Literature DB >> 30479636

Reliability and differences in quadriceps femoris muscle morphology using ultrasonography: The effects of body position and rest time.

Patrick M Tomko1, Tyler Wd Muddle1, Mitchel A Magrini1, Ryan J Colquhoun1, Micheal J Luera1, Nathaniel Dm Jenkins1.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this investigation was to: (1) to determine the reliability of rectus femoris muscle cross-sectional area and echo intensity obtained using panoramic ultrasound imaging during seated and supine lying positions before and after a 5-minute rest period and (2) to determine the influence of body position and rest period on the magnitude of rectus femoris muscle cross-sectional area and echo intensity measurements.
METHODS: A total of 23 males and females (age = 21.5 ± 1.9 years) visited the laboratory on two separate occasions. During each visit, panoramic ultrasound images of the rectus femoris were obtained in both a seated and a supine position before (T1) and after a 5-minute (T2) rest period to quantify any potential changes in either muscle cross-sectional area and/or echo intensity.
RESULTS: None of the muscle cross-sectional area or echo intensity measurements exhibited systematic variability, and the ICCs were 0.98-0.99 and 0.88-0.91, and the coefficients of variation were ≤ 3.9% and ≤ 8.2% for muscle cross-sectional area and echo intensity, respectively. Our results indicated that muscle cross-sectional area was greater in the seated than supine position, whereas echo intensity was greater in the supine position. Further, echo intensity increased in the seated position from T1 to T2.
CONCLUSION: Both rectus femoris muscle cross-sectional area and echo intensity may be reliably measured in either a seated or supine lying position before or after a 5-minute rest period. Aside from echo intensity in the seated position, rest period had no influence on the magnitude of muscle cross-sectional area or echo intensity. Comparison of muscle cross-sectional area values that are obtained in different body positions is ill-advised.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Panoramic ultrasound imaging; bi-articular muscle; fluid re-distribution; muscle architecture; reproducibility

Year:  2018        PMID: 30479636      PMCID: PMC6243455          DOI: 10.1177/1742271X18780127

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ultrasound        ISSN: 1742-271X


  41 in total

1.  Measures of reliability in sports medicine and science.

Authors:  W G Hopkins
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 11.136

Review 2.  Assessment and interpretation of isokinetic muscle strength during growth and maturation.

Authors:  Mark De Ste Croix; Martine Deighan; Neil Armstrong
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 11.136

3.  Reliability and validity of panoramic ultrasound for muscle quantification.

Authors:  Jessica M Scott; David S Martin; Robert Ploutz-Snyder; Timothy Caine; Timothy Matz; Natalia M Arzeno; Roxanne Buxton; Lori Ploutz-Snyder
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2012-06-30       Impact factor: 2.998

4.  Quadriceps femoris torque and EMG activity in seated versus supine position.

Authors:  Nicola A Maffiuletti; Romuald Lepers
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 5.411

5.  Concomitant changes in cross-sectional area and water content in skeletal muscle after resistance exercise.

Authors:  M S Kristiansen; A Uhrbrand; M Hansen; J M Shiguetomi-Medina; K Vissing; H Stødkilde-Jørgensen; H Langberg
Journal:  Scand J Med Sci Sports       Date:  2013-12-15       Impact factor: 4.221

6.  Effects of supine rest duration on ultrasound measures of the vastus lateralis.

Authors:  Eliott Arroyo; Jeffrey R Stout; Kyle S Beyer; David D Church; Alyssa N Varanoske; David H Fukuda; Jay R Hoffman
Journal:  Clin Physiol Funct Imaging       Date:  2016-12-16       Impact factor: 2.273

7.  Skeletal muscle sonography: a correlative study of echogenicity and morphology.

Authors:  K Reimers; C D Reimers; S Wagner; I Paetzke; D E Pongratz
Journal:  J Ultrasound Med       Date:  1993-02       Impact factor: 2.153

8.  Validation of musculoskeletal ultrasound to assess and quantify muscle glycogen content. A novel approach.

Authors:  John C Hill; Iñigo San Millán
Journal:  Phys Sportsmed       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 2.241

9.  Age-related differences in rates of torque development and rise in EMG are eliminated by normalization.

Authors:  Nathaniel D M Jenkins; Samuel L Buckner; Kristen C Cochrane; Haley C Bergstrom; Ty B Palmer; Glen O Johnson; Richard J Schmidt; Terry J Housh; Joel T Cramer
Journal:  Exp Gerontol       Date:  2014-05-05       Impact factor: 4.032

10.  Reliability and validity of the ultrasound technique to measure the rectus femoris muscle diameter in older CAD-patients.

Authors:  Tom Thomaes; Martine Thomis; Steven Onkelinx; Walter Coudyzer; Véronique Cornelissen; Luc Vanhees
Journal:  BMC Med Imaging       Date:  2012-04-02       Impact factor: 1.930

View more
  6 in total

Review 1.  Echo intensity as an indicator of skeletal muscle quality: applications, methodology, and future directions.

Authors:  Matt S Stock; Brennan J Thompson
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2020-11-21       Impact factor: 3.078

Review 2.  Human skeletal muscle size with ultrasound imaging: a comprehensive review.

Authors:  Masatoshi Naruse; Scott Trappe; Todd A Trappe
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2022-03-31

3.  Reliability of lumbar multifidus and iliocostalis lumborum thickness and echogenicity measurements using ultrasound imaging.

Authors:  Joshua Farragher; Adrian Pranata; Doa El-Ansary; Selina Parry; Gavin Williams; Colin Royse; Alistair Royse; Molly O'Donohue; Adam Bryant
Journal:  Australas J Ultrasound Med       Date:  2021-06-23

4.  Echo intensity reliability between two rectus femoris probe sites.

Authors:  Rodrigo Rabello; Matias Fröhlich; Aline Felicio Bueno; Miriam Allein Zago Marcolino; Thainá De Bona Bernardi; Graciele Sbruzzi; Marco Aurélio Vaz
Journal:  Ultrasound       Date:  2019-06-06

5.  Effect of position and exercise on measurement of muscle quantity and quality: towards a standardised pragmatic protocol for clinical practice.

Authors:  Carly Welch; Zeinab Majid; Isabelle Andrews; Zaki Hassan-Smith; Vicky Kamwa; Hannah Picton; Daisy Wilson; Thomas A Jackson
Journal:  BMC Sports Sci Med Rehabil       Date:  2021-01-07

6.  Ultrasound assessment of muscle mass in response to exercise training in chronic kidney disease: a comparison with MRI.

Authors:  Douglas W Gould; Emma L Watson; Thomas J Wilkinson; Joanne Wormleighton; Soteris Xenophontos; Joao L Viana; Alice C Smith
Journal:  J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle       Date:  2019-05-03       Impact factor: 12.910

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.