Samuel L Buckner1, Scott J Dankel1, Kevin T Mattocks1, Matthew B Jessee1, J Grant Mouser1, Brittany R Counts1, Gilberto C Laurentino1, Jeremy P Loenneke2. 1. Kevser Ermin Applied Physiology Laboratory, Department of Health, Exercise Science, and Recreation Management, The University of Mississippi, P.O. Box 1848, University, MS, 38677, USA. 2. Kevser Ermin Applied Physiology Laboratory, Department of Health, Exercise Science, and Recreation Management, The University of Mississippi, P.O. Box 1848, University, MS, 38677, USA. jploenne@olemiss.edu.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To examine the swelling response and other markers of muscle damage throughout the early portions of a training program (Experiment 1). We also determined if a "swollen" muscle could swell further following additional exercise (Experiment 2). METHODS: Nine males performed four sets of biceps curls (or time-matched rest on control arm) at 70% of their one-repetition maximum three times over 8 days. Muscle thickness and torque were measured before and after exercise as well as on the days in between. Soreness was measured at the beginning of each day (Experiment 1). On the final day (Experiment 2), participants performed two bouts of exercise, followed by additional measures of muscle thickness. RESULTS: Following three bouts of exercise, muscle thickness was elevated over baseline (mean of visit 9 pre to visit 2 pre, 95% CI) at the 50% [0.21 (0.07, 0.34) cm], 60% [0.21 (0.02, 0.39) cm], and 70% [0.21 (0.06, 0.36) cm] sites. However, differences from a non-exercise control were only observed immediately following bouts of exercise (indicative of acute swelling). Torque was lower at every time point following the first bout of exercise and remained suppressed relative to pre at visit 9 [-6.1 (-11.7, -0.47 Nm] in the experimental arm. Experiment 2 found that a swollen muscle could not appreciably swell more. CONCLUSION: Resting levels of muscle thickness do not appear to change beyond what occurs following the first naïve bout of exercise. Also, the acute swelling response may be used to differentiate swelling from muscle growth.
PURPOSE: To examine the swelling response and other markers of muscle damage throughout the early portions of a training program (Experiment 1). We also determined if a "swollen" muscle could swell further following additional exercise (Experiment 2). METHODS: Nine males performed four sets of biceps curls (or time-matched rest on control arm) at 70% of their one-repetition maximum three times over 8 days. Muscle thickness and torque were measured before and after exercise as well as on the days in between. Soreness was measured at the beginning of each day (Experiment 1). On the final day (Experiment 2), participants performed two bouts of exercise, followed by additional measures of muscle thickness. RESULTS: Following three bouts of exercise, muscle thickness was elevated over baseline (mean of visit 9 pre to visit 2 pre, 95% CI) at the 50% [0.21 (0.07, 0.34) cm], 60% [0.21 (0.02, 0.39) cm], and 70% [0.21 (0.06, 0.36) cm] sites. However, differences from a non-exercise control were only observed immediately following bouts of exercise (indicative of acute swelling). Torque was lower at every time point following the first bout of exercise and remained suppressed relative to pre at visit 9 [-6.1 (-11.7, -0.47 Nm] in the experimental arm. Experiment 2 found that a swollen muscle could not appreciably swell more. CONCLUSION: Resting levels of muscle thickness do not appear to change beyond what occurs following the first naïve bout of exercise. Also, the acute swelling response may be used to differentiate swelling from muscle growth.
Authors: Jeremy P Loenneke; Robert S Thiebaud; Christopher A Fahs; Lindy M Rossow; Takashi Abe; Michael G Bemben Journal: Eur J Appl Physiol Date: 2012-09-27 Impact factor: 3.078
Authors: Jeremy P Loenneke; Daeyeol Kim; Christopher A Fahs; Robert S Thiebaud; Takashi Abe; Rebecca D Larson; Debra A Bemben; Michael G Bemben Journal: Clin Physiol Funct Imaging Date: 2016-04-14 Impact factor: 2.273
Authors: Jason M DeFreitas; Travis W Beck; Matt S Stock; Michael A Dillon; Paul R Kasishke Journal: Eur J Appl Physiol Date: 2011-03-16 Impact factor: 3.078
Authors: Ethan C Hill; Terry J Housh; Joshua L Keller; Cory M Smith; John V Anders; Richard J Schmidt; Glen O Johnson; Joel T Cramer Journal: Eur J Appl Physiol Date: 2021-02-27 Impact factor: 3.078
Authors: Ecaterina Vasenina; Ryo Kataoka; William B Hammert; Adam H Ibrahim; Samuel L Buckner Journal: J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact Date: 2022-09-01 Impact factor: 1.864
Authors: Matthew B Jessee; Samuel L Buckner; J Grant Mouser; Kevin T Mattocks; Scott J Dankel; Takashi Abe; Zachary W Bell; John P Bentley; Jeremy P Loenneke Journal: Front Physiol Date: 2018-10-16 Impact factor: 4.566