantes flavus Monte Albo Cave Salamander
species Speleomantes imperialis Imperial Cave Salamander
species Speleomantes italicus Italian Cave Salamander
species Speleomantes sarrabusensis -
species Speleomantes strinatii North-west Italian Cave Salamander
species Speleomantes supramontis Supramonte Cave Salamander
species Triturus carnifex Italian Crested New
species Triturus cristatus Northern Crested Newt
species Triturus dobrogicus Danube Crested Newt
species Triturus karelinii Southern Crested Newt
species Triturus marmoratus Marbled Newt
species Triturus pygmaeus Southern Marbled Newt
species Xenopus laevis Platanna
Data set 1.
Column labelColumn description
Sexual dimorphismSexual dimorphism
Body mass (in g)Body mass (in g)
Snout-to-vent length (in mm)Snout-to-vent length (in mm)
Total length (in mm)Total length (in mm)
Proportion head length/body lengthProportion head length/body length
Foot length (in mm)Foot length (in mm)
Hind limb length (in mm)Hind limb length (in mm)
Tibia length (in mm)Tibia length (in mm)
Proportion forelimb/hindlimb lengthProportion forelimb/hindlimb length
DiscsDiscs
WebbingWebbing
Number of toes/fingersNumber of toes/fingers
TubercleTubercle
ColorationColoration
ActivityActivity
Survival ratesSurvival rates
Sexual maturity (in years)Sexual maturity (in years)
Mating systemsMating systems
Number of eggs/offspringNumber of eggs/offspring
Egg laying modeEgg laying mode
Eggs and larvae characteristicsEggs and larvae characteristics
Clutch positionClutch position
Breeding seasonBreeding season
Parental careParental care
Active or passive feedingActive or passive feeding
Food of juvenilesFood of juveniles
Food of adultsFood of adults
MetabolismMetabolism
DefenseDefense
CommunicationCommunication
TerritorialityTerritoriality
Home rangeHome range
Movement eventMovement event
Dispersal active or passiveDispersal active or passive
Sex biased dispersalSex biased dispersal
Mode of displacementMode of displacement
DispersalDispersal
MigrationMigration
HabitatHabitat
TopographyTopography
Biogeographical regionBiogeographical region
DistributionDistribution
IUCN statusIUCN status
Population trendPopulation trend
Major threatsMajor threats
  8 in total

1.  Quantitative evidence for global amphibian population declines.

Authors:  J E Houlahan; C S Findlay; B R Schmidt; A H Meyer; S L Kuzmin
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2000-04-13       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Status and trends of amphibian declines and extinctions worldwide.

Authors:  Simon N Stuart; Janice S Chanson; Neil A Cox; Bruce E Young; Ana S L Rodrigues; Debra L Fischman; Robert W Waller
Journal:  Science       Date:  2004-10-14       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Ecology: global warming and amphibian losses.

Authors:  Ross A Alford; Kay S Bradfield; Stephen J Richards
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2007-05-31       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Ecology. Essential biodiversity variables.

Authors:  H M Pereira; S Ferrier; M Walters; G N Geller; R H G Jongman; R J Scholes; M W Bruford; N Brummitt; S H M Butchart; A C Cardoso; N C Coops; E Dulloo; D P Faith; J Freyhof; R D Gregory; C Heip; R Höft; G Hurtt; W Jetz; D S Karp; M A McGeoch; D Obura; Y Onoda; N Pettorelli; B Reyers; R Sayre; J P W Scharlemann; S N Stuart; E Turak; M Walpole; M Wegmann
Journal:  Science       Date:  2013-01-18       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Synergism between UV-B radiation and a pathogen magnifies amphibian embryo mortality in nature.

Authors:  J M Kiesecker; A R Blaustein
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1995-11-21       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Effects of ultraviolet-B radiation on behaviour and growth of three species of amphibian larvae.

Authors:  Maarit Pahkala; Anssi Laurila; Juha Merilä
Journal:  Chemosphere       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 7.086

7.  Factors driving pathogenicity vs. prevalence of amphibian panzootic chytridiomycosis in Iberia.

Authors:  Susan F Walker; Jaime Bosch; Virgilio Gomez; Trenton W J Garner; Andrew A Cunningham; Dirk S Schmeller; Miguel Ninyerola; Daniel A Henk; Cedric Ginestet; Christian-Philippe Arthur; Matthew C Fisher
Journal:  Ecol Lett       Date:  2010-01-27       Impact factor: 9.492

8.  Changes in breeding phenology of eastern Ontario frogs over four decades.

Authors:  Samantha P Klaus; Stephen C Lougheed
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2013-02-26       Impact factor: 2.912

  8 in total
  11 in total

1.  A database of threat statuses and life-history traits of Red List species in Flanders (northern Belgium).

Authors:  Dirk Maes; Dimitri Brosens; Filiep T'jollyn; Peter Desmet; Frederic Piesschaert; Stijn Van Hoey; Tim Adriaens; Wouter Dekoninck; Koen Devos; Koen Lock; Thierry Onkelinx; Jo Packet; Jeroen Speybroeck; Arno Thomaes; Koen Van Den Berge; Wouter Van Landuyt; Hugo Verreycken
Journal:  Biodivers Data J       Date:  2019-04-05

2.  Exotic Fish in Exotic Plantations: A Multi-Scale Approach to Understand Amphibian Occurrence in the Mediterranean Region.

Authors:  Joana Cruz; Pedro Sarmento; Miguel A Carretero; Piran C L White
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-06-10       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Concordant morphological and molecular clines in a contact zone of the Common and Spined toad (Bufo bufo and B. spinosus) in the northwest of France.

Authors:  Jan W Arntzen; Tania Trujillo; Roland Butôt; Klaas Vrieling; Onno Schaap; Jorge Gutiérrez-Rodríguez; Iñigo Martínez-Solano
Journal:  Front Zool       Date:  2016-12-19       Impact factor: 3.172

4.  AmphiBIO, a global database for amphibian ecological traits.

Authors:  Brunno Freire Oliveira; Vinícius Avelar São-Pedro; Georgina Santos-Barrera; Caterina Penone; Gabriel C Costa
Journal:  Sci Data       Date:  2017-09-05       Impact factor: 6.444

5.  Amphibian and reptile road-kills on tertiary roads in relation to landscape structure: using a citizen science approach with open-access land cover data.

Authors:  Florian Heigl; Kathrin Horvath; Gregor Laaha; Johann G Zaller
Journal:  BMC Ecol       Date:  2017-06-26       Impact factor: 2.964

6.  Data gaps and opportunities for comparative and conservation biology.

Authors:  Dalia A Conde; Johanna Staerk; Fernando Colchero; Rita da Silva; Jonas Schöley; H Maria Baden; Lionel Jouvet; Julia E Fa; Hassan Syed; Eelke Jongejans; Shai Meiri; Jean-Michel Gaillard; Scott Chamberlain; Jonathan Wilcken; Owen R Jones; Johan P Dahlgren; Ulrich K Steiner; Lucie M Bland; Ivan Gomez-Mestre; Jean-Dominique Lebreton; Jaime González Vargas; Nate Flesness; Vladimir Canudas-Romo; Roberto Salguero-Gómez; Onnie Byers; Thomas Bjørneboe Berg; Alexander Scheuerlein; Sébastien Devillard; Dmitry S Schigel; Oliver A Ryder; Hugh P Possingham; Annette Baudisch; James W Vaupel
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2019-04-19       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Tracing species replacement in Iberian marbled newts.

Authors:  Julia López-Delgado; Isolde van Riemsdijk; Jan W Arntzen
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2020-12-15       Impact factor: 2.912

Review 8.  COMADRE: a global data base of animal demography.

Authors:  Roberto Salguero-Gómez; Owen R Jones; C Ruth Archer; Christoph Bein; Hendrik de Buhr; Claudia Farack; Fränce Gottschalk; Alexander Hartmann; Anne Henning; Gabriel Hoppe; Gesa Römer; Tara Ruoff; Veronika Sommer; Julia Wille; Jakob Voigt; Stefan Zeh; Dirk Vieregg; Yvonne M Buckley; Judy Che-Castaldo; David Hodgson; Alexander Scheuerlein; Hal Caswell; James W Vaupel
Journal:  J Anim Ecol       Date:  2016-01-27       Impact factor: 5.091

9.  The evolution of parental care diversity in amphibians.

Authors:  Andrew I Furness; Isabella Capellini
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2019-10-17       Impact factor: 14.919

10.  Biodiversity can benefit from climate stabilization despite adverse side effects of land-based mitigation.

Authors:  Haruka Ohashi; Tomoko Hasegawa; Akiko Hirata; Shinichiro Fujimori; Kiyoshi Takahashi; Ikutaro Tsuyama; Katsuhiro Nakao; Yuji Kominami; Nobuyuki Tanaka; Yasuaki Hijioka; Tetsuya Matsui
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2019-11-20       Impact factor: 14.919

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.