Literature DB >> 24610245

The contribution of muscle hypertrophy to strength changes following resistance training.

Robert M Erskine1, Gareth Fletcher, Jonathan P Folland.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Whilst skeletal muscle hypertrophy is considered an important adaptation to resistance training (RT), it has not previously been found to explain the inter-individual changes in strength after RT. This study investigated the contribution of hypertrophy to individual gains in isometric, isoinertial and explosive strength after 12 weeks of elbow flexor RT.
METHODS: Thirty-three previously untrained, healthy men (18-30 years) completed an initial 3-week period of elbow flexor RT (to facilitate neurological responses) followed by 6-week no training, and then 12-week elbow flexor RT. Unilateral elbow flexor muscle strength [isometric maximum voluntary force (iMVF), single repetition maximum (1-RM) and explosive force], muscle volume (V(m)), muscle fascicle pennation angle (θ(p)) and normalized agonist, antagonist and stabilizer sEMG were assessed pre and post 12-week RT.
RESULTS: Percentage gains in V(m) correlated with percentage changes in iMVF (r = 0.527; P = 0.002) and 1-RM (r = 0.482; P = 0.005) but not in explosive force (r ≤ 0.243; P ≥ 0.175). Percentage changes in iMVF, 1-RM, and explosive force did not correlate with percentage changes in agonist, antagonist or stabilizer sEMG (all P > 0.05). Percentage gains in θ(p) inversely correlated with percentage changes in normalized explosive force at 150 ms after force onset (r = 0.362; P = 0.038).
CONCLUSIONS: We have shown for the first time that muscle hypertrophy explains a significant proportion of the inter-individual variability in isometric and isoinertial strength gains following 12-week elbow flexor RT in healthy young men.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24610245     DOI: 10.1007/s00421-014-2855-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol        ISSN: 1439-6319            Impact factor:   3.078


  40 in total

1.  Muscle volume is a major determinant of joint torque in humans.

Authors:  T Fukunaga; M Miyatani; M Tachi; M Kouzaki; Y Kawakami; H Kanehisa
Journal:  Acta Physiol Scand       Date:  2001-08

2.  Maximal voluntary force and rate of force development in humans--importance of instruction.

Authors:  R Sahaly; H Vandewalle; T Driss; H Monod
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 3.078

Review 3.  How should we normalize electromyograms obtained from healthy participants? What we have learned from over 25 years of research.

Authors:  Adrian Burden
Journal:  J Electromyogr Kinesiol       Date:  2010-08-10       Impact factor: 2.368

4.  Maximal and explosive strength training elicit distinct neuromuscular adaptations, specific to the training stimulus.

Authors:  Neale A Tillin; Jonathan P Folland
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2013-12-01       Impact factor: 3.078

5.  The role of learning and coordination in strength training.

Authors:  O M Rutherford; D A Jones
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol       Date:  1986

6.  Force-velocity properties of human skeletal muscle fibres: myosin heavy chain isoform and temperature dependence.

Authors:  R Bottinelli; M Canepari; M A Pellegrino; C Reggiani
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1996-09-01       Impact factor: 5.182

7.  Skeletal muscle hypertrophy and structure and function of skeletal muscle fibres in male body builders.

Authors:  Giuseppe D'Antona; Francesca Lanfranconi; Maria Antonietta Pellegrino; Lorenza Brocca; Raffaella Adami; Rosetta Rossi; Giorgio Moro; Danilo Miotti; Monica Canepari; Roberto Bottinelli
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2005-12-08       Impact factor: 5.182

8.  Neural factors versus hypertrophy in the time course of muscle strength gain.

Authors:  T Moritani; H A deVries
Journal:  Am J Phys Med       Date:  1979-06

9.  Muscle hypertrophy in men and women.

Authors:  K J Cureton; M A Collins; D W Hill; F M McElhannon
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  1988-08       Impact factor: 5.411

10.  Fatigue is not a necessary stimulus for strength gains during resistance training.

Authors:  J P Folland; C S Irish; J C Roberts; J E Tarr; D A Jones
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 13.800

View more
  34 in total

1.  Differential changes in muscle architecture and neuromuscular fatigability induced by isometric resistance training at short and long muscle-tendon unit lengths.

Authors:  Ryota Akagi; Avery Hinks; Geoffrey A Power
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2020-06-18

2.  Exercise-Induced Myofibrillar Hypertrophy is a Contributory Cause of Gains in Muscle Strength.

Authors:  Christopher B Taber; Andrew Vigotsky; Greg Nuckols; Cody T Haun
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2019-07       Impact factor: 11.136

3.  Patterns of responses and time-course of changes in muscle size and strength during low-load blood flow restriction resistance training in women.

Authors:  Ethan C Hill; Terry J Housh; Joshua L Keller; Cory M Smith; John V Anders; Richard J Schmidt; Glen O Johnson; Joel T Cramer
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2021-02-27       Impact factor: 3.078

4.  Muscle size and strength: debunking the "completely separate phenomena" suggestion.

Authors:  Thomas G Balshaw; Garry J Massey; Thomas M Maden-Wilkinson; Jonathan P Folland
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2017-04-22       Impact factor: 3.078

5.  Changes in agonist neural drive, hypertrophy and pre-training strength all contribute to the individual strength gains after resistance training.

Authors:  Thomas G Balshaw; Garry J Massey; Thomas M Maden-Wilkinson; Antonio J Morales-Artacho; Alexandra McKeown; Clare L Appleby; Jonathan P Folland
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2017-02-26       Impact factor: 3.078

Review 6.  Interpreting Adaptation to Concurrent Compared with Single-Mode Exercise Training: Some Methodological Considerations.

Authors:  Jackson J Fyfe; Jeremy P Loenneke
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 11.136

7.  Correlations Do Not Show Cause and Effect: Not Even for Changes in Muscle Size and Strength.

Authors:  Scott J Dankel; Samuel L Buckner; Matthew B Jessee; J Grant Mouser; Kevin T Mattocks; Takashi Abe; Jeremy P Loenneke
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 11.136

8.  Low-load blood flow restriction elicits greater concentric strength than non-blood flow restriction resistance training but similar isometric strength and muscle size.

Authors:  Ethan C Hill; Terry J Housh; Joshua L Keller; Cory M Smith; John V Anders; Richard J Schmidt; Glen O Johnson; Joel T Cramer
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2019-12-17       Impact factor: 3.078

9.  Is the joint-angle specificity of isometric resistance training real? And if so, does it have a neural basis?

Authors:  Marcel B Lanza; Thomas G Balshaw; Jonathan P Folland
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2019-09-14       Impact factor: 3.078

10.  Medium-intensity, high-volume "hypertrophic" resistance training did not induce improvements in rapid force production in healthy older men.

Authors:  Simon Walker; Heikki Peltonen; Keijo Häkkinen
Journal:  Age (Dordr)       Date:  2015-04-25
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.