INTRODUCTION: Recent studies have demonstrated that left ventricular (LV) pacing site is a critical parameter in optimizing cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). The present study evaluates the effect of pacing from different LV locations on QRS duration (QRSd) and their relationship to acute hemodynamic response in congestive heart failure patients. METHODS AND RESULTS: Thirty-five patients with nonischemic dilated cardiomyopathy and left bundle branch block referred for CRT device implantation were studied. Eleven predetermined LV pacing sites were systematically assessed in random order: epicardial: coronary sinus (CS); endocardial: basal and mid-cavity (septal, anterior, lateral, and inferior), apex, and the endocardial site facing the CS pacing site. For each patient QRSd and +dP/dtmax during baseline (AAI) and DDD LV pacing at 2 atrioventricular delays were compared. Response to CRT was significantly better in patients with wider baseline QRSd (≥150 milliseconds). Hemodynamic response was inversely correlated to increase of QRSd during LV pacing (short atrioventricular [AV] delay: r = 0.44, P < 0.001; long AV delay: r = 0.59, P < 0.001). Compared to baseline, LV pacing at the site of shortest QRSd significantly improved +dP/dtmax (+18 ± 25%, P < 0.001) but was not superior to other conventional strategy (lateral wall, CS pacing, and echo-guided) and was inferior to a hemodynamically guided strategy. CONCLUSIONS: In our study, we have demonstrated that changes of QRSd during LV pacing correlated with acute hemodynamic response and that LV pacing location was a primary determinant of paced QRSd. Although QRSd did not predict the maximum hemodynamic response, our results confirm the link between electrical activation and hemodynamic response of the LV during CRT.
INTRODUCTION: Recent studies have demonstrated that left ventricular (LV) pacing site is a critical parameter in optimizing cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). The present study evaluates the effect of pacing from different LV locations on QRS duration (QRSd) and their relationship to acute hemodynamic response in congestive heart failurepatients. METHODS AND RESULTS: Thirty-five patients with nonischemic dilated cardiomyopathy and left bundle branch block referred for CRT device implantation were studied. Eleven predetermined LV pacing sites were systematically assessed in random order: epicardial: coronary sinus (CS); endocardial: basal and mid-cavity (septal, anterior, lateral, and inferior), apex, and the endocardial site facing the CS pacing site. For each patient QRSd and +dP/dtmax during baseline (AAI) and DDD LV pacing at 2 atrioventricular delays were compared. Response to CRT was significantly better in patients with wider baseline QRSd (≥150 milliseconds). Hemodynamic response was inversely correlated to increase of QRSd during LV pacing (short atrioventricular [AV] delay: r = 0.44, P < 0.001; long AV delay: r = 0.59, P < 0.001). Compared to baseline, LV pacing at the site of shortest QRSd significantly improved +dP/dtmax (+18 ± 25%, P < 0.001) but was not superior to other conventional strategy (lateral wall, CS pacing, and echo-guided) and was inferior to a hemodynamically guided strategy. CONCLUSIONS: In our study, we have demonstrated that changes of QRSd during LV pacing correlated with acute hemodynamic response and that LV pacing location was a primary determinant of paced QRSd. Although QRSd did not predict the maximum hemodynamic response, our results confirm the link between electrical activation and hemodynamic response of the LV during CRT.
Authors: Andrew Crozier; Bojan Blazevic; Pablo Lamata; Gernot Plank; Matthew Ginks; Simon Duckett; Manav Sohal; Anoop Shetty; Christopher A Rinaldi; Reza Razavi; Steven A Niederer; Nicolas P Smith Journal: Europace Date: 2016-12 Impact factor: 5.214
Authors: Jonathan M Behar; Tom Jackson; Eoin Hyde; Simon Claridge; Jaswinder Gill; Julian Bostock; Manav Sohal; Bradley Porter; Mark O'Neill; Reza Razavi; Steve Niederer; Christopher Aldo Rinaldi Journal: JACC Clin Electrophysiol Date: 2016-12
Authors: Angela W C Lee; Caroline Mendonca Costa; Marina Strocchi; Christopher A Rinaldi; Steven A Niederer Journal: J Cardiovasc Transl Res Date: 2018-01-11 Impact factor: 4.132
Authors: A W C Lee; U C Nguyen; O Razeghi; J Gould; B S Sidhu; B Sieniewicz; J Behar; M Mafi-Rad; G Plank; F W Prinzen; C A Rinaldi; K Vernooy; S Niederer Journal: Med Image Anal Date: 2019-07-05 Impact factor: 8.545
Authors: Andrew Crozier; Bojan Blazevic; Pablo Lamata; Gernot Plank; Matthew Ginks; Simon Duckett; Manav Sohal; Anoop Shetty; Christopher A Rinaldi; Reza Razavi; Nicolas P Smith; Steven A Niederer Journal: J Mol Cell Cardiol Date: 2015-11-04 Impact factor: 5.000
Authors: Eoin R Hyde; Jonathan M Behar; Andrew Crozier; Simon Claridge; Tom Jackson; Manav Sohal; Jaswinder S Gill; Mark D O'Neill; Reza Razavi; Steven A Niederer; Christopher A Rinaldi Journal: Pacing Clin Electrophysiol Date: 2016-05-09 Impact factor: 1.976