Literature DB >> 35247064

The effect of increased cognitive processing on reactive balance control following perturbations to the upper limb.

Megan Trotman1, Michael Kennefick1, Scott Coughlin1, Paul van Donkelaar1, Brian H Dalton2.   

Abstract

Reactive balance control following hand perturbations is important for everyday living as humans constantly encounter perturbations to the upper limb while performing functional tasks while standing. When multiple tasks are performed simultaneously, cognitive processing is increased, and performance on at least one of the tasks is often disrupted, owing to attentional resources being divided. The purpose here was to assess the effects of increased cognitive processing on whole-body balance responses to perturbations of the hand during continuous voluntary reaching. Sixteen participants (8 females; 22.9 ± 4.5 years) stood and grasped the handle of a KINARM - a robotic-controlled manipulandum paired with an augmented visual display. Participants completed 10 total trials of 100 mediolateral arm movements at a consistent speed of one reach per second, and an auditory n-back task (cognitive task). Twenty anteroposterior hand perturbations were interspersed randomly throughout the reaching trials. The arm movements with random arm perturbations were either performed simultaneously with the cognitive task (combined task) or in isolation (arm perturbation task). Peak centre of pressure (COP) displacement and velocity, time to COP displacement onset and peak, as well as hand displacement and velocity following the hand perturbation were evaluated. N-back response times were 8% slower and 11% less accurate for the combined than the cognitive task. Peak COP displacement following posterior perturbations increased by 8% during the combined compared to the arm perturbation task alone, with no other differences detected. Hand peak displacement decreased by 5% during the combined compared to the arm perturbation task. The main findings indicate that with increased cognitive processing, attentional resources were allocated from the cognitive task towards upper limb movements, while attentional resources for balance seemed unaltered.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Divided attention; Dual-task; Postural control; Reaching; Standing balance

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35247064     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-022-06326-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  15 in total

Review 1.  Balance control analysis as a method for screening and identifying balance deficits.

Authors:  J H Allum; M G Carpenter; A L Adkin
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 5.691

2.  Age-dependent variations in the directional sensitivity of balance corrections and compensatory arm movements in man.

Authors:  J H J Allum; M G Carpenter; F Honegger; A L Adkin; B R Bloem
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2002-07-15       Impact factor: 5.182

3.  Cortical responses associated with predictable and unpredictable compensatory balance reactions.

Authors:  Allan L Adkin; Sylvia Quant; Brian E Maki; William E McIlroy
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-01-18       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Attention Is Required to Coordinate Reaching and Postural Stability during Upper Limb Movements Generated While Standing.

Authors:  Jill Dierijck; Michael Kennefick; Jonathan Smirl; Brian H Dalton; Paul van Donkelaar
Journal:  J Mot Behav       Date:  2019-03-27       Impact factor: 1.328

5.  The effects of dual tasking on handwriting in patients with Parkinson's disease.

Authors:  S Broeder; E Nackaerts; A Nieuwboer; B C M Smits-Engelsman; S P Swinnen; E Heremans
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2014-01-19       Impact factor: 3.590

6.  Central programming of postural movements: adaptation to altered support-surface configurations.

Authors:  F B Horak; L M Nashner
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1986-06       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Cerebral evoked potentials associated with the compensatory reactions following stance and gait perturbation.

Authors:  V Dietz; J Quintern; W Berger
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  1984-09-07       Impact factor: 3.046

8.  Postural strategies associated with somatosensory and vestibular loss.

Authors:  F B Horak; L M Nashner; H C Diener
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  A dual-task study of interference between mental activity and control of balance.

Authors:  G Andersson; L Yardley; L Luxon
Journal:  Am J Otol       Date:  1998-09

10.  Cognitive-motor interference during goal-directed upper-limb movements.

Authors:  Paulina J M Bank; Johan Marinus; Rosanne M van Tol; Iris F Groeneveld; Paula H Goossens; Jurriaan H de Groot; Jacobus J van Hilten; Carel G M Meskers
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2018-10-20       Impact factor: 3.386

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.