Literature DB >> 28011838

Analysis of lead placement optimization metrics in cardiac resynchronization therapy with computational modelling.

Andrew Crozier1,2, Bojan Blazevic1, Pablo Lamata1, Gernot Plank2, Matthew Ginks3, Simon Duckett3, Manav Sohal3, Anoop Shetty3, Christopher A Rinaldi3, Reza Razavi1, Steven A Niederer1, Nicolas P Smith4,5.   

Abstract

AIMS: The efficacy of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is known to vary considerably with pacing location, however the most effective set of metrics by which to select the optimal pacing site is not yet well understood. Computational modelling offers a powerful methodology to comprehensively test the effect of pacing location in silico and investigate how to best optimize therapy using clinically available metrics for the individual patient. METHODS AND
RESULTS: Personalized computational models of cardiac electromechanics were used to perform an in silico left ventricle (LV) pacing site optimization study as part of biventricular CRT in three patient cases. Maps of response to therapy according to changes in total activation time (ΔTAT) and acute haemodynamic response (AHR) were generated and compared with preclinical metrics of electrical function, strain, stress, and mechanical work to assess their suitability for selecting the optimal pacing site. In all three patients, response to therapy was highly sensitive to pacing location, with laterobasal locations being optimal. ΔTAT and AHR were found to be correlated (ρ < -0.80), as were AHR and the preclinical activation time at the pacing site (ρ ≥ 0.73), however pacing in the last activated site did not result in the optimal response to therapy in all cases.
CONCLUSION: This computational modelling study supports pacing in laterobasal locations, optimizing pacing site by minimizing paced QRS duration and pacing in regions activated late at sinus rhythm. Results demonstrate information content is redundant using multiple preclinical metrics. Of significance, the correlation of AHR with ΔTAT indicates that minimization of QRSd is a promising metric for optimization of lead placement. Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved.
© The Author 2016. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cardiac resynchronization therapy; Computational modelling; Heart failure; Optimization; Patient-specific

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 28011838      PMCID: PMC5225964          DOI: 10.1093/europace/euw366

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Europace        ISSN: 1099-5129            Impact factor:   5.214


  20 in total

1.  Cardiac resynchronization in chronic heart failure.

Authors:  William T Abraham; Westby G Fisher; Andrew L Smith; David B Delurgio; Angel R Leon; Evan Loh; Dusan Z Kocovic; Milton Packer; Alfredo L Clavell; David L Hayes; Myrvin Ellestad; Robin J Trupp; Jackie Underwood; Faith Pickering; Cindy Truex; Peggy McAtee; John Messenger
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2002-06-13       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Guidelines for cardiac pacing and cardiac resynchronization therapy. The Task Force for Cardiac Pacing and Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy of the European Society of Cardiology. Developed in collaboration with the European Heart Rhythm Association.

Authors:  Panos E Vardas; Angelo Auricchio; Jean-Jacques Blanc; Jean-Claude Daubert; Helmut Drexler; Hugo Ector; Maurizio Gasparini; Cecilia Linde; Francisco Bello Morgado; Ali Oto; Richard Sutton; Maria Trusz-Gluza
Journal:  Europace       Date:  2007-08-28       Impact factor: 5.214

3.  Invasive acute hemodynamic response to guide left ventricular lead implantation predicts chronic remodeling in patients undergoing cardiac resynchronization therapy.

Authors:  Simon G Duckett; Matthew Ginks; Anoop K Shetty; Julian Bostock; Jaswinder S Gill; Shoaib Hamid; Stam Kapetanakis; Eliane Cunliffe; Reza Razavi; Gerry Carr-White; C Aldo Rinaldi
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2011-09-06       Impact factor: 24.094

4.  Effect of resynchronization therapy stimulation site on the systolic function of heart failure patients.

Authors:  C Butter; A Auricchio; C Stellbrink; E Fleck; J Ding; Y Yu; E Huvelle; J Spinelli
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2001-12-18       Impact factor: 29.690

5.  An accurate, fast and robust method to generate patient-specific cubic Hermite meshes.

Authors:  Pablo Lamata; Steven Niederer; David Nordsletten; David C Barber; Ishani Roy; D Rod Hose; Nic Smith
Journal:  Med Image Anal       Date:  2011-07-06       Impact factor: 8.545

6.  QRS duration and shortening to predict clinical response to cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients with end-stage heart failure.

Authors:  Sander G Molhoek; Lieselot VAN Erven; Marianne Bootsma; Paul Steendijk; Ernst E Van Der Wall; Martin J Schalij
Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 1.976

7.  Impact of pacing site on QRS duration and its relationship to hemodynamic response in cardiac resynchronization therapy for congestive heart failure.

Authors:  Nicolas Derval; Pierre Bordachar; Han S Lim; Frederic Sacher; Sylvain Ploux; Julien Laborderie; Paul Steendijk; Antoine Deplagne; Philippe Ritter; Stephane Garrigue; Arnaud Denis; Mélèze Hocini; Michel Haissaguerre; Jacques Clementy; Pierre Jaïs
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol       Date:  2014-07-24

8.  Myocardial infarction does not preclude electrical and hemodynamic benefits of cardiac resynchronization therapy in dyssynchronous canine hearts.

Authors:  Leonard M Rademakers; Roeland van Kerckhoven; Caroline J M van Deursen; Marc Strik; Arne van Hunnik; Marion Kuiper; Anniek Lampert; Catherine Klersy; Francisco Leyva; Angelo Auricchio; Jos G Maessen; Frits W Prinzen
Journal:  Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol       Date:  2010-05-21

Review 9.  Strategies to improve cardiac resynchronization therapy.

Authors:  Kevin Vernooy; Caroline J M van Deursen; Marc Strik; Frits W Prinzen
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2014-05-20       Impact factor: 32.419

10.  Simulating human cardiac electrophysiology on clinical time-scales.

Authors:  Steven Niederer; Lawrence Mitchell; Nicolas Smith; Gernot Plank
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2011-04-09       Impact factor: 4.566

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Patient-Specific Cardiovascular Computational Modeling: Diversity of Personalization and Challenges.

Authors:  Richard A Gray; Pras Pathmanathan
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Transl Res       Date:  2018-03-06       Impact factor: 4.132

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.