Literature DB >> 28005400

Does Allograft Augmentation of Small-Diameter Hamstring Autograft ACL Grafts Reduce the Incidence of Graft Retear?

Andrew T Pennock1,2, Brian Ho2, Kristina Parvanta1, Eric W Edmonds1,2, Henry G Chambers1,2, Joanna H Roocroft1, Tracey P Bastrom1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Small-diameter hamstring tendons are frequently encountered during anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstructions in patients with short stature or those who are skeletally immature. The role of augmenting these small-diameter autografts with allograft is unclear.
PURPOSE: To assess clinical outcomes and failure rates in adolescent patients with small hamstring tendon autografts (<7 mm) that were either augmented with soft tissue allograft or accepted "as is" and not augmented. STUDY
DESIGN: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.
METHODS: A retrospective chart review of all primary ACL reconstructions performed with hamstring autografts identified 385 patients, of whom 50 (13%) had a quadrupled (semitendinosus-gracilis) graft size less than 7 mm. Patients were grouped based on the surgeon's preference either to augment these grafts with allograft (augmented group; n = 26) or to accept the smaller autograft (nonaugmented group; n = 24). Preoperative demographic, injury, and intraoperative data were documented. All patients were contacted to obtain information about outcome scores, subsequent procedures, and complications. Forty patients (20 in each group) were available for 2-year follow-up.
RESULTS: The mean age of the entire cohort was 15.7 years (range, 12-18 years), and 38% were male. No between-group differences were found with respect to any of the preoperative or intraoperative variables except extremity side. The mean graft size for the augmented group was 8.9 mm and for the nonaugmented group was 6.4 mm. At a mean follow-up of 3 years, 6 (30%) of the patients in the augmented group had a graft failure, whereas only 1 (5%) in the nonaugmented group had a failure ( P = .04). Five of the 6 augmented failures occurred within 1 year of surgery, whereas the single failure in the nonaugmented group occurred 2.7years postoperatively. No differences were noted in the reported outcomes between patients in the augmented and nonaugmented groups who did not experience graft failure (Lysholm score, 88 vs 92; Tegner score, 6.4 vs 6.3; single-assessment numeric evaluation score, 86 vs 86; satisfaction, 8.4 vs 8.9, respectively).
CONCLUSION: Adolescents undergoing an ACL reconstruction frequently have small hamstring tendon autograft size. The augmentation of these small grafts with allograft does not reduce graft failure rates and may in fact lead to higher retear rates, with earlier graft failure.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ACL allograft; ACL augmentation; ACL autograft; hybrid ACL; small hamstring

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 28005400     DOI: 10.1177/0363546516677545

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Sports Med        ISSN: 0363-5465            Impact factor:   6.202


  19 in total

1.  Small hamstring autograft is defined by a cut-off diameter of 7 mm and not recommended with allograft augmentation in single-bundle ACL reconstruction.

Authors:  Huijun Kang; Conglei Dong; Fei Wang
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2019-03-27       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  In situ cross-sectional area of the quadriceps tendon using preoperative magnetic resonance imaging significantly correlates with the intraoperative diameter of the quadriceps tendon autograft.

Authors:  Satoshi Takeuchi; Benjamin B Rothrauff; Masashi Taguchi; Ryo Kanto; Kentaro Onishi; Freddie H Fu
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2020-04-24       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 3.  Etiology of Failed Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: a Scoping Review.

Authors:  Dan Cohen; Patrick Fangping Yao; Abhilash Uddandam; Darren de Sa; Michelle E Arakgi
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2022-07-19

4.  Preoperative ultrasound predicts the intraoperative diameter of the quadriceps tendon autograft more accurately than preoperative magnetic resonance imaging for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Satoshi Takeuchi; Benjamin B Rothrauff; Masashi Taguchi; Kentaro Onishi; Freddie H Fu
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2021-01-18       Impact factor: 4.342

5.  Preoperative Ultrasonography Is Unreliable in Predicting Hamstring Tendon Graft Diameter for ACL Reconstruction.

Authors:  Amit M Momaya; Clint Beicker; Paul Siffri; Michael J Kissenberth; Jeffrey Backes; Lane Bailey; Gabriel J Rulewicz; Jennifer M Mercuri; E Carlisle Shealy; John M Tokish; Charles A Thigpen
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2018-01-03

6.  Adolescent Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction: A Comparison of the Use of Autograft Versus Allograft Hamstring.

Authors:  Nikhil Kumar; Tracey P Bastrom; M Morgan Dennis; Andrew T Pennock; Eric W Edmonds
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2018-05-24

Review 7.  Which Metrics Are Being Used to Evaluate Children and Adolescents After ACL Reconstruction? A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Peter D Fabricant; Christopher M Brusalis; Jonathan M Schachne; Matthew J Matava
Journal:  Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil       Date:  2020-07-22

8.  Hamstring Autograft in ACL Reconstruction: A 13-Year Predictive Analysis of Anthropometric Factors and Surgeon Trends Relating to Graft Size.

Authors:  Prem N Ramkumar; Michael D Hadley; Morgan H Jones; Lutul D Farrow
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2018-06-19

9.  Can We Accurately Predict the Quadruple Hamstring Graft Diameter From Preoperative Magnetic Resonance Imaging?

Authors:  Nicolas Vardiabasis; Brian Mosier; Jason Walters; Aaron Burgess; Greg Altman; Sam Akhavan
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2019-03-26

10.  All-Inside Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction as a Salvage for Small or Attenuated Hamstring Grafts.

Authors:  Patrick E Jones; Dustin J Schuett
Journal:  Arthrosc Tech       Date:  2018-04-09
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.