Literature DB >> 28008192

The long-term results and changing patterns of biological valves at the mitral position in contemporary practice in Japan.

Tomonobu Abe1, Hideki Ito1, Masato Mutsuga1, Kazuro Fujimoto1, Sachie Terazawa1, Yuji Narita1, Hideki Oshima1, Akihiko Usui1.   

Abstract

Mitral valve surgery has changed with the wide acceptance of mitral valve repair. The aim of this study is to obtain the long-term results of patients who underwent mitral valve replacement (MVR) using a biological prosthesis in contemporary practice in Japan. From January 1990 to December 2013, 76 patients underwent MVR using a biological prosthesis with or without concomitant surgery. Data were obtained by means of a questionnaire and a telephone interview. The mean follow-up period was 4.26 years. The etiologies of the patients included dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) (n=20 [26.3%]), ischemic mitral regurgitation (n=7 [9.2%]). There is a trend towards decreasing number of rheumatic and degenerative disease and increasing number of DCM and ischemic mitral regurgitation. Three patients (3.9%) died in the perioperative period. The 5- and 10-year overall survival rates were 69.6% and 31.7%, respectively. The 5- and 10-year freedom from valve related death were 95.6% and 80.6 %, respectively. The linearized rates of valve-related complications were as follows: thromboembolism (0.63%/patient/year), bleeding (1.25%/patient/year). One patient underwent reoperation for structural degeneration 13 years after the first operation. The present study shows the long-term results of mitral valve replacement with bioproshtesis in a contemporary case series. The practice pattern is changing. The low rate of valve-related complication justify the current patient selection.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Imitral valve replacement; biological prosthesis; long-term results

Year:  2016        PMID: 28008192      PMCID: PMC5159462          DOI: 10.18999/nagjms.78.4.369

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nagoya J Med Sci        ISSN: 0027-7622            Impact factor:   1.131


  8 in total

1.  Guidelines for reporting mortality and morbidity after cardiac valve interventions.

Authors:  Cary W Akins; D Craig Miller; Marko I Turina; Nicholas T Kouchoukos; Eugene H Blackstone; Gary L Grunkemeier; Johanna J M Takkenberg; Tirone E David; Eric G Butchart; David H Adams; David M Shahian; Siegfried Hagl; John E Mayer; Bruce W Lytle
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 5.209

2.  Fifteen-year experience with the mitral Carpentier-Edwards PERIMOUNT pericardial bioprosthesis.

Authors:  M A Marchand; M R Aupart; R Norton; I R Goldsmith; L C Pelletier; M Pellerin; T Dubiel; W J Daenen; P Herijgers; F P Casselman; M P Holden; T E David
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 4.330

3.  Trends in mitral valve surgery in a large multi-surgeon, multi-hospital practice, 1979-1999.

Authors:  William F Northrup; Vibhu R Kshettry; Karen A DuBois
Journal:  J Heart Valve Dis       Date:  2003-01

Review 4.  Mitral valve disease: if the mitral valve is not reparable/failed repair, is bioprosthesis suitable for replacement?

Authors:  William Robert Eric Jamieson; Virginia M Gudas; Lawrence H Burr; Michael T Janusz; Guy J Fradet; Hilton Ling; Eva Germann; Samuel V Lichtenstein
Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2008-12-03       Impact factor: 4.191

5.  Twenty-year results of the Hancock II bioprosthesis.

Authors:  Michael A Borger; Joan Ivanov; Susan Armstrong; Debbie Christie-Hrybinsky; Christopher M Feindel; Tirone E David
Journal:  J Heart Valve Dis       Date:  2006-01

6.  Valve repair improves the outcome of surgery for mitral regurgitation. A multivariate analysis.

Authors:  M Enriquez-Sarano; H V Schaff; T A Orszulak; A J Tajik; K R Bailey; R L Frye
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1995-02-15       Impact factor: 29.690

7.  Very late outcomes for mitral valve replacement with the Carpentier-Edwards pericardial bioprosthesis: 25-year follow-up of 450 implantations.

Authors:  Thierry Bourguignon; Anne-Lorraine Bouquiaux-Stablo; Claudia Loardi; Alain Mirza; Pascal Candolfi; Michel Marchand; Michel R Aupart
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2014-02-20       Impact factor: 5.209

8.  Mitral-valve repair versus replacement for severe ischemic mitral regurgitation.

Authors:  Michael A Acker; Michael K Parides; Louis P Perrault; Alan J Moskowitz; Annetine C Gelijns; Pierre Voisine; Peter K Smith; Judy W Hung; Eugene H Blackstone; John D Puskas; Michael Argenziano; James S Gammie; Michael Mack; Deborah D Ascheim; Emilia Bagiella; Ellen G Moquete; T Bruce Ferguson; Keith A Horvath; Nancy L Geller; Marissa A Miller; Y Joseph Woo; David A D'Alessandro; Gorav Ailawadi; Francois Dagenais; Timothy J Gardner; Patrick T O'Gara; Robert E Michler; Irving L Kron
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2013-11-18       Impact factor: 91.245

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.