Literature DB >> 28007240

The Society of Thoracic Surgeons 2017 Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Surgical Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation.

Vinay Badhwar1, J Scott Rankin2, Ralph J Damiano3, A Marc Gillinov4, Faisal G Bakaeen4, James R Edgerton5, Jonathan M Philpott6, Patrick M McCarthy7, Steven F Bolling8, Harold G Roberts9, Vinod H Thourani10, Rakesh M Suri4, Richard J Shemin11, Scott Firestone12, Niv Ad2.   

Abstract

EXECUTIVE
SUMMARY: Surgical ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF) can be performed without additional risk of operative mortality or major morbidity, and is recommended at the time of concomitant mitral operations to restore sinus rhythm. (Class I, Level A) Surgical ablation for AF can be performed without additional operative risk of mortality or major morbidity, and is recommended at the time of concomitant isolated aortic valve replacement, isolated coronary artery bypass graft surgery, and aortic valve replacement plus coronary artery bypass graft operations to restore sinus rhythm. (Class I, Level B nonrandomized) Surgical ablation for symptomatic AF in the absence of structural heart disease that is refractory to class I/III antiarrhythmic drugs or catheter-based therapy or both is reasonable as a primary stand-alone procedure, to restore sinus rhythm. (Class IIA, Level B randomized) Surgical ablation for symptomatic persistent or longstanding persistent AF in the absence of structural heart disease is reasonable, as a stand-alone procedure using the Cox-Maze III/IV lesion set compared with pulmonary vein isolation alone. (Class IIA, Level B nonrandomized) Surgical ablation for symptomatic AF in the setting of left atrial enlargement (≥4.5 cm) or more than moderate mitral regurgitation by pulmonary vein isolation alone is not recommended. (Class III no benefit, Level C expert opinion) It is reasonable to perform left atrial appendage excision or exclusion in conjunction with surgical ablation for AF for longitudinal thromboembolic morbidity prevention. (Class IIA, Level C limited data) At the time of concomitant cardiac operations in patients with AF, it is reasonable to surgically manage the left atrial appendage for longitudinal thromboembolic morbidity prevention. (Class IIA, Level C expert opinion) In the treatment of AF, multidisciplinary heart team assessment, treatment planning, and long-term follow-up can be useful and beneficial to optimize patient outcomes. (Class I, Level C expert opinion).
Copyright © 2017 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28007240     DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2016.10.076

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg        ISSN: 0003-4975            Impact factor:   4.330


  58 in total

Review 1.  Management of Atrial Fibrillation in Patients Undergoing Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting: Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Ali J Khiabani; Taylan Adademir; Richard B Schuessler; Spencer J Melby; Marc R Moon; Ralph J Damiano
Journal:  Innovations (Phila)       Date:  2018 Nov/Dec

2.  Contemporary Surgical Management of Atrial Fibrillation.

Authors:  Tyler M Gunn; Tessa E London; Sibu P Saha
Journal:  Int J Angiol       Date:  2020-03-29

3.  Treatment Complications of Atrial Fibrillation and Their Management.

Authors:  Allan Mattia; Joshua Newman; Frank Manetta
Journal:  Int J Angiol       Date:  2020-03-05

Review 4.  Patient selection and methods of surgical left atrial appendage exclusion.

Authors:  Jason W Greenberg; Richard Lee; Dawn S Hui
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2019-08       Impact factor: 2.300

5.  An important piece of the puzzle for understanding the benefits of concomitant ablation of atrial fibrillation in cardiac surgery.

Authors:  Anders Albåge
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2018-06

6.  The future of hybrid ablation: an emerging need for an anticoagulation protocol for thoracoscopic ablation.

Authors:  Pavel Osmancik; Petr Budera
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 2.895

Review 7.  The Cox-maze IV procedure in its second decade: still the gold standard?

Authors:  Chawannuch Ruaengsri; Matthew R Schill; Ali J Khiabani; Richard B Schuessler; Spencer J Melby; Ralph J Damiano
Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2018-04-01       Impact factor: 4.191

8.  Biatrial maze procedure versus pulmonary vein isolation for atrial fibrillation during mitral valve surgery: New analytical approaches and end points.

Authors:  Eugene H Blackstone; Helena L Chang; Jeevanantham Rajeswaran; Michael K Parides; Hemant Ishwaran; Liang Li; John Ehrlinger; Annetine C Gelijns; Alan J Moskowitz; Michael Argenziano; Joseph J DeRose; Jean-Phillipe Couderc; Dan Balda; François Dagenais; Michael J Mack; Gorav Ailawadi; Peter K Smith; Michael A Acker; Patrick T O'Gara; A Marc Gillinov
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2018-07-27       Impact factor: 5.209

9.  Evaluation of anticoagulation use and subsequent stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation after empiric surgical left atrial appendage closure: A retrospective case-control study.

Authors:  Daniel O Johnsrud; Rowlens M Melduni; Brian Lahr; Xiaoxi Yao; Kevin L Greason; Peter A Noseworthy
Journal:  Clin Cardiol       Date:  2018-12-10       Impact factor: 2.882

Review 10.  Sex Differences in Atrial Fibrillation-Update on Risk Assessment, Treatment, and Long-Term Risk.

Authors:  Charlotte J Bai; Nidhi Madan; Shaza Alshahrani; Neelum T Aggarwal; Annabelle Santos Volgman
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2018-08-27
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.