Literature DB >> 28003415

Rapid and flexible whole body postural responses are evoked from perturbations to the upper limb during goal-directed reaching.

Catherine R Lowrey1, Joseph Y Nashed1, Stephen H Scott2,3,4.   

Abstract

An important aspect of motor control is the ability to perform tasks with the upper limbs while maintaining whole body balance. However, little is known about the coordination of upper limb voluntary and whole body postural control after mechanical disturbances that require both upper limb motor corrections to attain a behavioral goal and lower limb motor responses to maintain whole body balance. The present study identified the temporal organization of muscle responses and center of pressure (COP) changes following mechanical perturbations during reaching. Our results demonstrate that muscle responses in the upper limb are evoked first (∼50 ms), with lower limb muscle activity occurring immediately after, in as little as ∼60 ms after perturbation. Hand motion was immediately altered by the load, while COP changes occurred after ∼100 ms, when lower limb muscle activity was already present. Our secondary findings showed that both muscle activity and COP changes were influenced by behavioral context (by altering target shape, circle vs. rectangle). Voluntary and postural actions initially directed the hand toward the center of both target types, but after the perturbation upper limb and postural responses redirected the hand toward different spatial locations along the rectangle. Muscle activity was increased for both upper and lower limbs when correcting to the circle vs. the rectangle, and these differences emerged as early as the long-latency epoch (∼75-120 ms). Our results demonstrate that postural responses are rapidly and flexibly altered to consider the behavioral goal of the upper limb.NEW & NOTEWORTHY The present work establishes that, when reaching to a target while standing, perturbations applied to the upper limb elicit a rapid response in lower limb muscles. Unlike voluntary movements, postural responses do not occur before corrections of the upper limb. We show the first evidence that corrective postural adjustments are modulated by upper limb behavioral context (target shape). Importantly, this indicates that postural responses take into account upper limb feedback for online control.
Copyright © 2017 the American Physiological Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  posture; reflexes; task-dependent responses; upper limb

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 28003415      PMCID: PMC5338618          DOI: 10.1152/jn.01004.2015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  51 in total

1.  Voluntary modification of automatic arm movements evoked by motion of a visual target.

Authors:  B L Day; I N Lyon
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Influence of the behavioral goal and environmental obstacles on rapid feedback responses.

Authors:  Joseph Y Nashed; Frédéric Crevecoeur; Stephen H Scott
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2012-05-23       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Descending signals from the pontomedullary reticular formation are bilateral, asymmetric, and gated during reaching movements in the cat.

Authors:  Bénédicte Schepens; Trevor Drew
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2006-07-12       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Functional connectivity between secondary and primary motor areas underlying hand-foot coordination.

Authors:  Winston D Byblow; James P Coxon; Cathy M Stinear; Melanie K Fleming; Garry Williams; J Florian M Müller; Ulf Ziemann
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2007-05-16       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Cholinoceptive pontine reticular structures modify the postural adjustments during the limb movements induced by cortical stimulation.

Authors:  P Luccarini; Y Gahery; O Pompeiano
Journal:  Arch Ital Biol       Date:  1990-01       Impact factor: 1.000

6.  Postural adjustments for online corrections of arm movements in standing humans.

Authors:  Julia A Leonard; Valeriya Gritsenko; Ryan Ouckama; Paul J Stapley
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2011-02-23       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  EMG studies of stretch reflexes in man.

Authors:  K E Hagbarth
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1967

8.  Early stabilization of human posture after a sudden disturbance: influence of rate and amplitude of displacement.

Authors:  H C Diener; J Dichgans; F Bootz; M Bacher
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1984       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Human postural responses.

Authors:  C D Marsden; P A Merton; H B Morton
Journal:  Brain       Date:  1981-09       Impact factor: 13.501

10.  Adapting reflexes controlling the human posture.

Authors:  L M Nashner
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1976-08-27       Impact factor: 1.972

View more
  8 in total

1.  Visual Feedback Processing of the Limb Involves Two Distinct Phases.

Authors:  Kevin P Cross; Tyler Cluff; Tomohiko Takei; Stephen H Scott
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2019-07-15       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  The effect of increased cognitive processing on reactive balance control following perturbations to the upper limb.

Authors:  Megan Trotman; Michael Kennefick; Scott Coughlin; Paul van Donkelaar; Brian H Dalton
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2022-03-05       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Origin of directionally tuned responses in lower limb muscles to unpredictable upper limb disturbances.

Authors:  Ali Forghani; Theodore E Milner
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-11-02       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Postural responses to target jumps and background motion in a fast pointing task.

Authors:  Yajie Zhang; Eli Brenner; Jacques Duysens; Sabine Verschueren; Jeroen B J Smeets
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2018-03-23       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Characteristics of medial-lateral postural control while exposed to the external perturbation in step initiation.

Authors:  Yun-Ju Lee; Jing Nong Liang; Bing Chen; Alexander S Aruin
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-11-14       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Integration of proprioceptive and visual feedback during online control of reaching.

Authors:  Shoko Kasuga; Frédéric Crevecoeur; Kevin P Cross; Parsa Balalaie; Stephen H Scott
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2021-12-15       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Continuous Tracking of Task Parameters Tunes Reaching Control Online.

Authors:  Antoine De Comite; Frédéric Crevecoeur; Philippe Lefèvre
Journal:  eNeuro       Date:  2022-07-22

8.  Integrated robotics platform with haptic control differentiates subjects with Parkinson's disease from controls and quantifies the motor effects of levodopa.

Authors:  Pauline Gaprielian; Stephen H Scott; Catherine Lowrey; Stuart Reid; Giovanna Pari; Ron Levy
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2019-10-26       Impact factor: 4.262

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.