| Literature DB >> 28008952 |
Marthe T C Walvoort1, Chiara Testa2,3, Raya Eilam4, Rina Aharoni5, Francesca Nuti2,6, Giada Rossi2,3, Feliciana Real-Fernandez2,3, Roberta Lanzillo7, Vincenzo Brescia Morra7, Francesco Lolli8, Paolo Rovero2,3, Barbara Imperiali1, Anna Maria Papini2,6,9.
Abstract
In <span class="Disease">autoimmune diseases, there have been proposals that exogenous “molecular triggers”, i.e., specific ‘non-self antigens’ accompanying infectious agents, might disrupt control of the adaptive immune system resulting in <span class="Chemical">serious pathologies. The etiology of multiple sclerosis (MS) remains unclear. However, epidemiologic data suggest that exposure to infectious agents may be associated with increased MS risk and progression may be linked to exogenous, bacterially-derived, antigenic molecules, mimicking mammalian cell surface glycoconjugates triggering autoimmune responses. Previously, antibodies specific to a gluco-asparagine (N-Glc) glycopeptide, CSF114(N-Glc), were identified in sera of an MS patient subpopulation. Since the human glycoproteome repertoire lacks this uniquely modified amino acid, we turned our attention to bacteria, i.e., Haemophilus influenzae, expressing cell-surface adhesins including N-Glc, to establish a connection between H. influenzae infection and MS. We exploited the biosynthetic machinery from the opportunistic pathogen H. influenzae (and the homologous enzymes from A. pleuropneumoniae) to produce a unique set of defined glucosylated adhesin proteins. Interestingly we revealed that a hyperglucosylated protein domain, based on the cell-surface adhesin HMW1A, is preferentially recognized by antibodies from sera of an MS patient subpopulation. In conclusion the hyperglucosylated adhesin is the first example of an N-glucosylated native antigen that can be considered a relevant candidate for triggering pathogenic antibodies in MS.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 28008952 PMCID: PMC5180199 DOI: 10.1038/srep39430
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1Schematic representation of the enzymatic reaction and putative N-glucosylation sites on HMW1ct.
(a) Structure of CSF114(N-Glc). (b) Glucosylation of Asn in the consensus senquence NX(S/T), catalyzed by HMW1C, (PDB: 3Q3H). (c) Schematic representation of HMW1A, displaying the extended signal peptide (SP), pre-protein (PP), mature HMW1A, and the HMW1ct fragment (magnification is an I-TASSER2930 model of HMW1ct, with glycosylation sites 1, 2, 5, 6 in magenta, and remaining sites in blue).
Figure 2Data distribution of measured SP-ELISA absorbances.
(a) Total IgM and (b) IgG titers in 126 MS patient sera detected by SP-ELISA, comparison between the antigen I(Glc), and the non-glucosylated analog I. (c) Total IgM and (d) IgG titers in 112 NBD sera detected by SP-ELISA, comparison between I(Glc) antigen and the non-glucosylated analog I. MS patient and NBD sera selected for the detailed analysis are marked as red dots and circles.
Calculated pIC50 values for inhibitors of anti-I(Glc).
| Inhibitors | MS Sera | NBD sera | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MS1 | MS2 | MS3 | MS4 | MS5 | NBD1 | NBD2 | NBD3 | NBD4 | |
| I(Glc) | 8.65 ± 0.10 | 8.09 ± 0.56 | 7.98 ± 0.26 | 7.57 ± 0.16 | 7.67 ± 0.28 | 7.20 ± 0.29 | 6.92 ± 0.30 | 6.37 ± 0.52 | 6.83 ± 0.26 |
| I | <5.0 | <5.0 | <5.0 | 7.87 ± 0.24 | <5.0 | 6.86 ± 0.37 | 7.84 ± 0.42 | 5.92 ± 0.52 | 7.09 ± 0.26 |
Values are reported as calculated pIC50 ± the standard error (SEM) in 5 representative MS and 4 NBD sera.
Figure 3Immunoaffinity purification of antibodies from one representative NBD and one MS serum.
(a) Schematic process of antibody fractionation. (b) SP-ELISA of antibody fractions obtained from two sequential sepharose columns bearing the immobilized non-glucosylated I and hyperglucosylated I(Glc). Antigen I designated as solid bars and antigen I(Glc) designated as gray bars. In the case of NBD serum, flow through 1 (FT1) and eluted fraction 2 (Elu2) were collected. In the case of MS serum, flow through 1 (FT1), eluted fraction 2 (Elu2), flow through 3 (FT3), eluted fraction 4 (Elu4) were collected. Each point is mean ± s.d. for n = 3 independent experiments. The ELISA absorbance in serum can be explained considering that IgG concentration in the whole sera (10 mg/ml) is 300 times higher than in eluted fractions (0.03 mg/ml).
Calculated pIC50 values for inhibitors toward anti-CSF114(N-Glc) IgG antibodies.
| Inhibitor | MS1 | MS2 | MS3 | MS4 | MS5 | Mean value | 95% C.I. | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 9.27 ± 0.07 | 8.88 ± 0.15 | 8.42 ± 0.28 | 9.34 ± 0.19 | 9.45 ± 0.16 | 9.07 ± 0.42 | 8.547–9.597 | ||
| 8.59 ± 0.04 | 8.93 ± 0.18 | 9.94 ± 0.19 | 9.34 ± 0.10 | 9.77 ± 0.20 | 9.31 ± 0.56 | 8.614–10.01 | ||
| 8.71 ± 0.11 | 8.28 ± 0.15 | 9.34 ± 0.38 | 9.25 ± 0.12 | 8.89 ± 0.08 | 8.89 ± 0.43 | 8.361–9.427 | ||
| 10.14 ± 0.03 | 8.26 ± 0.08 | not tested | not tested | 8.56 ± 0.27 | 8.99 ± 1.01 | 6.478–11.50 | ||
| 7.59 ± 0.16 | 7.21 ± 0.07 | 6.69 ± 0.14 | 6.89 ± 0.05 | 7.56 ± 0.27 | 7.19 ± 0.40 | 6.692–7.684 | ||
| <6.0 | <6.0 | <6.0 | <6.0 | <6.0 | n.a. | n.a. | ||
| <6.0 | <6.0 | <6.0 | <6.0 | <6.0 | n.a. | n.a. | ||
| <6.0 | 6.80 ± 0.23 | <6.0 | 6.17 ± 1.06 | 6.44 ± 0.73 | 6.47 ± 0.32 | 5.685–7.255 | ||
| <6.0 | <6.0 | not tested | not tested | <6.0 | n.a. | n.a. | ||
| <6.0 | <6.0 | 6.41 ± 0.44 | <6.0 | <6.0 | n.a. | n.a. | ||
| 7.25 ± 0.07 | 7.17 ± 0.09 | 8.05 ± 0.26 | 7.69 ± 0.14 | 7.66 ± 0.53 | 7.56 ± 0.36 | 7.118–8.010 |
Values are reported as calculated pIC50 ± the standard error (SEM) of the N-glucosylated adhesin antigens (I(Glc)-V(Glc)) and the corresponding non-glucosylated analogs (I-V) used as inhibitors of anti-CSF114(N-Glc) antibodies in 5 representative MS sera.
*95% confidence interval (C.I.).
Figure 4Immunofluorescent staining of mouse spinal cord sections by anti-I(Glc) antibodies.
Coronal lumbar spinal cord sections from naïve mice as well as from mice inflicted with experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE, grade 4, three weeks after disease induction), were incubated with: (a) anti-I(Glc) antibodies from a representative MS patient serum, (b) Total IgG fraction from a normal donor (NBD). Binding to the spinal cord tissue was indicated by fluorescent labeling with anti-human antibody (red). Note that the positive staining of anti-I(Glc) antibodies overlaps the myelin depicted by staining with antibody to myelin basic protein (MBP, green). Staining by anti-I(Glc) antibodies is lost in the spinal-cord white matter (WM) of EAE-mice, at sites of inflammation (depicted by Hoechst nuclear staining of the infiltrating cells, blue), in parallel to the demyelination. Anti-I(Glc) antibody binding is restricted to the spinal cord WM while no staining is observed in the gray matter (GM) or in the periphery ventral roots (VR). Arrows depict inflammatory sites in sections of EAE mice. The linear structures stained at the center of gray matter (a) are non-relevant staining resulting from folds in the tissue.
Figure 5A higher magnification of the white matter taken from the different sections in Fig. 4, showing in further detail the immunofluorescent staining by anti-I(Glc) antibodies.
Coronal lumbar spinal cord sections from naïve mice as well as from mice inflicted with experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE, grade 4, three weeks after disease induction), were incubated with: (a) anti-I(Glc) antibodies from a representative MS patient serum, (b) Total IgG fraction from a normal donor (NBD). Binding to the spinal cord tissue was indicated by fluorescent labeling with anti-human antibody (red). Note that the positive staining of anti-I(Glc) antibodies overlaps with the myelin depicted by staining with antibody to myelin basic protein (MBP, green). Staining by anti-I(Glc) antibodies is lost in spinal cords of EAE-mice, at sites of inflammation (depicted by Hoechst nuclear staining of the infiltrating cells, blue), in parallel to the demyelination.