Literature DB >> 20804872

A 5-year analysis of readmissions following elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy - cohort study.

P Sanjay1, R Weerakoon, I A Shaikh, T Bird, A Paily, S Yalamarthi.   

Abstract

AIMS: This study aimed to determine readmission rates, causes for readmission and outcomes for patients undergoing elective Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy (LC) without intraoperative cholangiogram (IOC).
METHODS: Timing related to readmissions was grouped as <6 weeks, 6 weeks-1 year, 1-2 years and >2 years. Outcomes and variables related to readmission were evaluated.
RESULTS: 101 readmissions (6.6) were noted amongst 1523 consecutive LC. The median follow up was 4 years (range 1.6-6.4 years). There was no difference in the median age (48 vs. 53 years, P = 0.2) and sex of the patients between the readmitted and no readmission groups. The incidence of readmissions (n = 101) within the first 6 weeks, 6 weeks-1 year, 1-2 years and >2 years were 2.8%, 1.5%, 1.4% and 0.7% respectively. The most common reasons for readmissions were non-specific abdominal pain (NSAP) (36%), obstructive jaundice (14%), peptic ulcer disease (10%), intra-abdominal collection (4%) and bile leak (3%), pancreatitis (3%), and other reasons (30%). Overall, 24 (22%) of readmissions were related to biliary problems, the majority of these occurred (15/24, 63%) within 6 weeks of LC. The incidence of retained stones within the first 6 weeks, 6 weeks-1 year, 1-2 years and >2 years were 0.4%, 0.3%, 0.1% and 0% respectively. Overall 14 (14%) patients were readmitted with retained stones and all were managed by ERCP & ductal clearance.
CONCLUSIONS: Readmission rate following elective LC is low with the majority occurring within the first 6 weeks and only a quarter of these related are directly to biliary pathology. In the absence of routine IOC, around 1% of patients present with retained stones within 2 years of LC. A small fraction of patients continue to suffer from NSAP and should be warned prior to the surgery. Copyright Â
© 2010 Surgical Associates Ltd. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20804872     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2010.08.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Surg        ISSN: 1743-9159            Impact factor:   6.071


  6 in total

Review 1.  General and vascular surgery readmissions: a systematic review.

Authors:  Jason T Wiseman; Amanda M Guzman; Sara Fernandes-Taylor; Travis L Engelbert; R Scott Saunders; K Craig Kent
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2014-05-22       Impact factor: 6.113

2.  Readmissions after laparoscopic cholecystectomy in a UK District General Hospital.

Authors:  Olugbenga Awolaran; Tabitha Gana; Nehemiah Samuel; Kenneth Oaikhinan
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-12-23       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 3.  Surgeon-performed point-of-care ultrasound for acute cholecystitis: indications and limitations: a European Society for Trauma and Emergency Surgery (ESTES) consensus statement.

Authors:  Jorge Pereira; Gary A Bass; Diego Mariani; Bogdan D Dumbrava; Andrea Casamassima; António Rodrigues da Silva; Luis Pinheiro; Isidro Martinez-Casas; Mauro Zago
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2019-08-21       Impact factor: 3.693

4.  Ninety-day readmissions after inpatient cholecystectomy: A 5-year analysis.

Authors:  Alba Manuel-Vázquez; Raquel Latorre-Fragua; Carmen Ramiro-Pérez; Aylhin López-Marcano; Farah Al-Shwely; Roberto De la Plaza-Llamas; José Manuel Ramia
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2017-04-28       Impact factor: 5.742

5.  Increased Risk of Peptic Ulcers Following a Cholecystectomy for Gallstones.

Authors:  Ming-Chieh Tsai; Chung-Chien Huang; Li-Ting Kao; Herng-Ching Lin; Cha-Ze Lee
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-07-29       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Readmissions after cholecystectomy in a tertiary UK centre: Incidence, causes and burden.

Authors:  Islam Omar; Ahmed Hafez
Journal:  J Minim Access Surg       Date:  2022 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 1.407

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.