Literature DB >> 28008467

Readmissions after laparoscopic cholecystectomy in a UK District General Hospital.

Olugbenga Awolaran1,2, Tabitha Gana3, Nehemiah Samuel3, Kenneth Oaikhinan3.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is the gold standard for the treatment of symptomatic gallstones and its practice as day case where possible is considered the standard over the last decade. However, readmission after surgery is recognised as a new problem. AIM: The aim of this cohort observational study was to investigate the readmission rate in a district general hospital and identify the causes of readmission in order to explore ways by which this can be reduced or managed more cost effectively.
METHOD: Records of patients who had laparoscopic cholecystectomy over 6 months were retrospectively searched. Patients returning to hospital due to symptoms within 30 days of elective and emergency laparoscopic cholecystectomy were included.
RESULTS: Three hundred and twenty-eight laparoscopic cholecystectomies were performed within the 6-month period. Twenty-two patients returned within 30 days of surgery making a readmission rate of 6.7%. Reasons for inpatient admission were abdominal pain without any underlying cause 10 (45.5%), wound infection 5 (22.7%), leg swelling 2 (9%), retained stone 1 (4.5%), bile leak 1 (4.5%), pneumonia 1 (4.5%), iatrogenic bowel injury 1 (4.5%) and back pain 1 (4.5%). Readmission rate decreased with longer duration of stay in hospital during primary admission, and 64% of patients returned to the hospital within 7 days of procedure. 50% of patients who returned with abdominal pain without any identifiable cause had a longstanding history of conditions involving chronic pain.
CONCLUSION: While the feared intra-abdominal complications of cholecystectomy often come to mind when assessing patients presenting with abdominal pain after surgery, non-specific abdominal pain is consistently shown to be several times more likely. A combination of patient factors and pain control techniques account for this pain. Effective multimodal pain management approach and community primary health care support in the early post-operative period could reduce readmission, save cost and improve patient experience.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Abdominal pain; Cholecystectomy; Laparoscopy; Readmission

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 28008467     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-016-5380-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  10 in total

1.  A 5-year analysis of readmissions following elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy - cohort study.

Authors:  P Sanjay; R Weerakoon; I A Shaikh; T Bird; A Paily; S Yalamarthi
Journal:  Int J Surg       Date:  2010-09-15       Impact factor: 6.071

2.  Early hospital readmission after laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  Gurcan Simsek; Adil Kartal; Baris Sevinc; Halil I Tasci; Serhat Dogan
Journal:  Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 1.719

Review 3.  Wound infiltration with local anaesthetic agents for laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  Sofronis Loizides; Kurinchi Selvan Gurusamy; Myura Nagendran; Michele Rossi; Gian Piero Guerrini; Brian R Davidson
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2014-03-12

4.  Thirty percent of patients have moderate to severe pain 24 hr after ambulatory surgery: a survey of 5,703 patients.

Authors:  Brid McGrath; Hany Elgendy; Frances Chung; Damon Kamming; Bruna Curti; Shirley King
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 5.063

5.  Effect of Pain Medication Choice on Emergency Room Visits for Pain after Ambulatory Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy.

Authors:  Vemuru Sunil K Reddy; Joshua D Brown; Benson S Ku; Brian F Gilchrist; Daniel T Farkas
Journal:  Am Surg       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 0.688

6.  Is early laparoscopic cholecystectomy safe after the "safe period"?

Authors:  Tahir Farooq; Gordon Buchanan; Vijay Manda; Robin Kennedy; Jonathan Ockrim
Journal:  J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 1.878

Review 7.  A meta-analysis of ambulatory versus inpatient laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  N Z Ahmad; G Byrnes; S A Naqvi
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2008-04-09       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Introduction of a day-case laparoscopic cholecystectomy service in the UK: a critical analysis of factors influencing same-day discharge and contact with primary care providers.

Authors:  C D Briggs; G B Irving; C D Mann; A Cresswell; L Englert; M Peterson; I C Cameron
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2009-06-25       Impact factor: 1.891

9.  Postoperative Symptoms, after-care, and return to routine activity after laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  Anand P Tamhankar; Fayyaz Mazari; Jide Olubaniyi; Nick Everitt; Krish Ravi
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2010 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 2.172

Review 10.  Intraperitoneal local anaesthetic instillation versus no intraperitoneal local anaesthetic instillation for laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  Kurinchi Selvan Gurusamy; Myura Nagendran; Gian Piero Guerrini; Clare D Toon; Murat Zinnuroglu; Brian R Davidson
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2014-03-13
  10 in total
  2 in total

1.  The protocol of low-impact laparoscopic cholecystectomy: the combination of mini-laparoscopy and low-pressure pneumoperitoneum.

Authors:  Nicola de'Angelis; Niccoló Petrucciani; Giusy Giannandrea; Francesco Brunetti
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2018-08-29

2.  Readmissions after cholecystectomy in a tertiary UK centre: Incidence, causes and burden.

Authors:  Islam Omar; Ahmed Hafez
Journal:  J Minim Access Surg       Date:  2022 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 1.407

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.