| Literature DB >> 28002444 |
Iria Villar1, David Alves1, Salustiano Mato1.
Abstract
In general, in composting facilities the active, or intensive, stage of the process is done separately from the maturation stage, using a specific technology and time. The pre-composted material to be matured can contain enough biodegradable substrates to cause microbial proliferation, which in turn can cause temperatures to increase. Therefore, not controlling the maturation period during waste management at an industrial level can result in undesired outcomes. The main hypothesis of this study is that controlling the maturation stage through turning provides one with an optimized process when compared to the static approach. The waste used was sludge from a seafood-processing plant, mixed with shredded wood (1:2, v/v). The composting system consists of an intensive stage in a 600L static reactor, followed by maturation in triplicate in 200L boxes for 112 days. Two tests were carried out with the same process in reactor and different treatments in boxes: static maturation and turning during maturation when the temperature went above 55°C. PLFAs, organic matter, pH, electrical conductivity, forms of nitrogen and carbon, hydrolytic enzymes and respiratory activity were periodically measured. Turning significantly increased the duration of the thermophilic phase and consequently increased the organic-matter degradation. PCA differentiated significantly the two treatments in function of tracking parameters, especially pH, total carbon, forms of nitrogen and C/N ratio. So, stability and maturity optimum values for compost were achieved in less time with turnings. Whereas turning resulted in microbial-group stabilization and a low mono/sat ratio, static treatment produced greater variability in microbial groups and a high mono/sat ratio, the presence of more degradable substrates causes changes in microbial communities and their study during maturation gives an approach of the state of organic-matter degradation. Obtaining quality compost and optimizing the composting process requires using turning as a control mechanism during maturation.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 28002444 PMCID: PMC5176180 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0168590
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Physico-chemical composition of the materials used in the composting experiments.
| Seafood sludge | Bulking agent | |
|---|---|---|
| 61.8 ± 0.4 | 41.4 ± 0.2 | |
| 87.7 ± 0.3 | 93.9 ± 0.4 | |
| 4.90 ± 0.04 | 6.66 ± 0.01 | |
| 0.55 ± 0.00 | 0.29 ± 0.01 | |
| 513.7 ± 3.2 | 558.2 ± 2.8 | |
| 19.24 ± 0.16 | 12.80 ± 0.29 | |
| 26.7 ± 0.2 | 43.6 ± 0.5 | |
| 19.8 ± 0.8 | N.D. |
dw: dry weight, N.D: not detected
Fig 1Temperature evolution during the reactor stage and the maturation stage for the turning treatment and static treatment.
Fig 2A) Principal component analysis (PCA) of the physico-chemical and biological variables of the turning treatment and static treatment B) Correlation circle showing the variables that define the components.
CN: carbon-to-nitrogen ratio, DON: dissolved organic nitrogen, EC: electrical conductivity, OM: organic matter, SR: static respiration, TC: total carbon, TN: total nitrogen, totPLFAs: total amount of PLFAs, WSC: water soluble carbon.
Compost characteristics after 56 and 112 days of maturation in the turning treatment and static treatment.
| 56 days | 112 days | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Turning | Static | Turning | Static | |
| 74.3 ± 0.3 | 76.8± 0.8 | 70.1 ± 0.5 | 75.7 ± 0.5 | |
| 5.99 ± 0.03 | 6.61± 0.03 | 6.01 ± 0.04 | 5.98 ± 0.05 | |
| 15.1 ± 0.5 | 12.7± 0.2 | 13.8 ± 0.2 | 13.1 ± 0.2 | |
| 0.17 ± 0.02 | 0.23 ± 0.01 | 0.11 ± 0.01 | 0.21 ± 0.01 | |
| 0.48 ± 0.03 | 0.64 ± 0.02 | 0.36 ± 0.02 | 0.47± 0.02 | |
| - | - | clase V | clase V | |
| 82.7 ± 1.5 | 58.3 ± 2.1 | 122.9± 6.9 | 77.3 ± 5.7 | |
| 6.03 ± 0.03 | 9.14 ± 0.03 | 4.21 ± 0.02 | 8.00 ± 0.01 | |
* indicates that samples for the same time between treatments are significantly different (Student t-test, p < 0.05) (SR: static respiration, GI: germination index).
Fig 3Dendrograms of cluster analysis based on PLFA profiles during the maturation stage in boxes of A) turning treatment and B) static treatment.
Dendrograms were done with the data of 8 samplings taken during the maturation stage (day 0 to the 112th day) and were drawn based on Ward’s method on the Euclidean distance.
Changes in microbial groups: bacteria Gram +, bacteria Gram—and fungi and ratio of monounsaturated to saturated (mono/sat) PLFAs during the maturation stage of the turning treatment and static treatment.
| Time (days) | Gram + (μg g-1dw) | Gram–(μg g-1dw) | Fungi (μg g-1dw) | mono/sat | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Turning | Static | Turning | Static | Turning | Static | Turning | Static | |
| 139.9 ± 3.9 | 176.1 ± 8.9 | 44.5 ± 4.1 | 39.0 ± 1.3 | 265.5 ± 2.1 | 276.4 ± 14.9 | 1.61 ± 0.10 | 1.25 ± 0.01 | |
| 119.8 ± 4.3 | 117.8 ± 5.7 | 20.0 ± 1.2 | 22.5 ± 1.4 | 244.9 ± 12.0 | 147.6 ± 10.3 | 1.32 ± 0.07 | 0.99 ± 0.02 | |
| 122.4 ± 7.7 | 91.3 ± 1.9 | 23.4 ± 1.6 | 90.6 ± 5.5 | 109.5 ± 6.6 | 106.8 ± 8.5 | 1.04 ± 0.06 | 1.50 ± 0.09 | |
| 41.0 ± 5.9 | 57.5 ± 3.1 | 13.3 ± 0.8 | 52.8 ± 6.6 | 29.8 ± 3.1 | 76.6 ± 8.3 | 0.78 ± 0.06 | 1.22 ± 0.06 | |
| 26.4 ± 2.1 | 60.2 ± 3.9 | 8.1 ± 1.0 | 52.9 ± 5.4 | 27.4 ± 3.5 | 79.2 ± 3.8 | 0.59 ± 0.09 | 1.27 ± 0.10 | |
| 39.4 ± 3.1 | 37.1 ± 1.9 | 10.4 ± 2.3 | 26.5 ± 3.8 | 45.6 ± 4.9 | 76.3 ± 7.0 | 0.78 ± 0.06 | 1.11 ± 0.06 | |
| 41.2 ± 4.2 | 61.4 ± 2.0 | 14.5 ± 1.0 | 46.1 ± 4.3 | 45.6 ± 2.3 | 94.7 ± 8.7 | 0.83 ± 0.05 | 1.18 ± 0.05 | |
| 26.6 ± 2.0 | 68.5 ± 4.5 | 11.7 ± 0.7 | 25.8 ± 0.4 | 29.4 ± 0.6 | 108.7 ± 6.9 | 0.79 ± 0.03 | 1.38 ± 0.06 | |
* indicates that samples for the same time between treatments are significantly different (Student t-test, p < 0.05) dw: dry weight