Literature DB >> 24667021

Very late outcomes for mitral valve replacement with the Carpentier-Edwards pericardial bioprosthesis: 25-year follow-up of 450 implantations.

Thierry Bourguignon1, Anne-Lorraine Bouquiaux-Stablo2, Claudia Loardi2, Alain Mirza2, Pascal Candolfi3, Michel Marchand2, Michel R Aupart2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the present study was to evaluate the very-long-term results of the Carpentier-Edwards pericardial bioprosthesis in the mitral position.
METHODS: From 1984 to 2011, 450 Carpentier-Edwards PERIMOUNT pericardial mitral bioprostheses were implanted in 404 consecutive patients (mean age, 68 years; 53% female). Patients undergoing multiple valve replacements were excluded. The clinical, operative, and follow-up data were prospectively recorded. The mean follow-up was 7.2±5.1 years, for a total of 3258 valve-years. The follow-up data were 97.8% complete.
RESULTS: The operative mortality rate was 3.3%. A total of 188 late deaths occurred, for a linearized rate of 5.8%/valve-year. At 20 years, the overall actuarial survival rate was 16.9%±3.9%. Age at implantation, preoperative New York Heart Association class III or IV, and redo procedure were significant risk factors affecting late survival. The actuarial freedom from complications at 20 years was thromboembolism, 83.9%±7.6%; hemorrhage, 80.2%±10.8%; endocarditis, 94.8%±1.4%; structural valve deterioration, 23.7%±6.9%; and explantation owing to structural valve deterioration, 40.5%±8.0%. The competing risk analysis demonstrated an actual risk of explantation owing to structural valve deterioration at 20 years of 25.5%±2.9%. The expected valve durability was 16.6 years for the entire cohort (11.4, 16.6, and 19.4 years for patients aged <60, 60 to 70, and >70 years, respectively).
CONCLUSIONS: With a low rate of valve-related events at 20 years and, in particular, a low rate of structural valve deterioration, the Carpentier-Edwards PERIMOUNT pericardial bioprosthesis remains a reliable choice for a mitral tissue valve, especially in patients >60 years old.
Copyright © 2014 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24667021     DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2014.02.050

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg        ISSN: 0022-5223            Impact factor:   5.209


  21 in total

1.  Trends in Drug Use-Associated Infective Endocarditis and Heart Valve Surgery, 2007 to 2017: A Study of Statewide Discharge Data.

Authors:  Asher J Schranz; Aaron Fleischauer; Vivian H Chu; Li-Tzy Wu; David L Rosen
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2018-12-04       Impact factor: 25.391

Review 2.  Selection of prosthetic valve and evidence--need for the development of Japan's own guidelines.

Authors:  Akira Sezai; Motomi Shiono
Journal:  Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2015-06-09       Impact factor: 1.520

3.  A mechanical heart valve is the best choice.

Authors:  Iqbal H Jaffer; Richard P Whitlock
Journal:  Heart Asia       Date:  2016-04-28

4.  Early outcomes of transcatheter mitral valve replacement for degenerated bioprosthesis in Japanese (MITRAL VIV study): a four-case series.

Authors:  Kizuku Yamashita; Satsuki Fukushima; Yusuke Shimahara; Atsushi Okada; Makoto Amaki; Hideaki Kanzaki; Chisato Izumi; Satoshi Yasuda; Junjiro Kobayashi; Tomoyuki Fujita
Journal:  Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2019-05-25

5.  Transcatheter mitral valve replacement for degenerated mitral bioprostheses: a systematic review.

Authors:  Mackram F Eleid; Charanjit S Rihal; Mayra E Guerrero
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2021-09

6.  Access options for transcatheter mitral valve implantation in patients with prior surgical bioprosthesis.

Authors:  Laura Besola; Anson Cheung; Jian Ye; Myriam Akodad; Andrew Chatfield; Gnalini Sathananthan; Robert Moss; John Webb
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2021-09

7.  Reoperative Mitral Surgery Versus Transcatheter Mitral Valve Replacement: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Aditya Sengupta; Farhang Yazdchi; Sophia L Alexis; Edward Percy; Akash Premkumar; Sameer Hirji; Vinayak N Bapat; Deepak L Bhatt; Tsuyoshi Kaneko; Gilbert H L Tang
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2021-03-09       Impact factor: 5.501

8.  Economic Analysis and Long-term Follow-up of Distant Referral for Degenerative Mitral Valve Repair.

Authors:  Alexander A Brescia; Michael J Paulsen; Tessa M F Watt; Liza M Rosenbloom; Alexander M Wisniewski; Jun Li; Guihua Wang; Donald S Likosky; Wallace J Hopp; Steven F Bolling
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2020-07-18       Impact factor: 4.330

9.  Late results after mitral valve replacement with Mosaic bioprosthesis in patients aged 65 years or younger.

Authors:  Giovanni A Chiariello; Anne-Sophie Beraud; Olivier Vahdat; Jérôme Van Rothem; Olivier Garcia; Philippe Soula; Pierre Berthoumieu; Issam Abouliatim
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2021-07-26

10.  Medium long-term follow-up outcomes of BalMedic® bovine pericardial bioprosthetic valve in the mitral position.

Authors:  Sumin Yang; Haoyu Hu; Minghao Lin; Naiyan Gan
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2021-06       Impact factor: 2.895

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.