Classically, β-lactams need an ionizable group to potentiate antibacterial activity. Sets of cephalosporins and penicillins featuring different substituted hydroxamates in place of the traditional carboxylate group have been synthesized and tested for antibiotic activity. Many of the compounds exhibited anti-bacterial activities with notable MIC values in the range of 6-0.2 μM.
Classically, β-lactams need an ionizable group to potentiate antibacterial activity. Sets of cephalosporins and penicillins featuring different substituted hydroxamates in place of the traditional carboxylate group have been synthesized and tested for antibiotic activity. Many of the compounds exhibited anti-bacterial activities with notable MIC values in the range of 6-0.2 μM.
Among the various classes of antibiotics, the β-lactams continue to stand out as a hallmark of human accomplishment. This broad antibiotic group has saved countless numbers of lives and still makes up a majority of the antibiotic market today. The penicillins and cephalosporins represent the first two β-lactam scaffolds used clinically. These cores require an ionizable group to potentiate activity. For bicyclic β-lactams (e.g. penams, carbapenams, cephalosporins), the ionizable group is a carboxylate, while the monocyclic β-lactams (monobactams) typically utilize a sulfonate (-SO3) on the β-lactam ring nitrogen (Figure 1).[1,2] Herein we report the incorporation of hydroxamates (pKa 9–10)[3] or a hydroxamic acid (pKa ~6–7)[3] at the ionizable position of representative penicillins and cephalosporins to determine whether they could act as an alternate ionizable groups and promote anti-bacterial activity.
Figure 1
Classic β-Lactam Scaffolds and Proposed Hydroxamate Alternative
Over the last 80 years, a substantial number of person years have gone into modifying the peripheral functionality around the β-lactam core. These modifications often involved variations of the penicillin C-6 and cephalosporin C-7 acylamino sidechains and especially functionality at the C-3′ position of cephalosporins (see Figure 1 for numbering). However, few reports have focused on modifying the ionizable position of penicillins and cephalosporins. Reports of penicillins and cephalosporins bearing hydroxamate or hydroxamic acid functionalities are very scarce in the literature. Brown reported the syntheses of penicillin G and ampicillin derivatives bearing amide and hydroxamic acid functionality in place of the traditional carboxylate, with several of the compounds exhibiting notable activity against Gram-positive bacteria.[4] Further, Godfrey reported on the syntheses of a library of penicillin hydroxamates.[5] Some of these reported compounds are illustrated in Figure 2. However, only select activities of these compounds were reported, with no broad antibacterial assessments and comparisons included.
Figure 2
Sample Pencillins Previously Reported
Related variations of cephalosporins included a library of 7-phenylacetyl and 7-thiophene-2-acetylamino cephalosporins bearing various carboxamides patented by Lewis.[6] A number of these compounds, shown in Figure 3, were quite active, especially against S. aureus and B. cereus, exhibiting MIC values in the range of 6.25 to 0.003 μg/mL. However, again this report did not provide broad anti-bacterial screenings and comparisons to classic penicillin and cephalosporin scaffolds. With these reports in mind, we were interested in expanding upon the studies of β-lactams bearing different hydroxamate functionality at the ionizable position. Additionally, broad biological assessments and structure activity relationships among the different series are also presented, including consequences of removal of the acidic hydroxamate proton by alkylation.
Figure 3
Sample Cephalosporins Previous Reported
Results and Discussion
Our initial syntheses of cephalosporins are illustrated in Scheme 1. Commercially available 7-ACA was first acylated with phenylacetyl chloride to give 1 which was then coupled to both benzyl and O-TBS hydroxylamine to give 2a-b in good yields. Since removal of the benzyl group would likely be challenging in the presence of the divalent sulfur,[7] deprotection of intermediate 2a to give 3 was not studied. Rather, intermediate 2b was deprotected with TBAF/AcOH to give 3 in 42% yield.
Scheme 1
Syntheses of Hydroxamate Cephalosporins 2–3
Efforts then focused on the syntheses of cephalosporins that featured the more complex 2-(2-amino-4-thiazolyl)-2(Z)-(methoxyimino)acetamido (ATMO)[8] side chain that is often associated with a broader spectrum of antibiotic activity.[8] Thus, cefotaxime sodium was coupled to both O-benzylhydroxylamine hydrochloride (OBHA•HCl) and O-allylhydroxylamine hydrochloride (OAHA•HCl) to give cephalosporins 4a-b (Scheme 2).
Scheme 2
Syntheses of Cephalosporins with ATMO Side-Chain
Attention then shifted to the syntheses of cephalosporins in which the hydroxamate proton was replaced with a methyl group. Syntheses of the necessary N-methyl-O-alkyl hydroxylamines[9-10] and their coupling to cephalosporins are illustrated in Schemes 3 and 4. Starting with either OBHA•HCl or OAHA•HCl (5a-b), reaction with Boc anhydride, followed by reaction with NaH, then methyl iodide gave intermediates 6a-b in good yields. Removal of the Boc group was accomplished with concentrated HCl to give desired salts 7a-b that were then neutralized and coupled to both cefotaxime sodium and cephalosporin 1 to give compounds 8–10.
Scheme 3
Syntheses of N-Methyl O-Alkyl Hydroxylamines 7a-b
Scheme 4
Syntheses of N-Methyl Hydroxamate Cephalosporins 8–10
Penicillin carboxylates were also converted to the corresponding hydroxamates. Attempted EDC-mediated coupling of O-tert-butyl(dimethylsilyl)hydroxylamine to cloxicillin sodium under organic conditions (Scheme 5) produced the desired product (11) in low yield with the major product being the rearranged N-acyl urea (12), produced during carbodiimide activation of the carboxyl group. We hypothesized that the combination of both a sterically bulky hydroxylamine and steric hindrance from the C-2 methyl groups of cloxicillin allowed the active O-acylisourea intermediate to rearrange faster than it was attacked by the hydroxylamine. A less sterically bulky hydroxylamine, O-allylhydroxylamine hydrochloride (OAHA•HCl), was employed and the coupling reaction was run under aqueous buffered conditions. As shown in Scheme 6, this change worked well and penams 13–14 were obtained in improved yield (Scheme 6). Next, penicillins in which the free hydroxamate proton was replaced with a methyl group were made (Scheme 7). Thus, N-Methyl-O-allyl hydroxylamine hydrochloride (7a, from Scheme 3) was coupled to both cloxicillin and carbenicillin sodium to give N-methylated hydroxamates 15 and 16.
Scheme 5
Initial Coupling Attempt with Cloxicillin
Scheme 6
Improved Coupling of Penams under Acidic Aqueous Conditions
Scheme 7
Coupling of 7a to Penams
All cephalosporins were tested for antibacterial activity using the agar diffusion assay, with minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) determined for select compounds.[11-12] As shown in Table 1, many compounds exhibited notable activity against Gram-positive bacteria, albeit less than their parent counterparts (i.e. featuring free carboxylate). Highlighted among the compounds was the activity of cephalosporin 2b, with MIC values of 0.2 μM, 3 μM, and 3 μM against B. subtilis, S. aureus, and M. luteus, respectively. Further, compound 3, featuring a free hydroxamic acid exhibited good activity, with MIC values of 0.4 μM and 1.6 μM against B. subtilis and S. aureus, respectively. Although most of the compounds were not very active against Gram-negative bacteria, cephalosporin 4a, featuring the ATMO sidechain, showed good activity against Pseudomonas aeruginosa (K799/61) and both strains of Escherichia coli tested. With this impressive display of broad spectrum activity, MIC values were calculated for 4a and are listed in Table 1. When analyzing how N-substitution affected activity, cephalosporins bearing N-methyl substituted hydroxamates exhibited, in general, a decrease in both potency and/or broadness of antibacterial activity. This is illustrated by comparing the activities of 4b with 9 and 2a and 10.
Table 1
Spectrum of Activity for Cephalosporins
Entry
Cmpd.
Zones of Growth Inhibition (mm) and MIC Values (μM, in bold)
Bacillus subtilis
Staphylococcus aureus
Micrococcus luteus
Pseudomonas aeruginosa
Escherichia coli
ATCC6633
SG511
ATCC10240
K799/wt
K799/61
DC0
DC2
1
1 (Parent Cmpd.)
41< 0.1
360.2
353.13
0200
2050
12100
25
2
2a
303.0
263.0
1412.5
0
0
0
0
3
2b
200.2
323.0
283.0
0
0
0
0
4
3
310.4
311.6
276.25
21
17
0
0
5
10
351.6
1450
0
0
0
0
0
6
Cefotaxime (Parent Cmpd.)
36< 0.1
350.78
510.78
366
51< 0.1–0.2
310.1
< 0.1
7
4a
126.25-1.6
2125
1825
18200
276.0
206.0
311.6
8
4b
173–6
2412.5
14
0
15
0
22
9
8
17
11
0
0
1825
14
0
10
9
0
0
0
0
22
0
0
11
10
351.6
1450
0
0
20
0
0
12
Ciprofloxicin
21
21
0
18
20
nt
21
For diffusion assays, all zones represent 100% inhibition. All wells are not subtracted from reported zones. Ciprofloxicin tested at concentration of 1.66 μg/mL. nt = not tested. DC2 and K779/61 are antibiotic hypersusceptible strains
Similarly, penicillins were tested via diffusion assays, with MIC values determined for select compounds (Table 2). Hydroxamate containing penicillins were quite active against Gram-positive microbes as well, although generally not as active as the parent compounds. Notably, compounds 11 and 13 demonstrated significant activity against S. aureus, with MIC values of 0.4 μM and 1.6 μM, respectively. Interestingly, the rearranged urea, 12, had good activity against Gram-positive rods and activity against E. coli DC2 with a zone of inhibition of 26 mm. Removal of the acidic proton by N-methylation only slightly affected the activity of cloxicillin derivatives (compounds 13 and 15) but had a substantial effect on the carbenicillins, as replacing both carboxylates with hydroxamates gave a compound (i.e. N-methyl hydroxamate 16) that was completely inactive.
Table 2
Spectrum of Activity for Penicillins
Entry
Cmpd.
Zones of Growth Inhibition (mm) and MIC Values (μM, in bold)
Bacillus subtilis
Staphylococcus aureus
Micrococcus luteus
Pseudomonas aeruginosa
Escherichia coli
ATCC6633
SG511
ATCC10240
K799/wt
K799/61
DC0
DC2
1
Cloxicillin (Parent Cmpd.)
420.1–0.2
400.2
416.25
nt
nt
nt
nt
2
11
nt
300.4
16
0
16
0
0
3
12
350.8
320.8
2512.5
0
0
0
2625
4
13
16
311.6
17
0
0
0
0
5
15
281.6
261.6
17
0
0
0
0
6
Carbenicillin (Parent Cmpd.)
0.1
0.8
0.4
nt
nt
nt
nt
7
14
24
311.6
1925
0
0
0
0
8
16
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
9
Ciprofloxicin
21
21
0
18
20
nt
21
For diffusion assays, all zones represent 100% inhibition. All wells are not subtracted from reported zones. Ciprofloxicin tested at concentration of 1.66 μg/mL. nt = not tested. DC2 and K779/61 are antibiotic hypersusceptible strains
As shown in Table 3, select compounds were also screened against three S. aureus strains (SG511, ISR-001 and ISR-002). All compounds tested showed notable zones of inhibition, ranging from 22–32 mm. With these encouraging results, MIC values were also determined. Of special interest were the values for compounds 11 and 13, with MICs as low as 0.4 μM for both compounds. Lastly, carbenicillin analogue 14 exhibited MICs in the range of 1.6–6 μM against all three strains while the parent compound was seen to be inactive against strains ISR-001 and ISR-002).
Table 3
Spectrum of Activity for Select Compounds Against select S. aureus Strains
Entry
Cmpd.
Zones of Growth Inhibition (mm) and MIC (μM, in bold)
SG 511
ISR-001
ISR-002
1
1
0.2
6
6
2
2a
1.6–3
286.0
226.0
3
2b
3
2812.5
2412.5
4
3
1.6
2525
2325
5
Cloxicillin (Parent Cmpd.)
0.2
< 0.1
< 0.1
6
11
0.4–0.8
290.4
290.4–1.6
7
13
1.6
270.4
280.4–1.6
8
Carbenicillin (Parent Cmpd.)
0.8
100
100
9
14
1.6–3
283–6
326–12.5
10
Methicillin
3
6.25
6.25–25
11
Ampicillin
0.4
25
50
12
Cefaclor
6
50
50
13
Ciprofloxacin
0.2
0.471
>3.8
For diffusion assays, all zones represent 100% inhibition. All wells are not subtracted from reported zones. Ciprofloxicin tested at a concentration of 1.66 μg/mL.
To close, we have synthesized a focused set of cephalosporins and penicillins with hydroxamate replacement of the classical carboxyl groups. Preliminary biological assessments indicated that several of the hydroxamates retained broad spectrum activity against Gram-positive (including select MRSA strains) and Gram-negative pathogens. Further, removal of the acidic proton of the hydroxamate portion diminished both level of and the spectrum of activity. Thus, further functionalization of the ionizable position of these important antibiotics might be of value in development of much needed alternative forms of antibiotics.