Literature DB >> 28011703

Optogenetic termination of ventricular arrhythmias in the whole heart: towards biological cardiac rhythm management.

Emile C A Nyns1, Annemarie Kip1, Cindy I Bart1, Jaap J Plomp2, Katja Zeppenfeld1, Martin J Schalij1, Antoine A F de Vries1, Daniël A Pijnappels1.   

Abstract

AIMS: Current treatments of ventricular arrhythmias rely on modulation of cardiac electrical function through drugs, ablation or electroshocks, which are all non-biological and rather unspecific, irreversible or traumatizing interventions. Optogenetics, however, is a novel, biological technique allowing electrical modulation in a specific, reversible and trauma-free manner using light-gated ion channels. The aim of our study was to investigate optogenetic termination of ventricular arrhythmias in the whole heart. METHODS AND
RESULTS: Systemic delivery of cardiotropic adeno-associated virus vectors, encoding the light-gated depolarizing ion channel red-activatable channelrhodopsin (ReaChR), resulted in global cardiomyocyte-restricted transgene expression in adult Wistar rat hearts allowing ReaChR-mediated depolarization and pacing. Next, ventricular tachyarrhythmias (VTs) were induced in the optogenetically modified hearts by burst pacing in a Langendorff setup, followed by programmed, local epicardial illumination. A single 470-nm light pulse (1000 ms, 2.97 mW/mm2) terminated 97% of monomorphic and 57% of polymorphic VTs vs. 0% without illumination, as assessed by electrocardiogram recordings. Optical mapping showed significant prolongation of voltage signals just before arrhythmia termination. Pharmacological action potential duration (APD) shortening almost fully inhibited light-induced arrhythmia termination indicating an important role for APD in this process.
CONCLUSION: Brief local epicardial illumination of the optogenetically modified adult rat heart allows contact- and shock-free termination of ventricular arrhythmias in an effective and repetitive manner after optogenetic modification. These findings could lay the basis for the development of fundamentally new and biological options for cardiac arrhythmia management.
© The Author 2016. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Adeno-associated virus vector; Anti-arrhythmic; Channelrhodopsin; Gene Therapy; Optogenetics; Ventricular arrhythmias

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28011703      PMCID: PMC5837774          DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehw574

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Heart J        ISSN: 0195-668X            Impact factor:   29.983


Introduction

Ventricular arrhythmias are a large and growing problem worldwide, with high annual mortality and morbidity rates. Despite significant progress in therapeutic strategies, the current treatment options for ventricular arrhythmias remain suboptimal. In brief, drug treatment is rather ineffective, while catheter ablation may cause irreversible complications and generally has a modest long-term efficiency. Electroshock therapy, on the other hand, is effective in terminating ventricular arrhythmias and has shown to reduce mortality as represented by the implantable cardiac defibrillator (ICD). However, the high-voltage shocks delivered by these devices are traumatizing, especially when given inappropriately, as they are associated not only with severe pain, anxiety and depression, but also with myocardial tissue damage. In contrast, optogenetics is an emerging biological technique to electrically modulate cells, tissue and organs in a specific, reversible and shock-free manner using light-gated ion channels. Thus, optogenetics may provide a new incentive for the development of biological and pain-free treatment options for cardiac arrhythmias. Recent studies have shown that cardiac optogenetics allows for optical pacing of the whole heart and light-induced arrhythmia termination in cell cultures. The aim of our present study was to investigate whether optogenetic modification of the adult rat heart would enable light-mediated termination of ventricular arrhythmias.

Methods

Experimental procedures are described in detail in Supplementary material online, .

Animal studies

All animal experiments were approved by the Animal Experiments Committee of the Leiden University Medical Centre and conformed to the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals as stated by the US National Institutes of Health.

Optogenetic pacing and arrhythmia termination

Four to six weeks after systemic injection of cardiotropic adeno-associated virus (AAV) vectors encoding red-activatable channelrhodopsin (ReaChR), the hearts of anesthetized adult Wistar rats were rapidly excised, cannulated and subsequently perfused using a Langendorff-apparatus (n = 8). Optical pacing was performed by exposure for 20 ms to 470-nm light-emitting diode (LED) light. Ventricular tachyarrhythmia’s (VTs) were induced by irregular electrical burst pacing protocols with a cycle length varying between 20 and 80 ms. When the VTs lasted for at least 5 s, they were considered sustained and the hearts were subsequently exposed to a 1000-ms light pulse. VTs were considered to be optogenetically terminated when ventricular arrhythmias stopped within 2 s after the start of illumination. When optogenetic termination failed, bipolar electrical defibrillation was performed (20 ms, 80 V, 12 mA). To evaluate the effect of action potential duration (APD) shortening on optogenetic terminaton efficiency, 3 µl of 10 mM of the KATP channel opener P1075 was directly injected into the aortic cannula. Following an incubation period of 1 min, the hearts were subjected to the same arrhythmia induction and optogenetic termination protocol as used prior to P1075 infusion. P1075 was considered washed out after 15 min following administration as APD was then normalized to standard values.

Results

Systemic delivery of cardiotropic AAV vectors encoding ReaChR resulted in widespread transduction of the cardiomyocytes in adult rat hearts with an average transduction rate of 93% (SD 4%) (Figure). Functionality of these light-gated depolarizing ion channels was confirmed by sharp-electrode measurements in cardiac tissue slices, revealing significant and sustained depolarization of the membrane potential during 470-nm LED illumination for 1000 ms (FigureB).
Figure 1

(A) Mid-ventricular transversal slice of an adult rat heart transduced with a cardiotropic AAV vector encoding ReaChR fused to citrine showing global transgene expression 6 weeks after vector injection. (B) Confirmation, by sharp-electrode measurement, of light-induced and sustained depolarization in a ReaChR-expressing ventricular tissue slice. (C) Schematic overview of a ReaChR-expressing heart in the Langendorff setup equipped for electrical stimulation and recording, in which the area of LED illumination and optical mapping are indicated by the blue and black dotted line, respectively. (D) Optical (top panel) and electrical (bottom panel) pacing of a ReaChR-expressing heart showing 1:1 capture with similar electrocardiographic signals for both modes of stimulation. (E) Typical intra-cardiac electrogram readouts demonstrating successful termination of a monomorphic (top panel) and polymorphic VT (middle panel) with a single 1000-ms local light pulse (blue line) onto the epicardial surface, while the arrhythmias are sustained without (bottom panel) such illumination (dotted black line). (F) Quantification of light-induced termination of mono- and polymorphic VTs expressed as a percentage of successful attempts averaged for all hearts (error bar represents one standard error of the mean) and of the average arrhythmia cycle length prior to illumination (error bar represents one standard deviation). (G) Electrical activation map of ReaChR-expressing heart, derived from voltage mapping, showing a reentrant conduction pattern. (H) Typical trace of optical voltage signals showing prolongation of the last voltage signal prior to VT termination by local epicardial illumination. (I) Quantification of APD80 and conduction velocity based on optical voltage signals at different stages of optogenetic arrhythmia termination (error bar represents one standard deviation). (J) The effect of the KATP channel opener P1075 on the APD80 and success of light-induced termination of mono- and polymorphic VTs, showing almost complete failure of optogenetic termination of VTs upon APD shorting by P1075 and recovery of photocurrent-mediated VT termination ability upon P1075 washout (error bar represents 1 SD).

(A) Mid-ventricular transversal slice of an adult rat heart transduced with a cardiotropic AAV vector encoding ReaChR fused to citrine showing global transgene expression 6 weeks after vector injection. (B) Confirmation, by sharp-electrode measurement, of light-induced and sustained depolarization in a ReaChR-expressing ventricular tissue slice. (C) Schematic overview of a ReaChR-expressing heart in the Langendorff setup equipped for electrical stimulation and recording, in which the area of LED illumination and optical mapping are indicated by the blue and black dotted line, respectively. (D) Optical (top panel) and electrical (bottom panel) pacing of a ReaChR-expressing heart showing 1:1 capture with similar electrocardiographic signals for both modes of stimulation. (E) Typical intra-cardiac electrogram readouts demonstrating successful termination of a monomorphic (top panel) and polymorphic VT (middle panel) with a single 1000-ms local light pulse (blue line) onto the epicardial surface, while the arrhythmias are sustained without (bottom panel) such illumination (dotted black line). (F) Quantification of light-induced termination of mono- and polymorphic VTs expressed as a percentage of successful attempts averaged for all hearts (error bar represents one standard error of the mean) and of the average arrhythmia cycle length prior to illumination (error bar represents one standard deviation). (G) Electrical activation map of ReaChR-expressing heart, derived from voltage mapping, showing a reentrant conduction pattern. (H) Typical trace of optical voltage signals showing prolongation of the last voltage signal prior to VT termination by local epicardial illumination. (I) Quantification of APD80 and conduction velocity based on optical voltage signals at different stages of optogenetic arrhythmia termination (error bar represents one standard deviation). (J) The effect of the KATP channel opener P1075 on the APD80 and success of light-induced termination of mono- and polymorphic VTs, showing almost complete failure of optogenetic termination of VTs upon APD shorting by P1075 and recovery of photocurrent-mediated VT termination ability upon P1075 washout (error bar represents 1 SD). Upon excision and preparation of the hearts in the Langendorff setup for stimulation and readout (FigureC), part of the epicardial surface was exposed to short (i.e. 20-ms) 470-nm light pulses (0.97 mW/mm2). This allowed optical pacing up to 4.5 Hz, thereby producing QRS complexes similar to those induced by electrical stimulation (FigureD). Following the induction of sustained VTs by electrical burst pacing, a single 470-nm light pulse (1000 ms, 2.97 mW/mm2) was given illuminating circa 125 mm2 of the ventricular surface. Such pulses led to an average successful arrhythmia termination rate of 97% for monomorphic VTs (corresponding to 26 VTs in 8 hearts) and 57% of polymorphic VTs (corresponding to 19 VTs in 6 hearts). (). Without illumination, none of these arrhythmias were terminated (n = 6 for both mono- and polymorphic VTs) (FigureE and F). Optical voltage mapping was performed in order to obtain more mechanistic insight into light-induced arrhythmia termination. Activation maps confirmed global high-frequency activation of the ventricles resembling reentrant activity (FigureG). Optical recordings showed that the 1000-ms light pulses resulted in arrhythmia termination within 420.9 ms (SD 189.7 ms, range 185–734 ms). Furthermore, based on the optical signals, significant prolongation of APD was noted just before arrhythmia termination (58.6 ms (SD 7.3 ms) vs. 72.3 ms (SD 16.3 ms) for APD80 before and during illumination, P = 0.021, n = 7). (FigureH and I). As this finding indicated an important role for APD prolongation in optogenetic arrhythmia termination in these hearts, we next evaluated the effects of APD shortening on termination efficiency. For this purpose, the optogenetically modified hearts were treated with a single bolus of P1075, a KATP channel opener (n = 2). As a result, APD80 during the arrhythmia was significantly shortened (62.9 ms (SD 11.8 ms) vs. 44.0 ms (SD 13.7 ms) before and after P1075 administration, P = 0.018). Using the same arrhythmia induction and optogenetic termination protocol, none of monomorphic VTs (0 out of 5) and only 1 out of 9 (11%) polymorphic VTs could be terminated. After a washout period of 15 min, and normalization of APD80, optogenetic termination efficiency increased to 80% for monomorphic VTs (4 out of 5) and 71% for polymorphic VTs (5 out of 6) (FigureJ).

Discussion

Here, we demonstrate that forced expression of a light-gated depolarizing ion channel (ReaChR) in the adult rat heart allows contact- and shock-free termination of VTs through brief local illumination of the ventricular surface, i.e. without relying on conventional drugs, tissue ablation or electroshocks. Both mono- and polymorphic VTs could be terminated in an effective and repetitive manner by a light-induced electrical current driven by natural electrochemical gradients, providing proof-of-concept for biological arrhythmia termination. The unique properties of optogenetics make it possible to modulate cardiac electrical activity by applying depolarizing or hyperpolarizing photocurrents with high specificity and unmatched spatiotemporal precision. The finding that optogenetic arrhythmia termination is feasible in the intact heart could have an impact on the development of novel treatment options for cardiac arrhythmias, as there may be several advantages of biological anti-arrhythmic therapy over conventional therapy. These advantages could relate to the specificity of the intervention, which is superb for optogenetics and relatively poor for drugs. In addition, optogenetic interventions allow temporary modulation of electrical function, as opposed to tissue ablation, which results in permanent alteration of the electrical properties of cardiac tissue. Importantly, optogenetic arrhythmia termination obviates the use of high-voltage electroshocks. These shocks are not only known to be painful and to cause anxiety and stress in a significant percentage of patients wearing an ICD2, but also to cause myocardial tissue damage. In theory, these disadvantages could be avoided if the heart itself would be able to generate, on cue, the electrical current for arrhythmia termination, as with cardiac optogenetics. Obviously, many hurdles need to be overcome before clinical translation can be considered, but the concept of biological arrhythmia management seems worth further investigation considering the unique potential benefits. Our data suggests that APD prolongation plays an important role in optogenetic arrhythmia termination. Such prolongation has been associated with destabilization of arrhythmic electrical activity, thereby favouring its termination. However, as the exact mechanisms remain incompletely understood, further studies are needed in order to improve mechanistic insight, including evaluation of the minimum requirements for effective optogenetic termination, such as strength, area, and location of illumination. Moreover, further development and optimization of optogenetic tools and light delivery would help to improve optogenetic termination efficiency and, together with advances in gene transfer technology, will potentially aid the translation to in vivo applications. It is expected that potential in vivo applications are hindered by poor light penetration, and that therefore only a small fraction of the total number of light-gated ion channels would be activated. An important finding of this study is that light-induced arrhythmia termination was already successful by illuminating only a small area of the epicardial surface. This finding at least suggests that it may not be necessary to illuminate the whole heart. Hence, the challenging aspect of illumination might be overcome by focusing the light on a relatively small, but in terms of arrhythmia maintenance, critical area. In addition, this finding also suggests that regional genetic modification by local delivery of viral vectors, or optogenetically modified cells into cardiac tissue may already be sufficient for effective optogenetic modulation, which would be of practical benefit. Furthermore, as heart size may play an important role in determining the efficiency of arrhythmia termination via optogenetics, further studies in larger hearts are needed. Taken together, our study demonstrates that the heart itself is able to produce an electrical current for arrhythmia termination upon forced expression of light-gated depolarizing ion channels and their activation by brief and local epicardial illumination. Such biological arrhythmia termination enables precise and shock-free control over disturbed cardiac rhythm, allowing normal rhythm to regain. Although further and more detailed studies are certainly needed, the findings presented in this brief communication do provide proof-of-principle for optogenetic termination of arrhythmias in the whole heart and may thereby pave the way for the design and development of fundamentally novel strategies of cardiac arrhythmia management.

Supplementary material

Supplementary material is available at European Heart Journal online. Click here for additional data file.
  16 in total

1.  Instability and triangulation of the action potential predict serious proarrhythmia, but action potential duration prolongation is antiarrhythmic.

Authors:  L M Hondeghem; L Carlsson; G Duker
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2001-04-17       Impact factor: 29.690

2.  Myocardial injury secondary to ICD shocks: insights from patients with lead fracture.

Authors:  Raed Abu Sham'a; Pablo Nery; Mouhannad Sadek; Derek Yung; Calum Redpath; Mark Perrin; Bradley Sarak; David Birnie
Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol       Date:  2013-09-02       Impact factor: 1.976

3.  Targeted modification of atrial electrophysiology by homogeneous transmural atrial gene transfer.

Authors:  Kan Kikuchi; Amy D McDonald; Tetsuo Sasano; J Kevin Donahue
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2005-01-10       Impact factor: 29.690

4.  Systemic gene transfer enables optogenetic pacing of mouse hearts.

Authors:  Christoph C Vogt; Tobias Bruegmann; Daniela Malan; Annika Ottersbach; Wilhelm Roell; Bernd K Fleischmann; Philipp Sasse
Journal:  Cardiovasc Res       Date:  2015-01-12       Impact factor: 10.787

Review 5.  The prevalence of anxiety and depression in adults with implantable cardioverter defibrillators: a systematic review.

Authors:  Gina Magyar-Russell; Brett D Thombs; Jennifer X Cai; Tarun Baveja; Emily A Kuhl; Preet Paul Singh; Marcela Montenegro Braga Barroso; Erin Arthurs; Michelle Roseman; Nivee Amin; Joseph E Marine; Roy C Ziegelstein
Journal:  J Psychosom Res       Date:  2011-04-20       Impact factor: 3.006

6.  Optogenetic defibrillation terminates ventricular arrhythmia in mouse hearts and human simulations.

Authors:  Tobias Bruegmann; Patrick M Boyle; Christoph C Vogt; Thomas V Karathanos; Hermenegild J Arevalo; Bernd K Fleischmann; Natalia A Trayanova; Philipp Sasse
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2016-09-12       Impact factor: 14.808

Review 7.  Ventricular arrhythmias and sudden cardiac death.

Authors:  Roy M John; Usha B Tedrow; Bruce A Koplan; Christine M Albert; Laurence M Epstein; Michael O Sweeney; Amy Leigh Miller; Gregory F Michaud; William G Stevenson
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2012-10-27       Impact factor: 79.321

8.  Optogenetics.

Authors:  Karl Deisseroth
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2010-12-20       Impact factor: 28.547

9.  ReaChR: a red-shifted variant of channelrhodopsin enables deep transcranial optogenetic excitation.

Authors:  John Y Lin; Per Magne Knutsen; Arnaud Muller; David Kleinfeld; Roger Y Tsien
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2013-09-01       Impact factor: 24.884

10.  A comprehensive multiscale framework for simulating optogenetics in the heart.

Authors:  Patrick M Boyle; John C Williams; Christina M Ambrosi; Emilia Entcheva; Natalia A Trayanova
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 14.919

View more
  31 in total

1.  Observing and Manipulating Cell-Specific Cardiac Function with Light.

Authors:  Callum M Zgierski-Johnston; Franziska Schneider-Warme
Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol       Date:  2021       Impact factor: 2.622

2.  Arrhythmias: Optogenetic control of cardiac rhythm.

Authors:  Dario Ummarino
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2017-01-19       Impact factor: 32.419

Review 3.  The power of optogenetics : Potential in cardiac experimental and clinical electrophysiology.

Authors:  Franziska Schneider-Warme
Journal:  Herzschrittmacherther Elektrophysiol       Date:  2018-01-05

Review 4.  Cardiac optogenetics: a decade of enlightenment.

Authors:  Emilia Entcheva; Matthew W Kay
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2020-12-18       Impact factor: 32.419

5.  Modulation of Light Energy Transfer from Chromophore to Protein in the Channelrhodopsin ReaChR.

Authors:  Joel C D Kaufmann; Benjamin S Krause; Suliman Adam; Eglof Ritter; Igor Schapiro; Peter Hegemann; Franz J Bartl
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2020-07-10       Impact factor: 4.033

6.  Near-infrared light driven tissue-penetrating cardiac optogenetics via upconversion nanoparticles in vivo.

Authors:  Panpan Rao; Long Wang; Yue Cheng; Xi Wang; Haitao Li; Guoxing Zheng; Zile Li; Chan Jiang; Qing Zhou; Congxin Huang
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2020-02-18       Impact factor: 3.732

Review 7.  Cardiac Optogenetics: 2018.

Authors:  Patrick M Boyle; Thomas V Karathanos; Natalia A Trayanova
Journal:  JACC Clin Electrophysiol       Date:  2018-02-01

Review 8.  Electroimmunology and cardiac arrhythmia.

Authors:  Jana Grune; Masahiro Yamazoe; Matthias Nahrendorf
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2021-03-02       Impact factor: 32.419

9.  Termination of re-entrant atrial tachycardia via optogenetic stimulation with optimized spatial targeting: insights from computational models.

Authors:  Patrick M Boyle; Michael J Murphy; Thomas V Karathanos; Sohail Zahid; Robert C Blake; Natalia A Trayanova
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2017-12-28       Impact factor: 5.182

10.  Optogenetic modulation of cardiac action potential properties may prevent arrhythmogenesis in short and long QT syndromes.

Authors:  Amit Gruber; Oded Edri; Irit Huber; Gil Arbel; Amira Gepstein; Assad Shiti; Naim Shaheen; Snizhana Chorna; Michal Landesberg; Lior Gepstein
Journal:  JCI Insight       Date:  2021-06-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.