Literature DB >> 28007972

Fitness Trade-Offs Lead to Suppressor Tolerance in Yeast.

Jing Hou1, Joseph Schacherer2.   

Abstract

Genetic variation among individuals within a population provides the raw material for phenotypic diversity upon which natural selection operates. Some given variants can act on multiple standing genomic variations simultaneously and release previously inaccessible phenotypes, leading to increased adaptive potential upon challenging environments. Previously, we identified such a variant related to a tRNA nonsense suppressor in yeast. When introduced into other genetic backgrounds, the suppressor led to an increased population phenotypic variance on various culture conditions, conferring background and environment specific selective advantages. Nonetheless, most isolates are intolerant to the suppressor on rich media due to a severe fitness cost. Here, we found that the tolerance to suppressor is related to a surprising level of fitness outburst, showing a trade-off effect to accommodate the cost of carrying the suppressor. To dissect the genetic basis of such trade-offs, we crossed strains with contrasting tolerance levels on rich media, and analyzed the fitness distribution patterns in the offspring. Combining quantitative tetrad analysis and bulk segregant analysis, we identified two genes, namely MKT1 and RGA1, involved in suppressor tolerance. We showed that alleles from the tolerant parent for both genes conferred a significant gain of fitness, which increased the suppressor tolerance. Our results present a detailed dissection of suppressor tolerance in yeast and provide insights into the molecular basis of trade-offs between fitness and evolutionary potential.
© The Author 2016. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for Molecular Biology and Evolution. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  evolutionary capacitance; fitness trade-offs; natural variation; yeast

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 28007972      PMCID: PMC5854122          DOI: 10.1093/molbev/msw225

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Biol Evol        ISSN: 0737-4038            Impact factor:   16.240


  28 in total

1.  Chromosomal duplication is a transient evolutionary solution to stress.

Authors:  Avihu H Yona; Yair S Manor; Rebecca H Herbst; Gal H Romano; Amir Mitchell; Martin Kupiec; Yitzhak Pilpel; Orna Dahan
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-11-29       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  The landscape of genetic complexity across 5,700 gene expression traits in yeast.

Authors:  Rachel B Brem; Leonid Kruglyak
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-01-19       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Inhibition of growth by amber suppressors in yeast.

Authors:  S W Liebman; F Sherman
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1976-02       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 4.  The molecular basis of phenotypic variation in yeast.

Authors:  Justin C Fay
Journal:  Curr Opin Genet Dev       Date:  2013-11-21       Impact factor: 5.578

5.  Genetic architecture of ethanol-responsive transcriptome variation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains.

Authors:  Jeffrey A Lewis; Aimee T Broman; Jessica Will; Audrey P Gasch
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2014-06-26       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  Dosage compensation can buffer copy-number variation in wild yeast.

Authors:  James Hose; Chris Mun Yong; Maria Sardi; Zhishi Wang; Michael A Newton; Audrey P Gasch
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2015-05-08       Impact factor: 8.140

7.  Comprehensive survey of condition-specific reproductive isolation reveals genetic incompatibility in yeast.

Authors:  Jing Hou; Anne Friedrich; Jean-Sebastien Gounot; Joseph Schacherer
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2015-05-26       Impact factor: 14.919

8.  Genetic mapping of MAPK-mediated complex traits Across S. cerevisiae.

Authors:  Sebastian Treusch; Frank W Albert; Joshua S Bloom; Iulia E Kotenko; Leonid Kruglyak
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2015-01-08       Impact factor: 5.917

9.  Determinants of divergent adaptation and Dobzhansky-Muller interaction in experimental yeast populations.

Authors:  James B Anderson; Jason Funt; Dawn Anne Thompson; Snehit Prabhu; Amanda Socha; Caroline Sirjusingh; Jeremy R Dettman; Lucas Parreiras; David S Guttman; Aviv Regev; Linda M Kohn
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2010-07-15       Impact factor: 10.834

10.  Integrative phenomics reveals insight into the structure of phenotypic diversity in budding yeast.

Authors:  Daniel A Skelly; Gennifer E Merrihew; Michael Riffle; Caitlin F Connelly; Emily O Kerr; Marnie Johansson; Daniel Jaschob; Beth Graczyk; Nicholas J Shulman; Jon Wakefield; Sara J Cooper; Stanley Fields; William S Noble; Eric G D Muller; Trisha N Davis; Maitreya J Dunham; Michael J Maccoss; Joshua M Akey
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2013-05-29       Impact factor: 9.043

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  Genetic suppression: Extending our knowledge from lab experiments to natural populations.

Authors:  Takeshi Matsui; Jonathan T Lee; Ian M Ehrenreich
Journal:  Bioessays       Date:  2017-05-04       Impact factor: 4.345

2.  RNA Interference (RNAi ) as a Tool for High-Resolution Phenotypic Screening of the Pathogenic Yeast Candida glabrata.

Authors:  Andreas Tsouris; Joseph Schacherer; Olena P Ishchuk
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2022

Review 3.  Genetic Network Complexity Shapes Background-Dependent Phenotypic Expression.

Authors:  Jing Hou; Jolanda van Leeuwen; Brenda J Andrews; Charles Boone
Journal:  Trends Genet       Date:  2018-06-11       Impact factor: 11.639

4.  Identification of novel genes involved in neutral lipid storage by quantitative trait loci analysis of Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Uroš Petrovič; Klaus Natter; Klavdija Pačnik; Mojca Ogrizović; Matthias Diepold; Tobias Eisenberg; Mia Žganjar; Gašper Žun; Beti Kužnik; Cene Gostinčar; Tomaž Curk
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2021-02-09       Impact factor: 3.969

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.