Literature DB >> 19489677

Is early laparoscopic cholecystectomy safe after the "safe period"?

Tahir Farooq1, Gordon Buchanan, Vijay Manda, Robin Kennedy, Jonathan Ockrim.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Early laparoscopic cholecystectomy (ELC) in acute cholecystitis improves hospital stay and outcome. Operative difficulty is said to increase with delay, and surgery is usually advised within 3 days of presentation. It can be difficult to accommodate all these patients within 3 days; this study evaluates results within and after this "safe period."
MATERIALS AND METHODS: In total, 137 patients (male:female 45:92) presenting as an emergency due to acute cholecystitis over 45 months from August 1, 2003, who then underwent ELC with an on-table cholangiogram (OTC) or laparoscopic ultrasound were prospectively studied. Outcome was compared between those who underwent surgery within 72 hours (group 1) or after 72 hours (group 2).
RESULTS: There were 87 patients in group 1 versus 50 in group 2. There was no significant difference with reference to ASA grading, length of operation (median 90 vs. 90 minutes; P = 1.000), conversion rates (7 vs. 10%; P = 0.523), median postoperative stay (2 vs. 3 days; P = 0.203), or 30-day readmission rates [5/87 [6%] vs. 3/50 [6%]; P = 1.000] between groups, respectively. There was no mortality. One patient had a biliary leak from a duct of Lushka in group 2, which settled after endoscopic stenting.
CONCLUSION: In experienced hands, ELC is safe even after 72 hours.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19489677     DOI: 10.1089/lap.2008.0363

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A        ISSN: 1092-6429            Impact factor:   1.878


  7 in total

Review 1.  Early laparoscopic cholecystectomy is superior to delayed acute cholecystitis: a meta-analysis of case-control studies.

Authors:  Amy M Cao; Guy D Eslick; Michael R Cox
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-07-03       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 2.  Surgical management of acute cholecystitis.

Authors:  Rahul S Koti; Christopher J Davidson; Brian R Davidson
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2015-05-14       Impact factor: 3.445

3.  Comparison of laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis within and beyond 72 h of symptom onset during emergency admissions.

Authors:  Bin Zhu; Zhanzhi Zhang; Yan Wang; Ke Gong; Yiping Lu; Nengwei Zhang
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 3.352

4.  Low ninety-day re-admission rates after emergency and elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy in a district general hospital.

Authors:  Sue K Down; Marko Nicolic; Hibba Abdulkarim; Nick Skelton; Adrian H Harris; Yashwant Koak
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 1.891

5.  Readmissions after laparoscopic cholecystectomy in a UK District General Hospital.

Authors:  Olugbenga Awolaran; Tabitha Gana; Nehemiah Samuel; Kenneth Oaikhinan
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-12-23       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Comparison of clinical result between early laparoscopic cholecystectomy and delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy after percutaneous transhepatic gallbladder drainage for patients with complicated acute cholecystitis.

Authors:  Jae Woo Choi; Sin Hui Park; Sang Yong Choi; Haeng Soo Kim; Taeg Hyun Kim
Journal:  Korean J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg       Date:  2012-11-30

7.  Comparison of emergency cholecystectomy and delayed cholecystectomy after percutaneous transhepatic gallbladder drainage in patients with acute cholecystitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Shao-Zhuo Huang; Hao-Qi Chen; Wei-Xin Liao; Wen-Ying Zhou; Jie-Huan Chen; Wen-Chao Li; Hui Zhou; Bo Liu; Kun-Peng Hu
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2020-10-13
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.