Literature DB >> 2800346

Responses of retinal ganglion cells to eyeball deformation: a neurophysiological basis for "pressure phosphenes".

O J Grüsser1, U Grüsser-Cornehls, R Kusel, A W Przybyszewski.   

Abstract

By means of microelectrodes, the activity of single neurons (on-center, off-center ganglion cells, latency class I and class II neurons) was recorded from the optic tract of anesthetized cats. Eyeball deformation in total darkness led fairly consistently to an activation of the on-center ganglion cells, while off-center ganglion cells were inhibited. The latency and strength of this activation or inhibition seemed to be mainly dependent on the strength of eyeball indentation and the location of the neurons relative to the point of eyeball indentation. Some on-center neurons (mostly latency class I) also exhibited a short activation at "deformation off". For comparison, the responses of retinal ganglion cells to eyeball deformation in a hydrostatically open system and to a sudden increase in the intraocular pressure (closed system) are described. The neurophysiological data are explained by the assumption that eyeball indentation leads to a nonuniform tangential stretch of the retina, which exerts a locally variable depolarization of horizontal cells. This horizontal cell depolarization leads either directly or via a feedback loop through cone pedicles to a depolarization of on-bipolars and a hyperpolarization of off-bipolars. These effects determine in turn the responses seen at the ganglion cell level. It is emphasized that eyeball deformation can be used as an independent tool in transmitter studies of the retina.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2800346     DOI: 10.1016/0042-6989(89)90123-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  9 in total

1.  On the history of deformation phosphenes and the idea of internal light generated in the eye for the purpose of vision.

Authors:  O J Grüsser; M Hagner
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  1990-02       Impact factor: 2.379

2.  Radiation Force as a Physical Mechanism for Ultrasonic Neurostimulation of the Ex Vivo Retina.

Authors:  Mike D Menz; Patrick Ye; Kamyar Firouzi; Amin Nikoozadeh; Kim Butts Pauly; Pierre Khuri-Yakub; Stephen A Baccus
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2019-06-13       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  The polymodal ion channel transient receptor potential vanilloid 4 modulates calcium flux, spiking rate, and apoptosis of mouse retinal ganglion cells.

Authors:  Daniel A Ryskamp; Paul Witkovsky; Peter Barabas; Wei Huang; Christopher Koehler; Nikolay P Akimov; Suk Hee Lee; Shiwani Chauhan; Wei Xing; René C Rentería; Wolfgang Liedtke; David Krizaj
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2011-05-11       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Differential effects of compression and suction ophthalmodynamometry on the scotopic blue-flash electroretinogram.

Authors:  J V Lovasik; A C Kothe; H Kergoat
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 2.379

5.  Polymodal Sensory Integration in Retinal Ganglion Cells.

Authors:  David Križaj
Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol       Date:  2016       Impact factor: 2.622

6.  A clinical evaluation of proview pressure phosphene tonometry in children.

Authors:  Ida Chung; Amelia Bartolone; William H Swanson; Andrea P Thau
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 1.973

7.  Light-induced responses of slow oscillatory neurons of the rat olivary pretectal nucleus.

Authors:  Hanna J Szkudlarek; Patrycja Orlowska; Marian H Lewandowski
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-03-12       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  A framework for the first-person internal sensation of visual perception in mammals and a comparable circuitry for olfactory perception in Drosophila.

Authors:  Kunjumon I Vadakkan
Journal:  Springerplus       Date:  2015-12-30

9.  Investigating the Effects of Mechanical Stimulation on Retinal Ganglion Cell Spontaneous Spiking Activity.

Authors:  Marica Marrese; Davide Lonardoni; Fabio Boi; Hedde van Hoorn; Alessandro Maccione; Stefano Zordan; Davide Iannuzzi; Luca Berdondini
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2019-09-27       Impact factor: 4.677

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.