Charlotte J Bai1, Nidhi Madan2, Shaza Alshahrani3, Neelum T Aggarwal4, Annabelle Santos Volgman5. 1. Rush Heart Center for Women, 1725 W. Harrison St. Suite 1159, Chicago, IL, 60612-3864, USA. Charlotte_J_Bai@rush.edu. 2. Rush University Medical Center, 1717 W. Congress Pkwy, Suite 317 Kellogg, Chicago, IL, 606012, USA. 3. King Abdul-Aziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia. 4. Rush Alzheimer's Disease Center, Rush Heart Center for Women, 1725 Harrison St. Suite 1159, Chicago, IL, 60612, USA. 5. Rush Heart Center for Women, 1725 W. Harrison St. Suite 1159, Chicago, IL, 60612-3864, USA.
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a growing health problem worldwide. While the disease plagues both men and women, this arrhythmia does not affect both sexes equally. Women are more likely to have major adverse outcomes such as stroke and its sequela; however, recent data on stroke prevention show improving outcomes. The purpose of this review of the recent literature is to summarize important updates on risk scores and management of patients with AF. RECENT FINDINGS: It has been well known that women have a higher risk of strokes than men when untreated or when treated with warfarin. Current risk scores emphasizing new risk factors such as the higher risk of strokes in women have been incorporated into clinical guidelines. However, with the use of direct oral anticoagulants, this sex disparity on stroke is no longer seen and women have less major bleeding than men. The use of cardiac glycosides is associated with increased incidence of breast cancer, and this medication is used more in women. Procedural complications for the management of AF are higher in women. The study of the pathophysiology of AF and its management is a rapidly evolving area of cardiovascular medicine. Sex-specific data is necessary to achieve advances in the field and improve the outcomes in both men and women.
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a growing health problem worldwide. While the disease plagues both men and women, this arrhythmia does not affect both sexes equally. Women are more likely to have major adverse outcomes such as stroke and its sequela; however, recent data on stroke prevention show improving outcomes. The purpose of this review of the recent literature is to summarize important updates on risk scores and management of patients with AF. RECENT FINDINGS: It has been well known that women have a higher risk of strokes than men when untreated or when treated with warfarin. Current risk scores emphasizing new risk factors such as the higher risk of strokes in women have been incorporated into clinical guidelines. However, with the use of direct oral anticoagulants, this sex disparity on stroke is no longer seen and women have less major bleeding than men. The use of cardiac glycosides is associated with increased incidence of breast cancer, and this medication is used more in women. Procedural complications for the management of AF are higher in women. The study of the pathophysiology of AF and its management is a rapidly evolving area of cardiovascular medicine. Sex-specific data is necessary to achieve advances in the field and improve the outcomes in both men and women.
Entities:
Keywords:
Atrial fibrillation; Cardiovascular disease in women; Stroke prevention
Authors: Raluca Ionescu-Ittu; Michal Abrahamowicz; Cynthia A Jackevicius; Vidal Essebag; Mark J Eisenberg; Willy Wynant; Hugues Richard; Louise Pilote Journal: Arch Intern Med Date: 2012-07-09
Authors: Manesh R Patel; Kenneth W Mahaffey; Jyotsna Garg; Guohua Pan; Daniel E Singer; Werner Hacke; Günter Breithardt; Jonathan L Halperin; Graeme J Hankey; Jonathan P Piccini; Richard C Becker; Christopher C Nessel; John F Paolini; Scott D Berkowitz; Keith A A Fox; Robert M Califf Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2011-08-10 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Emily C O'Brien; DaJuanicia N Holmes; Jack E Ansell; Larry A Allen; Elaine Hylek; Peter R Kowey; Bernard J Gersh; Gregg C Fonarow; Christopher R Koller; Michael D Ezekowitz; Kenneth W Mahaffey; Paul Chang; Eric D Peterson; Jonathan P Piccini; Daniel E Singer Journal: Am Heart J Date: 2014-01-04 Impact factor: 4.749
Authors: Paulus Kirchhof; Günter Breithardt; A John Camm; Harry J Crijns; Karl-Heinz Kuck; Panos Vardas; Karl Wegscheider Journal: Am Heart J Date: 2013-07-30 Impact factor: 4.749
Authors: Pamela K Mason; Douglas E Lake; John P DiMarco; John D Ferguson; J Michael Mangrum; Kenneth Bilchick; Liza P Moorman; J Randall Moorman Journal: Am J Med Date: 2012-04-11 Impact factor: 4.965
Authors: Mark D Huffman; Kunal N Karmali; Mark A Berendsen; Adin-Cristian Andrei; Jane Kruse; Patrick M McCarthy; S C Malaisrie Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2016-08-22
Authors: Richard Whitlock; Jeff Healey; Jessica Vincent; Kate Brady; Kevin Teoh; Alistair Royse; Pallav Shah; Yingqiang Guo; Marco Alings; Richard J Folkeringa; Domenico Paparella; Andrea Colli; Steven R Meyer; Jean-François Legare; François Lamontagne; Wilko Reents; Andreas Böning; Stuart Connolly Journal: Ann Cardiothorac Surg Date: 2014-01
Authors: Jan Ciszewski; Aleksander Maciag; Ilona Kowalik; Pawel Syska; Michal Lewandowski; Michal M Farkowski; Anna Borowiec; Tomasz Chwyczko; Mariusz Pytkowski; Hanna Szwed; Maciej Sterlinski Journal: Trials Date: 2014-10-04 Impact factor: 2.279